三亭春馬としての天保前・中期における著作活動考

Abstract

As a result of discussing bibliographically the work of 1832 to 1840 who was active as Santei󰠏syunba, the following was found out. The first, I understood the relationship of the group around the renaming. It is Ikku Ⅱ’s introduction in maiden work the Gokan “Ogata󰠏rinsyoden”, and he wrote “Ba” character in the rake in the same maiden work Ninzyobon “Huzoku󰠏azumaotoko”, “in 1833” it is the year to extensively show the renaming to Santei󰠏syunba. The second, I pointed out the possibility that circumstances such as divorce were the reasons for the change in the author of the three versions “Huzoku󰠏azumaotoko” and the reason for delaying the publication of “Youchisoga󰠏ningyozitate” two volumes. It is certain that at least the level problem of the work (such as bad reputation of the reader) was not the cause. The third, I pointed out circumstances in the family about the stagnation period of Gesaku and resumption. In other words, it seems that it was the time of working in the family business in 1836 when there was no work of writing. Then I think that Ikku Ⅱ have resumed Gesaku activities not only because of the economic circumstance due to divorce but also because Ikku Ⅱ escaped from Edo in 1837.