본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

所有物主語の受身文におけるテキストのジャンル別使用状況について

An Analysis about the use situation according to the genre of the text in Passives with posession subject

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

In this paper I considered the relations a difference in genre of the text and the use of Passives with posession subjects. As a result, even if it was the same description sentence, the incidence of the Passives with posession subjects was low in the sentence of the place of scenario, but it was confirmed with the novel that incidence was high. In addition, in the case of a newspaper editorial, a lot of Passives with posession subjects were used in comparison with a scenario.However, it became clear to concentrate on the passiveness sentence of the type that most assumed an abstract noun the subject.In addition, it became clear that the passiveness sentences with a physical noun subject was not used even if it was the scene where a focus was affected by to a possession. Particularly, it was confirmed that an owner was often an indefinite person when a belonging was used for a Passives with posession subjects in Editorial of the newspaper

Abstract

In this paper I considered the relations a difference in genre of the text and the use of Passives with posession subjects. As a result, even if it was the same description sentence, the incidence of the Passives with posession subjects was low in the sentence of the place of scenario, but it was confirmed with the novel that incidence was high. In addition, in the case of a newspaper editorial, a lot of Passives with posession subjects were used in comparison with a scenario.However, it became clear to concentrate on the passiveness sentence of the type that most assumed an abstract noun the subject.In addition, it became clear that the passiveness sentences with a physical noun subject was not used even if it was the scene where a focus was affected by to a possession. Particularly, it was confirmed that an owner was often an indefinite person when a belonging was used for a Passives with posession subjects in Editorial of the newspaper

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 天野みどり, "文の成立に関する言語直感―無生物主語の「に」受動文を例に", 和光大学表現学部紀要, 1 (2000), 和光大学表現学部
  2. 天野みどり, "無生物主語のニ受動文―意味的関係の想定が必要な文―", 国語学, 205 (2001), 国語学会
  3. 奥津敬一郎, "日本語の受身文と視点", 日本語学, 11(8) (1992), 明治書院
  4. 奥津敬一郎, "連体即連用?不可分離所有と所有者移動", 日本語学, 14(12) (1995), 明治書院
  5. 金水敏, "受動文の歴史についての一考察", 国語学, 164 (1991), 国語学会
  6. 金水敏, "場面と視点―受身文を中心に", 日本語学, 11(8) (1992), 明治書院
  7. 金水敏, "受身文の固有·非固有説について", 近代語研究, 9 (1992), 武蔵野書院
  8. 久野すすむ, "談話の文法" (1978), 大修館書店
  9. 高見健一, "機能的構文論による日英語比較―受身文、後置文の分析―" (1995), くろしお出版
  10. 高見健一, "機能的統語論" (1997), くろしお出版
  11. 丁意祥, "いわゆる〈持ち主受身〉について", 現代日本語研究, 2 (1995), 大阪大学現代日本語学講座
  12. 丁意祥, "直接受身としての<非分離性関係の受身>", 日本学報, 15 (1996), 大阪大学文学部日本学研究室
  13. 張麟声, "非情ガ(ハ)+有情ニ+サレル」型受身文について", 現代日本語研究, 3 (1996), 大阪大学現代日本語学講座
  14. 仁田義雄, "藤森ことば論集" (1992), 清文堂出版
  15. 裵, "所有物主語の受身文の出現様相―受身文内の共起要素との関連性を中心に―", 日本語文法, 4(1) (2004), 日本語文法学会
  16. 裵, "所有物主語の受身文における視点違反の判断と出現様相について", 国語学, 219 (2004), 国語学会
  17. 益岡隆志, "命題の文法" (1987), くろしお出版
  18. 村上三寿, "動詞のうけみのかたちにおける結果相", ことばの科学, 3 (1989)
  19. 森山卓郎, "日本語動詞述語文の研究" (1988), 明治書院
  20. 山内博之, "日本語の受身文における「持ち主受身」の位置づけについて", 日本語教育, 92 (1997), 日本語教育学会

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)