한국과 일본의 출산율과 양성평등정책에 관한 연구
Study in South Korea and Japan's birthrate and gender equality policy support
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Birthrates in Korea and Japan still remain at the low rank in OECD countries. Even though both countries are trying various policies to increase birth rates, low birthrate cannot be overcome easily. In addition, as working couples are increasing, parenting issue becomes more important. Even though the systems like maternity leave and child-care leave are adopted to combine job works and family needs, there are still ongoing problems. Additionally because of child-rearing expenses burden in the family, families are increasing who postpone the birth and think they are Ok with no children. However, Sweden and France among European countries with many similar experiences have succeeded in increasing the birthrates through the policies like gender equality support policy. Because low birthrate phenomenon undermines national competitiveness, related emergency measures are required. Therefore, this research studied about low birthrate policy related gender equality support policies which have been executed by Korea and Japan through preceding studies, literature studies and internet data. Study results showed various mother and father related policies were not properly developed ad effective policies. And, low salary level just undermines the meaning of the policy. In order to seriously increase the real birthrate, nation's bond of sympathy with gender equality for the system should be established and economic burden should be reduced as well. As a measure for this, the establishment of employment system with gender equality and parenting environment friendly corporate culture should be desperately required. This study is expected to be the meaningful basic data for low birthrate policy directions in the future.
Abstract
Birthrates in Korea and Japan still remain at the low rank in OECD countries. Even though both countries are trying various policies to increase birth rates, low birthrate cannot be overcome easily. In addition, as working couples are increasing, parenting issue becomes more important. Even though the systems like maternity leave and child-care leave are adopted to combine job works and family needs, there are still ongoing problems. Additionally because of child-rearing expenses burden in the family, families are increasing who postpone the birth and think they are Ok with no children. However, Sweden and France among European countries with many similar experiences have succeeded in increasing the birthrates through the policies like gender equality support policy. Because low birthrate phenomenon undermines national competitiveness, related emergency measures are required. Therefore, this research studied about low birthrate policy related gender equality support policies which have been executed by Korea and Japan through preceding studies, literature studies and internet data. Study results showed various mother and father related policies were not properly developed ad effective policies. And, low salary level just undermines the meaning of the policy. In order to seriously increase the real birthrate, nation's bond of sympathy with gender equality for the system should be established and economic burden should be reduced as well. As a measure for this, the establishment of employment system with gender equality and parenting environment friendly corporate culture should be desperately required. This study is expected to be the meaningful basic data for low birthrate policy directions in the future.
