한문교육 학술지 게재논문의 통계적 분석

Abstract

The purpose of this paper statistically examines the discussions contained in two major academic journals related to classical Chinese education, and then make suggestions on future directions as the only professional journal in this field. In these two journals, there was a total of 1,403 papers. Of the 1,403 papers, 965 were related to education of subject, accounting for 68.7 percent of the total, while 438 were related to content of subject, accounting for 31.3 percent of the total. In addition, 86.68 percent of the papers included secondary education, followed by 23.55 percent of the teaching and learning methods, 13.02 percent of the teaching materials, and 11.57 percent of the curriculum, and 11.57 percent the original theory of classical Chinese. Among the papers classified as content studies, there were many general Chinese literature papers that had nothing with education. Quantitative analysis of the methods of classical Chinese education has been attempted several times before. In particular, the achievement of classical Chinese education was examined at the 30th-anniversary academic conference of the Society for Korean Classical Chinese Education in 2011. However, it was rather focused on a bibliographical approach than a statistical review and failed to examine the overall research trend of academic activities. Although this paper does not include all the discussions on classical Chinese education, it is expected to examine the general tendency and characteristics of classical Chinese education research conducted at the academic society level.