言語活動を表すCAN-DO能力記述文の分析と実践研究
The analysis and action research of “CAN-DO” referring language activity
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines how effectively “CANDO”, provided by CEFR, has been utilized in Japanese education. This study also points out the function of both Common Framework of Reference for Languages and “CANDO”. Furthermore, after considering condition, utilization, strategy of making use of languages, this study mainly focuses on foreign language education as well as Japanese education in Korea. The ultimate purpose of this study is to make sure introducing “CANDO” into actual education based on quality evaluation. However, such assessment has not been systematically and generally introduced in the field of education. On the other hand, Japan has struggled to develop 『JFSTANDARD』 for Japanese education, learning, evaluation, provided by The Japan Foundation. It leads to widespread use of Japanese internationally and forges framework for competence of Japanese. Such desirable language education not only reinforces education through distinctive characteristics, but also becomes effective education activity of communication as regards global language learners.
Abstract
This study examines how effectively “CANDO”, provided by CEFR, has been utilized in Japanese education. This study also points out the function of both Common Framework of Reference for Languages and “CANDO”. Furthermore, after considering condition, utilization, strategy of making use of languages, this study mainly focuses on foreign language education as well as Japanese education in Korea. The ultimate purpose of this study is to make sure introducing “CANDO” into actual education based on quality evaluation. However, such assessment has not been systematically and generally introduced in the field of education. On the other hand, Japan has struggled to develop 『JFSTANDARD』 for Japanese education, learning, evaluation, provided by The Japan Foundation. It leads to widespread use of Japanese internationally and forges framework for competence of Japanese. Such desirable language education not only reinforces education through distinctive characteristics, but also becomes effective education activity of communication as regards global language learners.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김지선, "ピア・ラーニングにおける自己評価の試案－「Can-do」を活用した相互行為の自己評価 －", 일본근대학연구, (34), pp.85~100 (2011), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 정기영, "高校 大学のアーティキュレーションとCan doの可能性に関する考察 - J GAP韓国の場合 -", 日本語敎育, (67), pp.29~45 (2014), 한국일본어교육학회
- 青木惣一, "学習開始時と学習終了時のCan-do-statements 比較－プロフィシェンシー･テスト，オーラル･インタビューを外部基準として－", アメリカ･カナダ大学連合日本研究センター紀要, 29, pp.18~44 (2006), アメリカ･カナダ大学連合日本研究センター
- 嘉数勝美, "｢JF日本語教育スタンダード｣がめざす日本語能力とは何か", 早稲田日本語教育学 特集：日本語教育が育成する日本語能力とは何か, 9, pp.107~113 (2011), 早稲田大学大学院日本語教育研究科･早稲田大学日本語教育研究センター
- 検校裕郎, "Can do statementsによるルーブリック評価を取り入れた研修の実践報告", 한국일본학회 학술대회, pp.31~37 (2016), 한국일본학회
- 国際交流基金, "JF日本語教育スタンダード", 独立行政法人国際交流基金, 5~35 (2010)
- 小林安那, "Can-do statements に基づいた教材開発のための一考察", 한국일본어문학회 학술발표대회논문집, 4, pp.39~42 (2016), 한국일본어문학회
- 島田めぐみ, "Can-do statementsを利用した教育機関相互の日本語科目の対応づけ", 日本語教育, 141, pp.90~100 (2009), 日本語教育学会
- 真嶋潤子, "言語教育における到達度評価制度に向けて-CEFRを利用した大阪外国語大學の試み-", 日本語日本文化研究会, (創刊), pp.3~27 (2005), 日本語日本文化研究会
- 日本語Can-do-statements尺度の開発、平成13年度ー平成15年度科学研究費補助金研究成果報告書, "三枝令子", 5~34 (2004)
- 村上京子, "日本語学習者の能力記述によるレベル表示", 名古屋大学留学生センター紀要, 6, pp.49~60 (2008)
- Lenz, Peter, "A bank of descriptors for self-assessment in European Language Portfolios Council of Europe", 36~49 (2004)
- Little, David, "The Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Content, Purpose, Origin, Reception, and Impact", Language Teaching, 39(3), pp.167~190 (2006)
- North, Brian, "The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency", pp.285~309 (2000), Peter Long
- North, Brian, "Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment : Case Studies", pp.87~105 (2002)
- North, Brian, "The CEFR Common Reference Levels: Validated Reference Points and Local Strategies. Intergovernmental Policy Forum “The Common European Framework of Reference for languages(CEFR)and the development of Language Policies: Challenge and Responsibilities“", Council of Europe Language Policy Division, 12~21 (2007)
- Language Policy Unit, Strasbourg, "Common European Framework of Reference For Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment", pp.1~257 (2001), Cambridge Press