다산 정약용의 사단칠정설 연구 비판과 그것에 관한 원인 분석

Abstract

I will investigate why Chŏng Yagyong criticized on theory of Four-Seven and researched that. Chŏng said that theory of Four-Seven is not the Way of Confucius, self-cultivation and politic people. Nevertheless, scholars devote themselves to research that in lifetime. However, He had also researched that. So I will also consider his that. Chŏng's Four Beginning is issue in principle and issued in public of heavenly principle and use to be issued in shape of energy. His Seven Feeling is issue in energy and use to be issued in private of shapely energy. His theory is criticizing against Zhu's that. However, Zhu's Four Beginnings are both harmony and disharmony. Accordingly, those is common between Chŏng and Zhu's that. But their theory of Seven Feeling are different. Chŏng's theory, Four Beginnings have both Heavenly Public and Physical Private's issuance as well as Seven Feelings, have issued on Zhu, Yi Hwang, Yi I and Yi Ik's it. Chŏng is influenced by Yi Hwang and Yi Ik. Chŏng's theory of Four Beginning are common between that of Zhu. Chŏng are common between that of Yi Hwang. Chŏng is common not only different between Yi Hwang and that of Zhu but also had different against those, theory of Yi Hwang and Zhu. Chŏng have succeeded Yi Hwang and Yi Ik. Why Chŏng have criticized for theory of Four-Seven but researched on that? At the time, Neo-Confucian scholars had research only on the Four-Seven that didn't relate self-cultivation and politic people, the Way of Confucius. So, he criticized their theory of Four-Seven. Since he researched on that related self-cultivation and politic people. That is, Four Beginnings mean Public of Heavenly Principle and Seven Feelings mean Private of Physical Energy. Consequently, the human should control the latter through the former. This just is self-cultivation and politic people, he emphasized.Therefore, Chŏng critiqued that Neo-Confucian scholars have studied on theory of Four-Seven regardless self-cultivation and politics at that time. Also, Chŏng's criticism implys to finish their debate:Yulgok school argues "energy manifestation and principle mounts on it in one way", criticizig theory of Toegye school. Toegye school argues argues "mutual issuence of principle and energy", criticizing theory of Yulgok school. He supposes the debate to indulge in academic discussion and so should return to self-cultivation and politic people. Therefore, he argues that should study theory of the Four-Seven reference to self-cultivation and politic people. Owing to that, he criticizes their way of the Four-Seven study, researching it.