본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

저출산 극복을 위한 일본의 출산양육지원 정책의 실과 허

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

Japan has come up with various policies to increase the birth rate by enhancing the child raising environments. However, the burden for raising child has not been solved, and Japan’s birth rate so low that it is even lower than the 1.57 shock incident. The reason Japan cannot recover its birth rate is because of the economic recession, irregular employments, quantity deficiency in policies, and lack of supporting policy for housewives. As we take a look at the various child care policies, there were not so much successful because those only focus on the child care only for the children with working moms. Therefore, there is a need for a new supporting policy from a new perspective. This research worked on a new supporting system through Japan’s general child care policy and preceding researches. The result showed that the policy only for working moms definitely demonstrated some limitation on its effect, and it lacks the societal networking system. Particularly, all the researches that have been done to increase the effects on overcoming the low birth rate are supposed to give priorities based on precedents; however, the plans were only focused on coming up with new innovative policies without a careful consideration. Furthermore, for child healthy upbringing policy, it is necessary to adopt a general welfare service and enhance general benefits. Such policies would be indispensable factors in overcoming economic burden. Therefore, there is a need to consider the living environments for parents with children and to promote a more effective policy that comes with a continuous countermeasure.

Abstract

Japan has come up with various policies to increase the birth rate by enhancing the child raising environments. However, the burden for raising child has not been solved, and Japan’s birth rate so low that it is even lower than the 1.57 shock incident. The reason Japan cannot recover its birth rate is because of the economic recession, irregular employments, quantity deficiency in policies, and lack of supporting policy for housewives. As we take a look at the various child care policies, there were not so much successful because those only focus on the child care only for the children with working moms. Therefore, there is a need for a new supporting policy from a new perspective. This research worked on a new supporting system through Japan’s general child care policy and preceding researches. The result showed that the policy only for working moms definitely demonstrated some limitation on its effect, and it lacks the societal networking system. Particularly, all the researches that have been done to increase the effects on overcoming the low birth rate are supposed to give priorities based on precedents; however, the plans were only focused on coming up with new innovative policies without a careful consideration. Furthermore, for child healthy upbringing policy, it is necessary to adopt a general welfare service and enhance general benefits. Such policies would be indispensable factors in overcoming economic burden. Therefore, there is a need to consider the living environments for parents with children and to promote a more effective policy that comes with a continuous countermeasure.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 출산장려 및 고령화대응정책의 주요선진국 동향과 시사점, "김민재", 국회예산정책처, ~, pp.저출산·고령사회 대응 연구 제3호 (2009)
  2. 배해선, "少子化対策の韓日比較", 일어일문학, (55), pp.277~295 (2012), 대한일어일문학회
  3. 신윤정, "일본의 “새로운 저출산 정책 현황” 및 시사점", 보건복지포럼, 통권 : 149, pp.104~115 (2009), 한국보건사회연구원
  4. 신필균, "복지국가의 스웨덴" (2012), 후마니타스
  5. 일본의 저출산·고령화현황과 대책, "송태민", 국제보건복지, ~, pp.정책동향2 (2010)
  6. 일본의 일하는 여성 보육지원, "서문희", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2008)
  7. "일본의 출산율 증가 ‘이유 있었네!’ -현실적 지원으로 일육아 양립지원 가능-", 이코노미세계2009.07.23, ~ (2009)
  8. 저출산 대응 주요정책의 현황 및 과제 현안보고서, "유해미", 국회입법조사처, ~, pp.제39호 (2009)
  9. 기타 아키또, "일본에 있어서의 아동권리의 현황과 과제", 아동과 권리, 8(1), pp.1~6 (2004), 한국아동권리학회
  10. 일-생활균형을 위한 가족지원체계구축과 정책대안, "정영금", 국회여성위원회, ~ (2008)
  11. 한국경제, "“출산은 ‘노후보상기대-양육비용’비교해 선택하는 행위”, In 경제사상사여행 (9)" (2013)
  12. 황성하, "日本 家族福祉政策의 現況에 대한 考察", 일어일문학, (52), pp.421~437 (2011), 대한일어일문학회
  13. Leibenstein, H., "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), pp.183~207 (1950)
  14. J.Gay., "he Fall in Men;s Return to Marriage-Declining Productivity Effects or Changing Selection", Journal of Human Resources, (32)통권 : 3, pp.481~504 (2000)
  15. 土谷みち子, "家族援助論" (2009), 青踏社
  16. 共同社会政策, ""子ども·子育てビジョン" について~子どもの笑顔があふれる社会のために~" (2013), 内閣府
  17. 高橋重宏, "子ども家庭福祉とソシャルワ-ク" (2007), 有斐閣
  18. 大寛, "少子化の人口学" (2004), 原書房
  19. 千葉喜久也, "児童·家庭福祉論" (2011), みらい
  20. 千葉茂明, "児童福祉論" (2007), みらい
  21. 少子化大策と家族政策-結婚に対する負担感の軽減のために-立法と調査, "筒井隆志", ~, pp.No.262 (2006)
  22. 増淵千保美, "児童養護問題の構造とその対策体系-児童福祉の位置と役割-" (2008), 高菅出版
  23. 成清美治, "新版 児童福祉" (2008), 学文社
  24. 山縣文治, "よくわかる子ども家庭福祉" (2005), ミネルヴァ書房
  25. 少子化と子育て·就業支援事業の効果の検証, "吉田浩", ~, pp.会計検査研究 No.19 (1999)
  26. 吉田真理, "児童福祉" (2010), 青踏社
  27. Taikann, "Demography of the declining birthrate" (2004), HanaShyobou

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)