근대 일본의 공예교육과 동아시아 예술의 특수성
Craft Education in Modern Japanese and the Characteristics of Art in East Asian
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Today, domestic craftsmen seem to be seriously undergoing the problem of identity and lack of theory. In order to solve these problems, it would be difficult to find a clue to solving the problems simply by examining the patterns of domestic craftsmen and diagnosing cases of advanced overseas. First, we should look into the origin of 'Crafts' that flowed into Korea through Japan, and examine the ideals and practices of those who established them and how they influenced the history of our traditional crafts. The concept of '工藝(crafts)' was introduced into Korea through modern Japan. In the course of modernization, Japan also proceeded to imitate Western art classifications. What was the problem in the process was the difference of the concept of 'art' in modern Western and in East Asia. Japan, which had been so westernized at the time, insisted that it was "de-Asia." Japan accepted this concept without filtration, and rebellions and conflicts in such a process leave a clear trail in the ideology of modern arts and crafts education in Japan. This study examines the situation of modern crafts world in Japan, which had the same East Asian art tradition and arbitrarily embraced Western art concept first, and analyzes the process of conflict and harmony about the concepts of craft as traditional tools and new Western modern art concepts among in japanese craftsmen at that time. It is a study to examine the present condition of the system. In recent years, there has been a lot of research on the Meiji art to look closely at Japanese craft theories. In particular, Japanese scholars pay attention to the process of importing western art concepts from the pre-Edo era molding culture, in which there was no conceptual art, and creating a system of art. And it is especially noteworthy that they try to find out what Japan has received as 'art' in the past by studying what has been excluded as 'non-art' in such a process.
Abstract
Today, domestic craftsmen seem to be seriously undergoing the problem of identity and lack of theory. In order to solve these problems, it would be difficult to find a clue to solving the problems simply by examining the patterns of domestic craftsmen and diagnosing cases of advanced overseas. First, we should look into the origin of 'Crafts' that flowed into Korea through Japan, and examine the ideals and practices of those who established them and how they influenced the history of our traditional crafts. The concept of '工藝(crafts)' was introduced into Korea through modern Japan. In the course of modernization, Japan also proceeded to imitate Western art classifications. What was the problem in the process was the difference of the concept of 'art' in modern Western and in East Asia. Japan, which had been so westernized at the time, insisted that it was "de-Asia." Japan accepted this concept without filtration, and rebellions and conflicts in such a process leave a clear trail in the ideology of modern arts and crafts education in Japan. This study examines the situation of modern crafts world in Japan, which had the same East Asian art tradition and arbitrarily embraced Western art concept first, and analyzes the process of conflict and harmony about the concepts of craft as traditional tools and new Western modern art concepts among in japanese craftsmen at that time. It is a study to examine the present condition of the system. In recent years, there has been a lot of research on the Meiji art to look closely at Japanese craft theories. In particular, Japanese scholars pay attention to the process of importing western art concepts from the pre-Edo era molding culture, in which there was no conceptual art, and creating a system of art. And it is especially noteworthy that they try to find out what Japan has received as 'art' in the past by studying what has been excluded as 'non-art' in such a process.
참고문헌 (17)
- 노유니아, "조선미술전람회 공예부의 개설 과정에 대한 고찰: 전람회를 통한 근대 공예 개념의 형성과 확산", 美術史論壇, (38), pp.93~123 (2014), 한국미술연구소[DOI]
- 신나경, "민예론의 수용양상과 민예의 미적가치 - 야나기 무네요시의 연구에 대한 한·일간 비교를 중심으로 -", 일어일문학, (66), pp.421~437 (2015), 대한일어일문학회[DOI]
- 최공호, "산업과 예술의 기로에서" (2008), 미술문화
- 한국미술사학회, "근대미술의 대외교섭" (2010), 예경
- 홍선표, "동아시아 미술의 근대와 근대성" (2009), 학고재
- 市川祐樹, "「工芸」および「職人」概念の歴史的変遷に関する考察 ―職人の技術伝承に関する基礎的研究(2)", 地域政策研究, 10, pp.109~128 (2007), 高崎経済大学地域政策学会
- 金子賢治, "現代陶芸の造形思考" (2001), 阿部出版
- 北澤憲昭, "美術のポリティクス: ―「工芸」の成り立ちを焦点として" (2013), ゆまに書房
- 北澤憲昭, "アヴァンギャルド以後の工芸-「工芸的なるもの」をもとめて" (2003), 美学出版
- 木田拓也, "工芸とナショナリズムの近代: 「日本的なもの」の創出" (2014), 吉川弘文館
- 工芸 シンポジウム記録集編集委員会, "美術史の余白に―工芸・アルス・現代美術" (2008), 美学出版
- 田中みなみ, "生活用具としての伝統的工芸品", デザイン学研究特集号, 8(2) (2001)
- 樋田豊次郎, "工芸の領分―工芸には生活感情が封印されている" (2006), 美学出版
- 前﨑信也, "大正時代の工芸教育" (2014), 宮帯出版社
- 森仁史, "日本“工芸”の近代―美術とデザインの母胎として,シリーズ近代美術のゆくえ" (2008), 吉川弘文館
- 三谷龍二他, "生活工芸,の時代" (2014), 新潮社
- 柳宗悅, "柳宗悅全集,全二十二卷 (計二十五冊)" (1980), 筑摩書房
