본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Translating Ch’unhyangga: The Problems and a Strategy

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

No national literary tradition can expect to gain recognition, much less respect, from other cultures without conveying to them a tangible sense of the "greatness" of those works forming its classical canon, which can never be achieved without a convincing and solid translation of the original. Ch’unhyangga, the p’ansori version of Ch’unhyangjŏn, whose importance and value few Koreans would contend, still waits to be given that favor of proper English translation, which, above all, has to do justice to its unique musical complexity. This essay locates some of the problems and suggests a possible strategy. Current translation theories promote a "cultural" approach, which liberating as it is, places, if anything, greater weight on the need to transmit through translation the cultural capital the original work enjoys. Ch’unhyangga in mere prose rendering, therefore, can never present to the English reader what makes the work great or special, namely its versatile rhythm and melodic expressiveness. Despite the obvious gap between the two literary norms of English and Korean verse, making careful use of English prosody to yield a certain metrical musicality in the translated text would be the first and crucial step. Taking cue from the relatively simpler and more readily identifiable problems in the case of translating sijo, we honor the emphasis placed on caesura and hemistich by Richard Rutt and Marshall R. Pihl, but we also suggest a greater prosodic dynamism can be pursued in translating p’ansori into English. The relatively serene chinyangjo parts, for instance, can be matched with iambic meter, while the more agitated chungchungmori can invite a lavish use of the triple-time meters of anapestic or dactylic. Through such means, the charming, lively world of p’ansori such as Ch’unhyangga can hope to be properly shared by the English-speaking readers of the world.

Abstract

No national literary tradition can expect to gain recognition, much less respect, from other cultures without conveying to them a tangible sense of the "greatness" of those works forming its classical canon, which can never be achieved without a convincing and solid translation of the original. Ch’unhyangga, the p’ansori version of Ch’unhyangjŏn, whose importance and value few Koreans would contend, still waits to be given that favor of proper English translation, which, above all, has to do justice to its unique musical complexity. This essay locates some of the problems and suggests a possible strategy. Current translation theories promote a "cultural" approach, which liberating as it is, places, if anything, greater weight on the need to transmit through translation the cultural capital the original work enjoys. Ch’unhyangga in mere prose rendering, therefore, can never present to the English reader what makes the work great or special, namely its versatile rhythm and melodic expressiveness. Despite the obvious gap between the two literary norms of English and Korean verse, making careful use of English prosody to yield a certain metrical musicality in the translated text would be the first and crucial step. Taking cue from the relatively simpler and more readily identifiable problems in the case of translating sijo, we honor the emphasis placed on caesura and hemistich by Richard Rutt and Marshall R. Pihl, but we also suggest a greater prosodic dynamism can be pursued in translating p’ansori into English. The relatively serene chinyangjo parts, for instance, can be matched with iambic meter, while the more agitated chungchungmori can invite a lavish use of the triple-time meters of anapestic or dactylic. Through such means, the charming, lively world of p’ansori such as Ch’unhyangga can hope to be properly shared by the English-speaking readers of the world.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 최동현, "교주본 춘향가 I, II." (2005), 민속원
  2. 한지희, "세계문학으로서 한국문학: 번역과 번역공정의 문제에 대한 고찰", 비교문학, (54), pp.159~184 (2011), 한국비교문학회
  3. Abrams, M. H., "A Glossary of Literary Terms. 7th ed" (1999), Harcourt Brace College Publishers
  4. "Instead of Losing"[URL]
  5. Balcom, John, "Translating Modern Chinese Literature", pp.119~134 (2006), Continuum
  6. Bassnett, Susan, "Culture and Translation", pp.13~23 (2007), Multilingual Matters
  7. 이용식, "Pansori", pp.128~162 (2008), 국립국악원
  8. Cho Dong-il., "The Genre Nature of Pansori, In Korean Literature: Its Classical Heritage and Modern Breakthroughs", pp.227~245 (2003), Hollym
  9. Cho Dong-il, "Histoire de la littérature coréene: des origines à 1919" (2002), Fayard
  10. Choi Mikyung, "Le Chant de la fidèle Chunhyang" (1999), Zulma
  11. Jang, Yeonok, "Development and Change in Korean Narrative Song, P'ansori", 박사, pp.2000
  12. 로버트파우저, "Understanding Korean Literature (translation from Korean to English of Han'guk Munhak ui Ihae, an introductory book on Korean literature, by Kim Hunggyu)" (1997), M.E. Sharpe, New York, 미국
  13. Kim, Hunggyu, "P'ansori, In A History of Korean Literature", pp.288~302 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  14. Kim, Kichung, "An Introduction to Classical Korean Literature: From "Hyangga" to "P'ansori"" (1996), M. E. Sharpe
  15. Lefevere, André, "Translation Practice(s) and the Circulation of Cultural Capital. Some Aeneids in English, In Susan Bassnett and André Lefevere", pp.41~56 (1998), Multilingual Matters
  16. Lefevere, André, "Translation: Its Genealogy in the West, In Translation, History and Culture", pp.14~28 (1990), Pinter Publishers
  17. Lefevere, André, "Introduction: Proust’s Grandmother and the Thousand and One Nights. The ‘Cultural Turn’ in Translation Studies, In Translation, History and Culture", pp.1~13 (1990), Pinter Publishers
  18. Holmes, James S., "Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies" (1988), Rodopi
  19. Marshall R. Pihl, "The Korean Singer of Tales" (1994), Harvard Yenching Institute
  20. Rutt, Richard, "The Bamboo Grove: An Introduction to Sijo" (1971), University of California Press
  21. Rutt, Richard, "Korean Literature: Its Classical Heritage and Modern Breakthroughs", pp.189~205 (2003), Hollym
  22. Venuti, Lawrence, "Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. 2nd" (2008), Routledge
  23. Yu Sŭng, "Chunyhangga" (2005), Minsokwŏn

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)