본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

남북한 ‘옛이야기’의 변개양상 비교 - 「은혜 모르는 호랑이」를 중심으로

The Comparison of the Changing Pattern of the Yet-iyagy of South and North Korea - Based on the 「A Tiger Which Does Not Thank For Favor」 -

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to compare the changing pattern of the Yet-iyagi which are included in 『Collection of Folk Tales(醒睡稗說)』 , 『Folk Tales of Chosun(朝鮮の物語集附俚諺)』(1910), 『Collection of Chosun Folk Tales(朝鮮童話集)』(1924), 『The Great Collection of Folk Tales(朝鮮大童話集)』(1926), and also which are commonly included in the South and North textbooks from the 1945 Liberation until now. But, because the textbooks of North Korea have not dealt with Folk Tales, the author selected 「A Tiger Which Does Not Thank For Favor」 which might be appropriate for this paper. This Yet-iyagi is also better known as 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」. The results are as follows:In North Korea, when we divide the animal story into 'Event Part' and 'Aphorism Part', 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」 omitted the 'Aphorism Part', and put the great emphasis on the punishment for the betrayal. This seems to be the dichotomous thinking based on the core policies of North Korea such as citizenship, cooperation-unionship,In South Korea, Yet-iyagi put the great stress on the "Thanks for the Favor', and explained in detail the changing pattern of the "Aphorism Part'. This differences come from the differences of the basic attitudes between the South Korea and North Korea. Namely, in case of South Korea, the main purposes of the ‘Yet-iyagi’ have focused on the development of creativity and fantasy, while in case of North Korea, they have tried to strengthen the Ideology of Communism even in the 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」. Thus, in 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」 of North Korea, serious problems have proposed, because the original meanings of the yet-iyagi have been modified according to the changing patterns of ideology of the communism. The common meaning of the comparison of the changing pattern of the Yet-iyagi of South and North Korea is to promote the internal growth of children and adolescents and to heighten the educational contribution through story pattern of the animal. In addition, the meaning of this paper lies in the finding of the common emotion of the Korean in all, in spite of the ideological differences between South and North Korea.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare the changing pattern of the Yet-iyagi which are included in 『Collection of Folk Tales(醒睡稗說)』 , 『Folk Tales of Chosun(朝鮮の物語集附俚諺)』(1910), 『Collection of Chosun Folk Tales(朝鮮童話集)』(1924), 『The Great Collection of Folk Tales(朝鮮大童話集)』(1926), and also which are commonly included in the South and North textbooks from the 1945 Liberation until now. But, because the textbooks of North Korea have not dealt with Folk Tales, the author selected 「A Tiger Which Does Not Thank For Favor」 which might be appropriate for this paper. This Yet-iyagi is also better known as 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」. The results are as follows:In North Korea, when we divide the animal story into 'Event Part' and 'Aphorism Part', 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」 omitted the 'Aphorism Part', and put the great emphasis on the punishment for the betrayal. This seems to be the dichotomous thinking based on the core policies of North Korea such as