근대 일본의 가부장제 시스템과 『세이토』
Patriarchal System and Seito of Modern Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Until now, the ‘Ie’ system, the distinct Japanese Family system, was dominantly recognized as the vestige of former feudal system. But as the research for gender-especially the family history-gets active, various aspects showing that ‘Ie’ is the modern product developed through thoroughly intended plans of Meiji government after latter-day. According to Ueno Chizuko, ‘Ie’ system is not at all a traditional feudal system, but it rather is the family revised by modernization, in other word, it is the Japanese version of modern family. This words began with it being the study of goodwill, and recognizing that ‘Ie’ is the creation of modernization, and as well as the need to listen to the new woman’s inner voice under the Japanese patriarchal system. The most appealing characteristic of modern Japanese patriarchal system is that the it needs only the family members who are dedicated to the ‘Nation’. With this, women were expected to submit to the authority and their roles, which are, as a wife and mother who obeys by supporting, preserving, and maintaining the patriarchal system. But as the new women themselves expressed their independence, these roles are hard to be expected. It was no other than new women’s magazine Seito which arose against the Japanese patriarchal system. In this statement, careful observation was done on the novel based on tiny internal conflicts or the aspects of anguish, that could not have been illustrated enough after judging the significant issues of early modern liberalism of women based on new women’s editorials, discussions, that were illustrated most directly and compressively. Through this, it was pointed out that Seito magazine is not consisted logically, and that reason for that is the female authors’ different desires were tangled and it reflects the complicated situation of that period whether they were intended or not. Overall, unlike the literatures (men-centered) of same era, the genre of literature or the novel did not put them on prerogative place, and confirmation could be made once again that the women’s writing aspects are related closely with gender recognition more than anything.
Abstract
Until now, the ‘Ie’ system, the distinct Japanese Family system, was dominantly recognized as the vestige of former feudal system. But as the research for gender-especially the family history-gets active, various aspects showing that ‘Ie’ is the modern product developed through thoroughly intended plans of Meiji government after latter-day. According to Ueno Chizuko, ‘Ie’ system is not at all a traditional feudal system, but it rather is the family revised by modernization, in other word, it is the Japanese version of modern family. This words began with it being the study of goodwill, and recognizing that ‘Ie’ is the creation of modernization, and as well as the need to listen to the new woman’s inner voice under the Japanese patriarchal system. The most appealing characteristic of modern Japanese patriarchal system is that the it needs only the family members who are dedicated to the ‘Nation’. With this, women were expected to submit to the authority and their roles, which are, as a wife and mother who obeys by supporting, preserving, and maintaining the patriarchal system. But as the new women themselves expressed their independence, these roles are hard to be expected. It was no other than new women’s magazine Seito which arose against the Japanese patriarchal system. In this statement, careful observation was done on the novel based on tiny internal conflicts or the aspects of anguish, that could not have been illustrated enough after judging the significant issues of early modern liberalism of women based on new women’s editorials, discussions, that were illustrated most directly and compressively. Through this, it was pointed out that Seito magazine is not consisted logically, and that reason for that is the female authors’ different desires were tangled and it reflects the complicated situation of that period whether they were intended or not. Overall, unlike the literatures (men-centered) of same era, the genre of literature or the novel did not put them on prerogative place, and confirmation could be made once again that the women’s writing aspects are related closely with gender recognition more than anything.
참고문헌 (35)
- "青鞜 復刻版" (1983), 不二出版
- 平塚らいてう, "元始女性は太陽であった ー青鞜発刊に際して", 青鞜(1-1), ~
- 田村俊子, "生血", 青鞜(1-1), ~
- 伊藤野枝, "新らしき女の道", 青鞜(3-1), ~
- 伊藤野枝, "わがまま", 青鞜(3-12), ~
- 伊藤野枝, "惑ひ", 青鞜(4-4), ~
- 加藤みどり, "高窓の下", 青鞜(1-4), ~
- 加藤みどり, "執着", 青鞜(2-4), ~
- 加藤みどり, "別れての二三日", 青鞜(4-4), ~
- 加藤みどり, "「新らしい女」に就いて", 青鞜(3-1), ~
- 尾島菊子, "ある夜", 青鞜(1-2), ~
- 岡田ゆき, "水神の崇", 青鞜(5-5), ~
- 荒木郁子, "道子", 青鞜(1-3), ~
- 荒木郁子, "手紙", 青鞜(2-4), ~
- 川田よし, "脱れられぬ人", 青鞜(4-1), ~
- 斎賀琴, "夜汽車", 青鞜(4-4), ~
- 有田勢伊, "AとK子", 青鞜(5-3), ~
- 上田君, "旅", 青鞜(2-4), ~
- 神崎恒, "タイピスト", 青鞜(2-4), ~
- 岩野清, "暗闘", 青鞜(2-4), ~
- 岩野清, "人類として男性と女性は平等である", 青鞜(3-1), ~
- 野上弥生子, "新らしき命", 青鞜(4-4), ~
- 川田よし, "紅き木の芽", 青鞜(4-4), ~
- 福田英, "婦人問題の解決", 青鞜 (3-1), ~
- 上杉真吉, "新しい良妻賢母主義", 太陽 近時之婦人問題 號, 1913.6, ~ (1913)
- 生田花世, "青鞜』の思い出", 国文学 解釈と鑑賞, ~ (1963)
- 平塚らいてう, "わたくしの歩いた道" (1955), 新評論社
- 平塚らいてう, "平塚らいてう著作集 4" (1983), 大月書店
- 上野千鶴子, "近代家族の成立と終焉" (1995), 岩波書店
- 牟田和恵, "戦略としての家族: 近代日本の国民国家形成と女性" (1996), 新曜社
- 大越愛子, "近代日本のジェンダー: 現代日本の思想的課題を問う" (1997), 三一書 房
- 日本文學協會, "『青鞜』を読む" (1998), 学藝書林
- 米田佐代子, "『青鞜』を學ぶ人のために" (1999), 世界思想社
- らいてう研究会, "『青鞜』人物事典 110人の群像" (2001), 大修舘書店
- 阿部恒久, "日本近現代女性史" (2000), 芙蓉書房出版
