본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

十字亭三九の文政末期・天保初期著作活動について

About the Writing Activity of Zyuzitei-sanku from 1828 to 1832

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

As a result of searching the bibliographic point of view of the book from 1828 when he became a disciple of Jippesya to 1832 when the name “Zyuzitei󰠏sanku” had become widely known, it was found the following things. First, what are “Kankosya󰠏chutamaru” and “sanchyo” as the authors of the“Seiro󰠏irodosi” published in 1828, and “Tokai󰠏sanzin” as the editor? As a result of investigating their identity, which was apt to be confused with Itoi, each of three was a different person. Also, based on bibliographic research, we could reinforce and retouch the precedent that Tokai󰠏sanzin was Itoi. I pointed out the following two points as my basis for previous reason. (1)I suggested the possibility that Chinpotei󰠏tanenori is Itoi(another name is Tokai󰠏sanzin).(2)In addition to precedent that Sanchyo, who appears in the Ninzyobon “Kirino󰠏hitoha”, is Gozitei󰠏sanchyo (and he is not Zyuzitei󰠏sanku.) and the possibility that Sanchyo, who appears in the book “Kirino󰠏hitoha” is a warrior of the Aki Domain “Syokaro󰠏sanchyo” is coexisted. Second, by focusing “Dozikun󰠏irohatanka” and as the text “Irohawake󰠏edonomeisyo”, I demonstrated that it can be seen Itoi's attitude of emphasizing that Itoi who moved to a disciple of Zippensya in 1828 as “Tosensya renamed Zyuzitei” is Zyuzitei Sanku until 1832.

Abstract

As a result of searching the bibliographic point of view of the book from 1828 when he became a disciple of Jippesya to 1832 when the name “Zyuzitei󰠏sanku” had become widely known, it was found the following things. First, what are “Kankosya󰠏chutamaru” and “sanchyo” as the authors of the“Seiro󰠏irodosi” published in 1828, and “Tokai󰠏sanzin” as the editor? As a result of investigating their identity, which was apt to be confused with Itoi, each of three was a different person. Also, based on bibliographic research, we could reinforce and retouch the precedent that Tokai󰠏sanzin was Itoi. I pointed out the following two points as my basis for previous reason. (1)I suggested the possibility that Chinpotei󰠏tanenori is Itoi(another name is Tokai󰠏sanzin).(2)In addition to precedent that Sanchyo, who appears in the Ninzyobon “Kirino󰠏hitoha”, is Gozitei󰠏sanchyo (and he is not Zyuzitei󰠏sanku.) and the possibility that Sanchyo, who appears in the book “Kirino󰠏hitoha” is a warrior of the Aki Domain “Syokaro󰠏sanchyo” is coexisted. Second, by focusing “Dozikun󰠏irohatanka” and as the text “Irohawake󰠏edonomeisyo”, I demonstrated that it can be seen Itoi's attitude of emphasizing that Itoi who moved to a disciple of Zippensya in 1828 as “Tosensya renamed Zyuzitei” is Zyuzitei Sanku until 1832.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 井上隆明, "改訂増補 近世書林板元総覧", pp.739~ (1998), 青裳堂書店
  2. 강지현, "磯川南嶺・東船笑登満人の文政中期著作活動について", 일어일문학연구, 113, pp.217~239 (2020), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  3. 康志賢, "〈膝栗毛もの〉作品群の書誌『その図様継承史の一環として』", 国語国文, 923, pp.36~55 (2011), 京都大学国語国文学会
  4. 近世文学読書会, "『東京大学所蔵草双紙目録』 二編", pp.214~ (2000), 青裳堂書店
  5. 洒落本大成編集委員会, "洒落本大成 28巻", pp.78~428 (1978), 中央公論社
  6. 神保五弥, "為永春水の研究", pp.301~302 (1964), 白日社
  7. 棚橋正博, "戯作者列伝17、十返舎一九『中本と戯号", 日本古書通信, pp.28~29 (2008), 日本古書通信社
  8. 中山尚夫, "十返舎一九研究", pp.250~ (2002), おうふう
  9. 武藤元昭, "文政期人情本の一側面―「桐の一葉」をめぐって―", 国語国文, 42(6), pp.68~75 (1973), 京都大学国語国文学会
  10. 山杢誠, "為永春水年譜稿、その四", 東洋大学大学院紀要, (32), pp.138~140 (1996)
  11. 山杢誠, "二世十返舎一九と為永春水", 白山国文, (1), pp.28~29 (1997), 東洋大学国語国文学会

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)