윤치호의 문화횡단적(transcultural) 글쓰기 – 초기 일기(1883~1895)에 나타나는 언어, 장르, 주체구성을 중심으로
Transcultural Writing of Tchi Ho Yun — focused on language, genre, and subjectivity of the early diary(1883~1895)
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to examine the negotiation and reconstruction of modern Korean texts focused on the Yun, Tchi Ho(1865~1945)’s journal during the time of enlightenment of Korea. Yoon, Tchi Ho was one of the first modern intellectuals who studied abroad(Japan, China, and United States) in modern Korea(the late period of Chosun Dynasty), and he was also modern Korean reformer. He left his intellectual and emotional traces in his sixty-year journals. The analysis of his journal would show transculturation which is constituted by deculturation and neoculturation: three strata of analysis – language, genre, and subjectivity– would prove the mutation of the paradigm of Chosun Dynasty to Republic of Korea. First of all, he wrote his journal in three languages –old Chinese (1883~1887), Korean(1887~1889), and English(1889~1943). These alterations of languages of the journal deals with the formation of his world view which was expanded by his foreign experiences. The English language, the ultimate language he chose, exhibits the desire of Yun, Tchi Ho who endeavored to be affiliated with Western civilization. I also found the alteration of genre in his journal; this alteration proves the process of transculturation of his thoughts. At the beginning, he wrote his journal in the manner of traditional Korean writing such as the ancient style of authentic record(實錄) and of presenting proposal to the king(上疏文), With the accept of the Western modernity, his journal was also influenced by modernistic style: after he achieved the modern space-time perspectives, his journals turned to be the form of editorial(論說) of journalism. These changes of genre in his journal exhibit the decultration and neoculturation. Finally, the alteration of language and genre are in connection to the subjectivity; western modernity brought about the negotiation and reconstruction of subjectivity of eastern intellectual. Yun’s theoretical Confucian subjectivity of Chosun Dynasty was altered to the practical Christian subjectivity of Republic of Korea.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the negotiation and reconstruction of modern Korean texts focused on the Yun, Tchi Ho(1865~1945)’s journal during the time of enlightenment of Korea. Yoon, Tchi Ho was one of the first modern intellectuals who studied abroad(Japan, China, and United States) in modern Korea(the late period of Chosun Dynasty), and he was also modern Korean reformer. He left his intellectual and emotional traces in his sixty-year journals. The analysis of his journal would show transculturation which is constituted by deculturation and neoculturation: three strata of analysis – language, genre, and subjectivity– would prove the mutation of the paradigm of Chosun Dynasty to Republic of Korea. First of all, he wrote his journal in three languages –old Chinese (1883~1887), Korean(1887~1889), and English(1889~1943). These alterations of languages of the journal deals with the formation of his world view which was expanded by his foreign experiences. The English language, the ultimate language he chose, exhibits the desire of Yun, Tchi Ho who endeavored to be affiliated with Western civilization. I also found the alteration of genre in his journal; this alteration proves the process of transculturation of his thoughts. At the beginning, he wrote his journal in the manner of traditional Korean writing such as the ancient style of authentic record(實錄) and of presenting proposal to the king(上疏文), With the accept of the Western modernity, his journal was also influenced by modernistic style: after he achieved the modern space-time perspectives, his journals turned to be the form of editorial(論說) of journalism. These changes of genre in his journal exhibit the decultration and neoculturation. Finally, the alteration of language and genre are in connection to the subjectivity; western modernity brought about the negotiation and reconstruction of subjectivity of eastern intellectual. Yun’s theoretical Confucian subjectivity of Chosun Dynasty was altered to the practical Christian subjectivity of Republic of Korea.
참고문헌 (33)
- 국사편찬위원회, "윤치호 일기 1~4권" (1973), 탐구당
- 김상태, "윤치호 일기 1916~1943" (2001), 역사비평사
- 송병기, "국역 윤치호 일기 1" (2001), 연세대학교 출판부
- 박정신, "국역 윤치호 일기 2" (2003), 연세대학교 출판부
- 국사편찬위원회, "윤치호서한집" (1980)
- 김현주, "한국 근대 산문의 계보학" (2004), 소명출판
- 박지향, "윤치호의 협력일기" (2010), 이숲
- 손영식, "이성과 현실-송대 신유학에서 철학적 쟁점의 연구" (1999), UUP
- 신두환, "‘상소문’의 문예미학 탐색", 한국한문학연구, (33), pp.235~263 (2004), 한국한문학회
- 양현혜, "윤치호의 기독교 신앙과 허위의식", 기독교사상, 37 (1993), 대한기독교서회
- 오인환, "상소의 설득구조에 관한 연구: 시무상소문을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 47(3), pp.1~37 (2003), 한국언론학회
- 오항녕, "당대사 실록을 둘러싼 긴장, 규율, 그리고 지평 - 조선시대 당대사 편찬의 경험과 교훈 -", 역사학보, (205), pp.1~35 (2010), 역사학회
- 유영렬, "개화기의 윤치호 연구" (2011), 경인문화사
- 李雨卿, "朝鮮朝 「日記文學」 硏究", 박사, pp.1989
- 정선태, "개화기 신문 논설의 문학적 성격 연구", 한국학보, 89 (1997), 일지사
- 정선태, "개화기 신문 논설의 서사 수용 양상" (1999), 소명출판
- 정하영, "朝鮮朝 ‘日記’類 資料의 文學史的 意味", 정신문화연구, 19(4)통권 : 65 (1996)
- 정혜욱, "번역과 문화연구" (2010), 경성대학교출판부
- 황호덕, "한국 근대 형성기의 문장 배치와 국문 담론 : 타자·교통·번역·에크리튀르, 근대 네이션과 그 표상들", 박사, pp.2003
- 허경진, "윤치호의 우순소리 연구" (2010), 보고사
- 박우석, "프래그머티즘의 길잡이" (2001), 철학과 현실사
- 리디아 리우, "언어횡단적 실천" (2005), 소명출판
- 마루야마 마사오, "일본정치사상사연구" (1998), 통나무
- 마루야마 마사오, "번역과 일본의 근대" (2000), 이산
- 후지이다케시, "번역과 주체" (2005), 이산
- 宇野哲人, "송대 성리학사 II" (2005), UUP
- 이효덕, "표상 공간의 근대" (2002), 소명출판
- 제임즈 클리포드, "문화를 쓴다" (2000), 한국문화사
- 존 크라니어스커스, "강내희" (2001), 문화과학사
- 박미선, "우연성, 헤게모니, 보편성" (2009), b
- Aviva Chomsky, "The Cuba reader: history, culture, politics" (2003), Duke University Press
- Casanova, Pascale, "The World Republic of Letters" (2004), Harvard University Press
- Pratt, Mary Louise, "Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation" (1992), Routledge