지배질서 비판과 포섭 사이: 제인 에어의 양가성 연구
Jane Eyre’s Ambivalence: Her Critique of and Condoning the Dominant Social Order
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to reassess Charlotte Bront’s Jane Eyre (1847) from a post-colonial approach, arguing that Jane Eyre is a preeminent governess of the British Empire and Jane Eyre is an imperialist narrative. The novel has been acclaimed as an exemplary female Bildungsroman and even as a cult text of feminism. However, Jane is someone who condones rather than condemns the practices of British imperialism, discriminating the Other and justifying the ‘civilizing’ mission. British imperialism rooted in ethnocentrism needs to be scrutinized. Arguably, Jane Eyre under discussion is far from being a work of universal, world literature, but rather an imperial narrative. She remains critical of the inequality in class and gender but condones British imperialism. In order to detect Jane’s jingoistic tone of voice permeating in the text, both Edward Said’s ‘reading contrapuntally’ and Gayatri Spivak’s ‘transgressive reading’ strategies are employed, both quite valid in the sense that they are designed to question and challenge the hegemony upheld by the Victorians including Charlotte Bront herself. This discussion focuses on a colonial encounter between the metropolis and its colonies such as Jamaica and India, and reviews it within historical events such as British slavery and a civilizing mission. Then, a comparison between Charlotte Bront and Virginia Woolf in terms of their views of nationalism is drawn, including the role of women at home. Jane’s relationship with Bertha Mason, a Creole mad woman, is a very complex one that needs to be more closely examined. I would argue that Jane falls short of forming a cosmopolitan sisterhood partly because she is unable to identify herself with Bertha Mason. Jane emerges as an imperial figure rehabilitating the corrupt Rochester and endorsing Saint John Rivers’s devotion to a civilizing British mission in India. For Jane, empire matters most. She is content with the status quo, being the carer of her husband, Rochester and a governess of the Empire. Within this approach, Jane Eyre is a deeply problematic text. The reader, therefore, needs to be on full alert when (s)he comes to read English classics such as Jane Eyre that panders to British imperialism.
Abstract
This paper aims to reassess Charlotte Bront’s Jane Eyre (1847) from a post-colonial approach, arguing that Jane Eyre is a preeminent governess of the British Empire and Jane Eyre is an imperialist narrative. The novel has been acclaimed as an exemplary female Bildungsroman and even as a cult text of feminism. However, Jane is someone who condones rather than condemns the practices of British imperialism, discriminating the Other and justifying the ‘civilizing’ mission. British imperialism rooted in ethnocentrism needs to be scrutinized. Arguably, Jane Eyre under discussion is far from being a work of universal, world literature, but rather an imperial narrative. She remains critical of the inequality in class and gender but condones British imperialism. In order to detect Jane’s jingoistic tone of voice permeating in the text, both Edward Said’s ‘reading contrapuntally’ and Gayatri Spivak’s ‘transgressive reading’ strategies are employed, both quite valid in the sense that they are designed to question and challenge the hegemony upheld by the Victorians including Charlotte Bront herself. This discussion focuses on a colonial encounter between the metropolis and its colonies such as Jamaica and India, and reviews it within historical events such as British slavery and a civilizing mission. Then, a comparison between Charlotte Bront and Virginia Woolf in terms of their views of nationalism is drawn, including the role of women at home. Jane’s relationship with Bertha Mason, a Creole mad woman, is a very complex one that needs to be more closely examined. I would argue that Jane falls short of forming a cosmopolitan sisterhood partly because she is unable to identify herself with Bertha Mason. Jane emerges as an imperial figure rehabilitating the corrupt Rochester and endorsing Saint John Rivers’s devotion to a civilizing British mission in India. For Jane, empire matters most. She is content with the status quo, being the carer of her husband, Rochester and a governess of the Empire. Within this approach, Jane Eyre is a deeply problematic text. The reader, therefore, needs to be on full alert when (s)he comes to read English classics such as Jane Eyre that panders to British imperialism.
참고문헌 (25)
- 박상기, "『제인 에어』와 영국 민족주의 in : 19세기 영어권 여성문학론", pp.107~125 (2008), L.I.E.(Literature in English)
- 존 맥클라우드, "탈식민주의 길잡이" (2003), 한울 아카데미
- 박형지, "제국주의와 남성성: 19세기 영국의 젠더 형성" (2004), 아카넷
- 볼드윈, "문화코드 어떻게 읽을 것인가?" (2008), 한울 아카데미
- 가야트리 스피박, "경계선 넘기 - 새로운 문학 연구의 모색" (2008), 인간사랑
- 조애리, "제인 에어" (2005), 신아사
- Azim, Firdous, "Rereading Feminism’s Texts: Jane Eyre and Shirley in : The Colonial Rise of the Novel" (1993), Routledge
- Brontë, Charlotte, "Jane Eyre" (2000), Norton & Co Inc.
- Cesair, Aim, "Discourse on Colonialism" (1972), Monthly Review Press
- David, Deirdre, "Rule Britannia: Women, Empire, and Victorian Writing" (1995), Cornell UP
- Donaldson, Laura, "Decolonizing Feminisms: Race, Gender, and Empire" (1992), U. of North Carolina P
- Eagleton, Terry, "Myths of Power: A Marxist Study of the Brontës" (1975), Barnes & Noble
- Eagleton, Terry, "Heathcliff and the Great Hunger" (1995), Verso
- Gilbert, Sandra, "The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination" (1979), Yale UP
- McLeod, John, "Beginning Postcolonialism" (2000), Manchester UP
- Meyer, Susan, "Imperialism at Home: Race and Victorian Women’s Fiction" (1966), Cornell UP
- Plasa, Carl, "‘Incongruous Unions’: Slavery and the Politics of Metaphor in Jane Eyre in : Critical Issues: Charlotte Bront", pp.79~99 (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
- Politi, Jina, "Jane Eyre Class-ified", Literature and History, 8, pp.56~66 (1982)
- Said, Edward, "Culture and Imperialism" (1993), Chatto & Windus Ltd
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, "Three Women’s Texts and a Critique of Imperialism", Critical Inquiry, 12(1), pp.235~261 (1985)
- Todd, Loreto, "Jean Rhys Wide Sargasso Sea" (1995), York Press
- Wollstonecraft, Mary, "A Vindication of the Rights of the Woman" (1975), W.W. Norton
- Woolf, Virginia, "Professions for Women in : The Death of the Moth and Other Essays" (1942), Harcourt Brace
- Woolf, Virginia, "Three Guineas" (1966), Harbinger Book
- Woolf, Virginia, "A Room of One’s Own" (1987), Grafton Books
