본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일한 양언어의 대응 관계를 통한 통사와 의미의 비대칭성 -일본어의 「V-上げる」문을 중심으로-

The Asymmetry of the syntax and meaning through the corresponding relation of the language of Japanese and Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The results of examination in this paper can be summarized by the following table. element insertion Scope of 「dake」and 「nai」 wide scope of 「dake」wide scope of 「nai」 TypeⅠ ◯ bi-clause ◯ mono-clause ◯ bi-clause TypeⅡ X bi-clause ◯ mono-clause ◯ bi-clause TypeⅢ X bi-clause ◯ mono-clause X bi-clause The above study result shows the asymmetry of the syntax and meaning, and the content of the analysis can be summarized as the follows. 1. If the「V-ageru」sentence is only considered, the 「V-ageru」sentence of pattern I and pattern II belongs to the same pattern where 「V」and 「ageru」 have the separate meaning of verb. But, it can be classified into the pattern I and pattern II when it is compared to its corresponding Korean expression. 2. the pattern II and pattern III of「V-ageru」sentence, when the「V-ageru」sentence is only considered, the pattern II has separate verb meaning one another like「V」and 「ageru」. But, pattern III belongs to the different pattern in which 「ageru」does not have separate meaning of verb. In spite of this fact, the results of the element intervention involvement test show the same syntactic structure one another. The above explanation shows the asymmetry of the syntax and meaning in which each of「V」and 「ageru」has a meaning of separate verb and different syntactic structures one another.

Abstract

The results of examination in this paper can be summarized by the following table. element insertion Scope of 「dake」and 「nai」 wide scope of 「dake」wide scope of 「nai」 TypeⅠ ◯ bi-clause ◯ mono-clause ◯ bi-clause TypeⅡ X bi-clause ◯ mono-clause ◯ bi-clause TypeⅢ X bi-clause ◯ mono-clause X bi-clause The above study result shows the asymmetry of the syntax and meaning, and the content of the analysis can be summarized as the follows. 1. If the「V-ageru」sentence is only considered, the 「V-ageru」sentence of pattern I and pattern II belongs to the same pattern where 「V」and 「ageru」 have the separate meaning of verb. But, it can be classified into the pattern I and pattern II when it is compared to its corresponding Korean expression. 2. the pattern II and pattern III of「V-ageru」sentence, when the「V-ageru」sentence is only considered, the pattern II has separate verb meaning one another like「V」and 「ageru」. But, pattern III belongs to the different pattern in which 「ageru」does not have separate meaning of verb. In spite of this fact, the results of the element intervention involvement test show the same syntactic structure one another. The above explanation shows the asymmetry of the syntax and meaning in which each of「V」and 「ageru」has a meaning of separate verb and different syntactic structures one another.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 김창섭, "국어의 단어형성과 단어구조 연구", pp.8~221 (1996), 태학사
  2. 박용일, "일본어 イ형 보조동사문의 통사구조에 대한 의미해석 방법", 일본문화연구, (52), pp.199~214 (2014), 동아시아일본학회
  3. 최현배, "우리말본", pp.10~268 (1980), 정음사
  4. 井上和子, "変形文法と日本語(上·下)", pp.3~268 (1976), 大修館書店
  5. 片岡喜代子, "日本語否定文の構造:かき混ぜ文と否定呼応表現", pp.1~279 (2006), くろしお
  6. 長谷川信子, "生成日本語学入門", pp.4~192 (1999), 大修館書店
  7. 姫野昌子, "複合動詞の構造と意味用法", pp.1~266 (1999), ひつじ書房
  8. 沼田善子, "いわゆる日本語助詞の研究", pp.105~391 (1986), 凡人社
  9. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ", pp.11~358 (1984), くろしお
  10. 影山太郎, "文法と語形成", pp.1~389 (1993), くろしお
  11. 柴谷方良, "日本語の分析", pp.3~370 (1978), 大修館書店
  12. 森山新, "日本語多義語学習辞典-動詞篇-", pp.22~521 (2011), アルク
  13. Nishigauchi, T., "Quantification in the Theory of Grammar", pp.1~269 (1990), Kluwer
  14. Kato, Y., "Sophia Linguistica 19", pp.1~127 (1985), Monograph Sophia University

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)