참고문헌 (45)
- 김두섭, "한국의 제2차 출산력변천과 그 인과구조", 인구와 사회, 1(1), pp.23~53 (2005), 인구및고령사회연구소
- 강혜경, "남성 육아휴직자의 양육 경험과 성별관계의 변화: 남성 육아휴직자의 양육 실천의 경험을 중심으로", 여성학논집, 30(2), pp.133~167 (2013), 한국여성연구원
- 모성보호 사각지대 해소 및 고용효과 강화를 위한 모성보호제도 재설계방안 연구, "장지연", 고용노동부, ~ (2013)
- 성평등 사회 실현이 저출산 극복의 지름길, "박수미", 한국여성정책연구원, 30~35 (2009)
- 백승훈, "한국 가족정책의 형성과 변화 : 제도 변화를 중심으로", 박사, 행정학과, pp.2012
- 동북아 3개국(일본, 중국, 북한) 및 미국의 출산동향과 시사점, "안태윤", 경기도가족여성연구원, 1~8 (2013)
- 여성경력단절예방강화를 위한 법․제도 개선방안 연구, "김영옥", 한국여성정책연구원, ~ (2014)
- 저출산 원인 및 종합대책 연구, "이삼식", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2005)
- 오미희, "저출산 극복을 위한 일본의 출산양육지원 정책의 실과 허", 일어일문학, (59), pp.347~376 (2013), 대한일어일문학회
- 제2차 경력단절여성등의 경제활동촉진 기본계획(안)(2015-2019), "여성가족부", 여성가족부, ~ (2014)
- 남성육아참여 활성화를 위한 제도개선 방안, "한국여성정책연구원", 한국여성정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서(수시과제)-18 (2012)
- 양성평등기본법, 찾잔 속의 태풍이 되지 않으려면, 양성평등기본법과 여성정책 패러다임, "함영이", 한국여성정책연구원, 1~40 (2014)
- 남성의 육아휴직 참여: 제도와 실행효과, '아빠의 육아참여, 자녀양육을 위한 성평등한 부모역할', "2013", 한국여성정책연구원
- 현대경제연구원, "체어퍼슨노트 사내한 2013-41(472)", ~ (2013)
- 황성하, "日本 家族福祉政策의 現況에 대한 考察", 일어일문학, (52), pp.421~437 (2011), 대한일어일문학회
- 한국일보, "출산율 2의 선행교육", 한국일보, ~ (2014)
- KBS NEW, "청년을 버린 나라에선 당신의 노후도 없다", 인터넷뉴스, ~ (2014)
- "경력단절여성법, '여성 경제활동·고용률 기여 못해' 한국법제연구원, 법 시행후 5년간 고용률 상승 0.2%p 그쳐" (2014)[URL]
- "남성 육아휴직 증가 이유는? '아빠 어디가'와 육아휴직 급여제도", 이투데이뉴스, ~ (2014)
- "남성 육아휴직 증가, 작년보다 50% 이상 증가...이유보니 '제도 덕분?", MBN, ~ (2014)
- 黒田祥子, "日本人の働き方と労働時間に関する現状 内閣府規制改革会議雇用ワーキンググループ資料", 1~25 (2013)
- 日本人の労働時間－時短政策導入前とその20 年後の比較を中心に－, "黒田祥子", 独立行政法人経済産業研究所, 1~18, pp.RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series 10-P-002 (2010)
- 共同社会政策, "について～子どもの笑顔があふれる社会のために" (2013), 内閣府
- 千葉喜久也, "児童・家庭福祉論" (2011), みらい
- 筒井隆志, "少子化大策と家族政策ー結婚に対する負担感の軽減のためにー立法と調査", ~ (2006)
- 増淵千保美, "児童養護問題の構造とその対策体系ー児童福祉の位置と役割ー" (2008), 高菅出版
- 副島宏輝, "'2012年ベネズエラ労働法改正と日本の育児休暇・産休制度'慶應義塾大学出版会株式会社", 法律学研究, (52), pp.185~204 (2014)
- "育児休業、介護休業等育児又は家族介護を行う労働者の福祉に関する法律及び雇用保険法の一部を改正する法律の概 要" (2014)[URL]
- "「平成23年度雇用均等基本調査」の概況" (2014)[URL]
- "仕事と家庭の両立をめぐる現状" (2011)[URL]
- 日本經濟新問, "男性の育休取得が激減…背景に「パタハラ」イクメンプロジェクト委員渥美由喜", ~ (2013)
- "日출산율 1.43으로 연속 소폭 상승, 30-40대 출산 증가", Asahi Asia Antenna, ~ (2014)
- 内閣府, "特集・成長戦略の中核である女性の活躍に向けてー平成25年版男女共同参加白書の公表ー共同参加", ~ (2013)
- Going for Growth, Interim Report 2014, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2014)
- Maternity and paternity at work : Law and practice across the world, "ILO", ~ (2014)
- "Maternity protection makes headway amid vast global gaps", ILO News room, ~ (2014)
- 働く母親・父親を取り巻く状況―実際の保護の欠如が課題, "ILO", ILO, ~ (2014)
- 働く母親及び父親に係わる世界の法及び実際, "ILO", ILO, ~ (2014)
- "World Economic Forum", 세계경제포럼, ~ (2014)
- 세계성(性)평등보고서 2014, , ~ (2014)
- "‘한국의 양성평등’100점만점에 63점" (2014)[URL]
- "2014년10월28일 연합뉴스" (2014)[URL]
- "男の育児「賛成9割、取得２％」の理由" (2014)[URL]