본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한의 구전설화에 대한 인식 고찰

The study on the North Korean Folktale

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The folktale in North Korea is a creature of people in terms of class, and oral traditions in terms of its existence. And the meaning is from real story which people's life culture was reflected, people's desire was inspired into the fiction, which was formulated. In aspect of concept, there's lots of difference between north and south because we're focusing on verbal and north is on people. First of all, text books regarding oral literature and paper written as cultural level for the people who create and enjoy tale, and present scientific logic for the creature and classification of tale pattern. The pattern of tale is being explained by not a category of academy, but a cultural level. On this basis, people's creativity can be possible even currently, therefore modern oral literature is set up and the oral literature history is being described. This phenomenon was from the pattern that oral literature is arranged in the principal of history, but they have a merit which can secure a plenty of new materials and expand oral literature, it's far better than we do. This can show us big issue because south treats oral literature as classic literature. Tale pattern was appeared in terms of the text in discussion of north. There are classified as myth, legend, people story, fairy tale, fable and gag. The culture of oral literature seems to be survived in North Korea. People's song has been created during mass labor scene for the increase of productivity. This seems to be similar to our 1960's through 70's, it's necessary for us to have interest in this old custom. There should be literal communication between North and South even unification seems hard near future. Communication for the comparison of each study is being eagerly expected.

Abstract

The folktale in North Korea is a creature of people in terms of class, and oral traditions in terms of its existence. And the meaning is from real story which people's life culture was reflected, people's desire was inspired into the fiction, which was formulated. In aspect of concept, there's lots of difference between north and south because we're focusing on verbal and north is on people. First of all, text books regarding oral literature and paper written as cultural level for the people who create and enjoy tale, and present scientific logic for the creature and classification of tale pattern. The pattern of tale is being explained by not a category of academy, but a cultural level. On this basis, people's creativity can be possible even currently, therefore modern oral literature is set up and the oral literature history is being described. This phenomenon was from the pattern that oral literature is arranged in the principal of history, but they have a merit which can secure a plenty of new materials and expand oral literature, it's far better than we do. This can show us big issue because south treats oral literature as classic literature. Tale pattern was appeared in terms of the text in discussion of north. There are classified as myth, legend, people story, fairy tale, fable and gag. The culture of oral literature seems to be survived in North Korea. People's song has been created during mass labor scene for the increase of productivity. This seems to be similar to our 1960's through 70's, it's necessary for us to have interest in this old custom. There should be literal communication between North and South even unification seems hard near future. Communication for the comparison of each study is being eagerly expected.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 고정옥, "조선구전문학연구" (2009), 민속원
  2. 고정옥, "인민창작 1" (1961), 과학원출판사
  3. 고정옥, "조선구전문학연구" (1962), 과학원출판사
  4. 김대행, "북한의 문학사 연구-문학의 역사를 보는 시각. in: 시와 문학의 탐구" (1999), 역락
  5. 김문태, "北韓의 口碑文學 장르 인식과 관점 연구", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(3), pp.185~210 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
  6. 김문태, "북한의 설화 연구-북한설화집을 중심으로", 누리와 말씀, (6) (1999), 인천가톨릭대학교
  7. 김영희, "북한에서의 구전설화 전승과 연구", 한국문화연구, 5 (2002), 경희대학교 민속학연구소
  8. 김의석, "북한 설화에 나타난 주제론 연구-조총련계 학생용 교재를 중심으로", 통일문제연구, 23 (2001), 영남대학교 통일문제연구소
  9. 김종군, "남북문학사의 고소설 형성론에 대한 비교. in: 분단극복을 위한 인문학적 성찰" (2009), 선인
  10. 김종군, "북한의 고전문학 자료 현황과 연구동향", 온지논총, (25), pp.225~259 (2010), 온지학회
  11. 김준기, "북한의 신화 연구에 관한 고찰", 한국문화연구, 5 (2002), 경희대학교 민속학연구소
  12. 김화경, "북한 설화의 변개 실태에 관한 연구", 인문연구, 17(2) (1996), 영남대학교 인문과학연구소
  13. 김화경, "북한의 설화 연구 실태에 관한 고찰", 민족문화논총, 16 (1996), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
  14. 김화경, "한국의 설화" (2002), 지식산업사
  15. 리동원, "설화양식의 분화발전에 대한 고찰", 김일성종합대학학보(어문학), (1) (2008)
  16. 리동원, "조선구전문학개요(항일혁명편)" (1994), 사회과학출판사
  17. 리동원, "조선구전문학연구1" (1999), 문학예술종합출판사
  18. 리동원, "조선구전문학연구2" (2005), 문학예술출판사
  19. 민족문학사연구소, "북한의 우리문학사 인식" (1991), 창작과 비평사
  20. 설성경, "북한의 고전문학" (1990), 고려원
  21. 설성경, "남북한 문학사의 비교. in: 한국문학사의 현실과 이상" (1996), 새문사
  22. 설성경, "통일문학사 서술을 위한 단계적인 방안 연구", 통일연구, 2(1) (1998), 연세대학교 통일연구원
  23. 신동흔, "남북 고전문학사의 만남을 위하여. in: 분단극복을 위한 인문학적 성찰" (2009), 선인
  24. 오희복, "구전설화 작품들의 형태적 특성에 대한 간단한 고찰. in: 조선고전문학연구1" (1993), 문학예술종합출판사
  25. 이복규, "북한 설화에 대하여-관련자료집의 현황과 연구과제를 중심으로", 한국문화연구, 4 (2001), 경희대학교 민속학연구소
  26. 이복규, "북한의 문학사 서술양식", 국제어문, 9 (1989), 국제어문학연구회
  27. 장권표, "조선구전문학개요(고대중세편)" (1990), 사회과학출판사
  28. 조규익, "통일시대 한국고전문학사 서술의 전망", 온지논총, 11 (2004), 온지학회
  29. 지덕봉, "현 시기 구전 문학에 대한 연구와 대중화 사업에서 제기되는 당면한 몇 가지 문제", 문학연구, (4) (1962)
  30. 최옥희, "고전문예작품사화집" (1991), 예술교육출판사
  31. 한정미, "북한의 문예정책과 구비문학의 활용 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  32. 한정미, "북한의 설화인식과 전설의 도구화", 민속학연구, (15), pp.191~216 (2004), 국립민속박물관
  33. 황패강, "남북문학사의 과제. in: 한국 고전문학의 이론과 실제" (1997), 단국대 출판부

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)