본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

균질적/비균질적 시선의 패러독스와 젠더 ― 『산시로(三四郞)』에 내재된 젠더의 맥락화와 비평의 가능성 ―

Gender and Paradox from Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Perspectives: Contextualization of Gender and Possibilities of Criticism within ‘Sansiro’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study aimed to investigate the image of women portrayed by male writer during the Meiji era, by analyzing ‘Sansiro’ by Natsume Souseki. First, as there was a desire to be on par with the western world, when discussing the modern times and modernization of Japan, the “subjectivity” of women was emphasized with culture, in particular skin color, makeup, and eyes, just as how men and women were presented as “the subjects” in the West. However, the “female culture” ended up becoming generic, created based on the “homogeneous” male perspective. That is, rather than accepting the cultural diversity, female culture was described to be homogeneous, or standardized. On the contrary, when discussing male󰠏female relationships, it was possible to identify male “inhomogeneous” perspectives that only acknowledge the subjectivity of men, as men were perceived to be the subject, whereas women were perceived to be “the others.” It was identified that the social habitus of the times, as the notions related to sex, relationship, marriage, and divorce were based on the idea that women were in “vassalage” to men. Second, the images of women portrayed by men could be divided into two types. Although the author described Mineko as an independent woman who leads men and has “economic power” despite the fact that women were considered incapable at the time, she ended up marrying a bourgeois man to become a “selfish and practical woman.” On the other hand, the “ideal woman” was described to be an “innocent woman with a strong maternal image,” someone who has strong feminine traits like Yosiko. The author introduced many different women as if he was describing the “rupture of the single female image,” but ultimately, the limitation of the work was that women were classified into two types, and that only women whom “men can handle” were accepted. At the same time, it showed “the possibilities of gender󰠏free” in Mineko. However, there is a limitation in that although Mineko attempted to secure subjectivity by escaping from the existing gender norms, she eventually compromised with reality when faced with such gender norms, and internalized them in the end.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the image of women portrayed by male writer during the Meiji era, by analyzing ‘Sansiro’ by Natsume Souseki. First, as there was a desire to be on par with the western world, when discussing the modern times and modernization of Japan, the “subjectivity” of women was emphasized with culture, in particular skin color, makeup, and eyes, just as how men and women were presented as “the subjects” in the West. However, the “female culture” ended up becoming generic, created based on the “homogeneous” male perspective. That is, rather than accepting the cultural diversity, female culture was described to be homogeneous, or standardized. On the contrary, when discussing male󰠏female relationships, it was possible to identify male “inhomogeneous” perspectives that only acknowledge the subjectivity of men, as men were perceived to be the subject, whereas women were perceived to be “the others.” It was identified that the social habitus of the times, as the notions related to sex, relationship, marriage, and divorce were based on the idea that women were in “vassalage” to men. Second, the images of women portrayed by men could be divided into two types. Although the author described Mineko as an independent woman who leads men and has “economic power” despite the fact that women were considered incapable at the time, she ended up marrying a bourgeois man to become a “selfish and practical woman.” On the other hand, the “ideal woman” was described to be an “innocent woman with a strong maternal image,” someone who has strong feminine traits like Yosiko. The author introduced many different women as if he was describing the “rupture of the single female image,” but ultimately, the limitation of the work was that women were classified into two types, and that only women whom “men can handle” were accepted. At the same time, it showed “the possibilities of gender󰠏free” in Mineko. However, there is a limitation in that although Mineko attempted to secure subjectivity by escaping from the existing gender norms, she eventually compromised with reality when faced with such gender norms, and internalized them in the end.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김소희, "『三四郎』에 나타난 여성의 표상 -미네코의 의식구조를 중심으로-", 日本語文學, 1(79), pp.207~228 (2018), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
  2. 권덕희, "나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의 『산시로(三四郞)』에 나타난 여성상", 석사, 일어교육, pp.2007
  3. 권영주, "나쓰메소세키(夏目漱石)의 『산시로(삼사랑)』론 : 작품 속 작가의 여성상 중심으로", 석사, 일어교육, pp.2004
  4. 주디스 버틀러저, "젠더트러블", pp.1~376 (2009), 문학동네
  5. 프란츠 파농, "검은 피부, 하얀 가면", pp.1~287 (2014), 문학동네
  6. 피에르 부르디, "페미니즘과 섹시즘", pp.186~ (2018), ㈜르몽드코리아
  7. 팸 모리스, "문학과 페미니즘", pp.1~350 (1999), 문예출판사
  8. 한도일, "나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의 『산시로(三四郞)』에 나타난 근대문명 비평", 석사, 일어교육, pp.2007
  9. 熊坂郭子, "漱石作品論集成 第5卷 三四郞", pp.185~ (1991), おうふう社
  10. 坂上博一, "國文學", pp.54~ (1982), 學燈社
  11. 佐藤泉, "夏目漱石における「日本近代」と「近代」の問題", 박사, pp.1998
  12. 土屋知子, "夏目漱石『三四郎』の比較文化的研究", 박사, pp.2011
  13. 中川善之助, "家族制度全集 法律編 離婚", pp.29~ (1937), 河出書房
  14. 夏目漱石, "三四郞", pp.1~298 (2003), 新潮文庫
  15. 穂積中遠, "離婚制度の研究", pp.587~ (1924), 改造社
  16. 登尾豊, "國文學", pp.3~ (1991), 學燈社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)