「ない形」における誤用パターンに関する一考察 -名詞文と形容詞文を対象に-
The study on Error Pattern analysis of [nai] Form on Noun Sentence and Adjective Sentence
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes the pattern of error of the formal type [nai] form of noun sentences and adjective sentences, and examines the strategy on [nai] form of output for the Korean learners of Japanese language. The first survey shows the rate of error of [nai] form in the order of noun sentence 〈 i adjective sentence 〈 na adjective sentence. To correct the error of [nai] form, inflection rule for noun sentence and na adjective sentence and inflection rule for i adjective sentence were distinguished and explained; then shadowing practice was carried out before a test. The result shows there was decrease in the error of [nai] type/form in almost all parts of speech. However, i adjective sentence had highest rate of error of [nai] form compared to noun sentence and na adjective sentence. As the reports of previous research, learning of [nai] form of i adjective sentence seems to take the longest time. In case of Korean learners of Japanese language, there is interference of the mother tongue in [nai] form of noun sentence, and they use [additional] strategy of using 「jyanai」 in [nai] type/form of i adjective sentence and 「∅ nai」 in [nai] form of na adjective sentence.
Abstract
This paper analyzes the pattern of error of the formal type [nai] form of noun sentences and adjective sentences, and examines the strategy on [nai] form of output for the Korean learners of Japanese language. The first survey shows the rate of error of [nai] form in the order of noun sentence 〈 i adjective sentence 〈 na adjective sentence. To correct the error of [nai] form, inflection rule for noun sentence and na adjective sentence and inflection rule for i adjective sentence were distinguished and explained; then shadowing practice was carried out before a test. The result shows there was decrease in the error of [nai] type/form in almost all parts of speech. However, i adjective sentence had highest rate of error of [nai] form compared to noun sentence and na adjective sentence. As the reports of previous research, learning of [nai] form of i adjective sentence seems to take the longest time. In case of Korean learners of Japanese language, there is interference of the mother tongue in [nai] form of noun sentence, and they use [additional] strategy of using 「jyanai」 in [nai] type/form of i adjective sentence and 「∅nai」 in [nai] form of na adjective sentence.
참고문헌 (13)
- 家村伸子, "日本語学習者における否定の習得に関する研究ー横断的な発話資料に基づいてー", 広島大学教育学部紀要第二部, (48), pp.305~314 (1999), 広島大学教育学研究科
- 家村伸子, "学習者の誤用を産み出す言語処理のストラテジー(2)ー否定形「じゃない」の場合ー", 広大日本語教育研究, (11), pp.43~48 (2001), 広島大学教育学研究科
- 邱学瑾, "シャドーイング練習は敬語の口頭運用能力を高めるのか", 2011年度日本語教育学会実践研究フォーラムポスター発表, pp.1~2 (2011)
- 小林ミナ, "日本語教育における教育文法", 日本語文法, 2(1), pp.153~170 (2002), 日本文法学会
- 迫田久美子, "日本語指導におけるシャドーイングの基礎的研究(2)ー音読練習との比較調査からわかること", pp.241~242 (2005), 日本語教育学会秋季大会ポスター発表
- 최진희, "初級レベル学習者におけるシャドーイングとリスニングの実践研究", 일본어교육연구, 19(19), pp.113~124 (2010), 한국일어교육학회
- 최진희, "視聴覚資料を用いたシャドーイング練習＊ ─上級レベルの学習者を対象に─", 日本文化學報, 51(51), pp.95~112 (2011), 한국일본문화학회
- 野呂幾久子, "第二言語における否定形の習得過程ー中国人のこどもの事例研究ー", 静岡大学教育学部研究報告, (45), pp.1~12 (1994), 静岡大学教育学部
- 南雅彦, "日本語·日本語教育を研究する", pp.1~4 (2013), 日本語教育通信Japan Foundation国際交流基金
- 森山新, "動詞·形容詞の否定形のインプットの頻度と習得との関係", 日本認知言語学会論文集, (10), pp.387~393 (2009), 日本認知言語学会
- 韓国人学習者の日本語作文に見られる誤りの原因ー日本語教育のためのアジア諸言語の対照作文データの収集とコーパスの構築ー, "조남성", 144~157 (2001)
- 조남성, "「ダ의 부정형」의 오용 분석과 지도법", 日本語敎育, (29), pp.3~16 (2004), 한국일본어교육학회
- Kanagy, R., "Developmenal sequences in the acquisition of Japanese as a foreign language:the case of negation", 박사, pp.1991