본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

三亭春馬としての天保後期における著作活動考 ― 人情本『多気競』の成立時期を中心に ―

Study on Work Activities as Santei-syunba in 1840-1844: Focusing on the Publication time of Ninzyobon “Takekurabe”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

“Takekurabe” is the first edition to seventh editons written by Santei󰠏syunba, the eighth edition to tenth editions written by Machuzono󰠏umehiko, and its publication time is confused. Therefore, as a result of bibliographically analyzing the four original texts using the preface and the signature as keywords, the following was found. The first, the period when the author confessed that he neglected creative activities “Gesaku” because of busyness at the end of the text of the fourth edition of “Takekurabe” published in 1842 was before 1839 when the first edition was published. And I guessed the busy reasons are edition of “Kyoka” and slapsticks involved in family business and divorce. Therefore, it is thought that divorced around 1838, and recovered around 1840. The second, it was estimated that the time of establishment of “Takekurabe” first edition to seventh edition was published around 1839 to 1844. In particular, I pointed out that the fourth edition was published after writing the preface in 1842, the sixth and seventh edition was published up to 1844, four years earlier than the common opinion and the ninth and tenth edition are not simultaneous publications. The third, the book which was rebuilt in conjunction with the release of 10th editions is in the collection of the University of Tokyo, and although it was crude by rearranging the preface, it was a text that can be seen the full text.

Abstract

“Takekurabe” is the first edition to seventh editons written by Santei󰠏syunba, the eighth edition to tenth editions written by Machuzono󰠏umehiko, and its publication time is confused. Therefore, as a result of bibliographically analyzing the four original texts using the preface and the signature as keywords, the following was found. The first, the period when the author confessed that he neglected creative activities “Gesaku” because of busyness at the end of the text of the fourth edition of “Takekurabe” published in 1842 was before 1839 when the first edition was published. And I guessed the busy reasons are edition of “Kyoka” and slapsticks involved in family business and divorce. Therefore, it is thought that divorced around 1838, and recovered around 1840. The second, it was estimated that the time of establishment of “Takekurabe” first edition to seventh edition was published around 1839 to 1844. In particular, I pointed out that the fourth edition was published after writing the preface in 1842, the sixth and seventh edition was published up to 1844, four years earlier than the common opinion and the ninth and tenth edition are not simultaneous publications. The third, the book which was rebuilt in conjunction with the release of 10th editions is in the collection of the University of Tokyo, and although it was crude by rearranging the preface, it was a text that can be seen the full text.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. 石川了, "江戸狂歌壇史の研究", pp.301~315 (2011), 汲古書院
  2. 강지현, "三代目一九こと初代三亭春馬の錯綜する小伝・戯号再考", 日本學硏究, 56, pp.53~82 (2019), 일본연구소
  3. 강지현, "三亭春馬としての天保前・中期における著作活動考", 日本語敎育, (87), pp.125~138 (2019), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
  4. 国文学研究資料館, "人情本事典―江戸文政期、娘たちの小説", pp.1~231 (2010), 笠間書院
  5. 佐藤至子, "江戸の出版統制; 弾圧に翻弄された戯作者たち", pp.172~216 (2017), 吉川弘文館
  6. 日本古典文学大辞典編集委員会, "日本古典文学大辞典 四巻", pp.144~ (1986), 岩波書店
  7. 山崎麓, "人情本雑記(三)", 江戸時代文化, 4(8), pp.24~27 (1930), 江戸時代文化研究会[DOI]
  8. "日本国語大辞典"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)