citizenship, cooperation-unionship,In South Korea, Yet-iyagi put the great stress on the "Thanks for the Favor', and explained in detail the changing pattern of the "Aphorism Part'. This differences come from the differences of the basic attitudes between the South Korea and North Korea. Namely, in case of South Korea, the main purposes of the ‘Yet-iyagi’ have focused on the development of creativity and fantasy, while in case of North Korea, they have tried to strengthen the Ideology of Communism even in the 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」. Thus, in 「The Judgment of a Rabbit」 of North Korea, serious problems have proposed, because the original meanings of the yet-iyagi have been modified according to the changing patterns of ideology of the communism. The common meaning of the comparison of the changing pattern of the Yet-iyagi of South and North Korea is to promote the internal growth of children and adolescents and to heighten the educational contribution through story pattern of the animal. In addition, the meaning of this paper lies in the finding of the common emotion of the Korean in all, in spite of the ideological differences between South and North Korea.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 심의린, "조선동화대집" (2009), 보고사
  2. 이신성, "한국 고전문하그이 현장과 교재연구" (2008), 보고사
  3. 조선총독부, "조선동화집" (2003), 집문당
  4. "아동문학 7월호" (1963), 문학예술출판사
  5. "우리나라 옛’이야기" (1958), 아동도서출판사
  6. "우리나라 옛이야기(2) : 함정에 빠진 호랑이" (1980), 학우서방
  7. "제16과 함정에 빠진 호랑이, In 국어학습지도서 제6학년" (1962), 학우서방
  8. "제39과 함정에 빠진 호랑이, In 국어중급학교 제2학년용" (1964), 학우서방
  9. "제29과 함정에 빠진 호랑이, In 국어인민학교 제4학년용" (1985), 교육도서출판사
  10. "제39과 함정에 빠진 호랑이, In 국어인민학교 4" (1992), 교육도서출판사
  11. 김원석, "토끼의 재판" (1990), 교학사
  12. 손동인, "한국전래동화" (1990), 대원사
  13. 손동인, "남북어린이가 함께 보는 전래동화4" (1991), 사계절
  14. 신원, "토끼의 재판" (2003), 두산동아
  15. 심정인, "토끼의 재판" (2008), 옛이야기 요술항아리
  16. 이광렬, "토끼의 현명한 재판" (2011), 어린왕자
  17. 이명연, "토끼의 재판" (1995), 한국 글렌도만(주)
  18. 이문수, "토끼의 재판" (2011), 어린왕자
  19. 이상교, "한 권으로 읽은 우리 옛이야기-호랑이와 나그네" (2011), 아이즐
  20. 초당글방, "토끼의 재판" (2005), (주) 꼬네상스
  21. 홍윤희, "토끼의 재판" (1991), (주) 삐아제
  22. 강진옥, "이야기판과 이야기, 그리고 민중, In 한국인의 삶과 구비문학" (2007), 집문당
  23. 고정옥, "조선구전문학연구" (2009), 민속원
  24. 김순진, "전래동화 출판과 설화문학의 현대적 수용, In 한국인의 삶과 구비문학" (2007), 집문당
  25. 김화경, "북한의 설화 연구" (1997), 영남대학교출판부
  26. 김환희, "옛이야기의 발견" (2007), 우리교육
  27. 리동원, "조선구전문학연구 I" (1999), 문학예술종합출판사
  28. 막스 뤼티, "옛날 옛적에" (2008), 천둥거인
  29. 박정용, "설화의 전래동화 개작 양상과 문제점 연구 : <해와 달이 된 오누이>, <콩쥐팥쥐>, <아기장수 설화>를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2005
  30. 박현숙, "<선녀와 나무꾼> 전래동화의 설화수용양상과 문제점", 겨레어문학, (41), pp.329~360 (2008), 겨레어문학회
  31. 브르노 베틀하임, "옛이야기의 매력I" (2010), 시공주니어
  32. 서영미, "레짐과 어린이문학 - 조선총독부, 『조선동화집』", 학우서방, 『우리나라 옛이야기』를 중심으로, 2012, pp.(56), 51~77[DOI]
  33. 손동인, "한국전래동화사연구", 한국아동문학연구, (창간) (1990)
  34. 엄수경, "「콩쥐팥쥐」 설화의 전래동화 수용양상 연구", 석사, pp.2004
  35. 엄은진, "전래동화의 설화 수용과 독자 반응 연구", 석사, 독서교육, pp.2010
  36. 오오타케 키요미, "「조선동화」-와 호랑이-근대 일본인의 「조선동화」인식" (2003), 인식
  37. 이동백, "남북한 초등학교 국어교과서에 수록된 동화 비교 연구", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2003
  38. 이인경, "한국구비문학대계 소재 설화 해제" (2008), 민속원
  39. 잭 자이프스, "동화의 정체" (2006), 문학동네
  40. 정룡진, "아동문학의 새로운 발전" (1991), 문예출판사
  41. 정소영, "<해와 달이 된 오누이> 전래동화의 설화수용의식과 교육적 의미", 새국어교육, (73), pp.187~206 (2006), 한국국어교육학회
  42. 정소영, "한국전래동화에 나타난 설화 수용 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  43. 정소영, "한국전래동화에 나타난 설화 수용 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2006
  44. 조희웅, "韓國說話의 類型" (1996), 일조각

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)