「~てくれる」と「-어 주다(~テクレル)」の 「恩恵」と「皮肉」
Favor and Sarcasm in Expressions Tekureru(てくれる)”and “Juda(주다)”
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Giving-and-Receiving Verbs in Japanese language have been studied for a long time from various perspectives. However, most of the existing literature focuses on the ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ , which is a common meaning function of 「-te yaru(-てやる)」(hereinafter, “-te yaru”) and「-te kureru(-てくれる)」(hereinafter, “-te kureru”). Despite the fact that there are both ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ and ‘irony(hiniku) usage’ of 「-te kureru」, there are not many studies that mention ‘irony(hiniku) usage’ of 「-te kureru」. Also, contrastive studies on Giving-and-Receiving Verbs in Japanese and Korean have been largely concentrated on ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ of 「-te yaru/kureru」 and the corresponding Korean expression「-a/e/ye cwuta(-아/어/여 주다 (-テ{ヤル/クレル}))」(hereinafter, “-e cwuta”). This paper examined the ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ and ‘irony(hiniku) usage’ of 「-te kureru」 and「-e cwuta」, which have not been studied together in Japanese-Korean contrastive linguistics. The findings are as follows: ① According to the context, 「-te kureru」 and 「-e cwuta」can be interpreted as benefactive(onkei) meaning or irony(hiniku) meaning. ② It is assumed that 「-te kureru」 and 「-e cwuta」 have the person involved in the event. However, there are cases where the person involved is manifested as a case, and sometimes involved as a person who expresses likability, gratitude, irony, and blame. 「-e cwuta」 is deeply involved in co-occurrence with the 「-eykey (-에게 (-に))」 case. ③ 「-e cwuta」 is more likely to be aware of the intention of the agent than 「-te kureru」, whereas 「-te kureru」 is neutral to the intention of the agent. ④Because 「-te kureru」 is related to the eligibility of the sentence by the preference of the event, 「-te kureru」has a higher degree of ‘benefit(onkeisei)’ than 「-e cwuta」.
Abstract
Giving-and-Receiving Verbs in Japanese language have been studied for a long time from various perspectives. However, most of the existing literature focuses on the ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ , which is a common meaning function of 「-te yaru(-てやる)」(hereinafter, “-te yaru”) and「-te kureru(-てくれる)」(hereinafter, “-te kureru”). Despite the fact that there are both ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ and ‘irony(hiniku) usage’ of 「-te kureru」, there are not many studies that mention ‘irony(hiniku) usage’ of 「-te kureru」. Also, contrastive studies on Giving-and-Receiving Verbs in Japanese and Korean have been largely concentrated on ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ of 「-te yaru/kureru」 and the corresponding Korean expression「-a/e/ye cwuta(-아/어/여 주다 (-テ{ヤル/クレル}))」(hereinafter, “-e cwuta”). This paper examined the ‘benefactive(onkei) usage’ and ‘irony(hiniku) usage’ of 「-te kureru」 and「-e cwuta」, which have not been studied together in Japanese-Korean contrastive linguistics. The findings are as follows: ① According to the context, 「-te kureru」 and 「-e cwuta」can be interpreted as benefactive(onkei) meaning or irony(hiniku) meaning. ② It is assumed that 「-te kureru」 and 「-e cwuta」 have the person involved in the event. However, there are cases where the person involved is manifested as a case, and sometimes involved as a person who expresses likability, gratitude, irony, and blame. 「-e cwuta」 is deeply involved in co-occurrence with the 「-eykey (-에게 (-に))」 case. ③ 「-e cwuta」 is more likely to be aware of the intention of the agent than 「-te kureru」, whereas 「-te kureru」 is neutral to the intention of the agent. ④Because 「-te kureru」 is related to the eligibility of the sentence by the preference of the event, 「-te kureru」has a higher degree of ‘benefit(onkeisei)’ than 「-e cwuta」.
참고문헌 (21)
- 尾鼻靖子, "授受表現「クレル」を使った皮肉・非難表現について", 言語と文化, 20, pp.1~15 (2017), 関西学院大学言語教育研究センター
- 澤田淳, "日本語の授与動詞構文の構文パターンの類型化―他言語との比較対照と合わせて―", 言語研究, 145, pp.27~60 (2014), 日本言語学会
- 豊田豊子, "日本語学校論集 1", pp.77~96 (1974), 東京外国語大学外国語学部付属日本語学校
- 韓京娥, "日本語の「~てあげる・くれる」と韓国語の「-e cwu-(~テアゲル・クレル)」の意味機能ー与格と共起している文を中心にー", 東京大学21世紀COEプログラム「心とことば-進化認知科学的展開」第3回研究会の発表レジュメ (2005)
- 韓京娥, "日本語の「~てあげる・くれる」と韓国語の「-e cwu-(~テアゲル・クレル)」の意味機能", 平成17年度日本語教育学会秋季大会予稿集, pp.223~228 (2005), 日本語教育学会
- 韓京娥, "日本語の「~てあげる・くれる」と韓国語の「-아", 어 주다-a, 日本語教育, pp.2008, 136[DOI]
- 한경아, "授受動詞の<皮肉>用法に関する日韓対照研究 ― 「皮肉」のメカニズムに注目して ―", 일본학보, (117), pp.61~78 (2018), 한국일본학회[DOI]
- 益岡隆志, "日本語における授受動詞と恩恵性", 言語, 30(5), pp.26~32 (2001), 大修館
- 森英樹, "『くれる』の求心性動詞化:giveとの対照研究", 福井県立大学論集, 44, pp.25~39 (2015), 福井県立大学
- 夏目漱石, "吾輩は猫である" (1961), 新潮文庫
- 夏目漱石, "나는 고양이로소이다" (2011), 문예출판사
- 江國香織, "号泣する準備はできていた", 新潮文庫
- 江國香織, "울 준비는 되어 있다" (2004), 소담출판사
- 위기철, "아홉살인생" (2001), 청년사
- 위기철, "9歳の人生" (1999), 河出書房新社
- 夏目漱石, "草枕" (1950), 新潮文庫
- 夏目漱石, "풀베개" (2013), 현암사
- 石田衣良, "4TEEN" (2005), 新潮文庫
- 石田衣良, "포틴" (2004), 작가정신
- 寺田寅彦, "青空文庫電子版", ~ (1922)
- 安岡明子, "『冬のソナタ』で始める韓国語シナリオ対訳集" (2003), キネマ旬報社
