우암 송시열의 사단칠정설과 그것에 대한 비판과 옹호

Abstract

I studied that Uam Song Siyeol argued that Four Beginnings is not only harmony but also disharmony, and criticized that Yi Hwang's and Yi I's, Song's teacher, and a difference between Four Beginnings and Seven Feeling. Song's Four Beginnings, including good evil, is different from Yi Hwang and Yi I, only pure good. Song is based on Zhu Xi's Four Beginnings. Four beginnings is good when issued clear energy and is evil when issued turbid it, Song's argument. But Yi Hwang and Yi I's argument is that Four Beginning is pure good. Because of this, Song criticized them. He also said not only Four Beginnings but also Seven Feeling are good and evil. In this case, It is difficult distintion between Four Beginning's and Seven Feeling's good and evil. Then, what is a difference between Four Beginnings and Seven Feelings's good and evil? About it, Song was important better good and evil than distinguish from them. Moreover, he said that Four Beginning issue by energy as well as principle. This is a difference between Song, Yi Hwang and Yi I. After that, Yi Ig, admired Yi Hwang, criticized Song's Four Beginning because Song is different from Yi I, Song's teacher. About it, Yi Hijo, Song's student, advocated Song because Song succeeded Mencius and Zhu's whole, but Yi Hwang and Yi I succeeded their part. However, Gwon Sangha, Song's other student, argued that succeeded Mencius and Zhu's not only Song but also Yi I, because he also considered that Four Beginnings are good and evil in Diagram of Mind, Naure and Feeling in Reply to Seong Howon. Consequently, he saw that Song and Yi I had succeeded Mencius and Zhu. Finally, he made them orthodox. This is a difference between Gwon Sangha and Yi Hijo.