운동감각적 피드백이 발레동작 학습효과에 미치는 영향
The effects of kinematic feedback on ballet movement learning
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was investgate the effects of kinematic feedback on learning of ballet movement. This study to present empirical data basis on the kinematic feedback in ballet education and establish the guideline required for ballet movement learning. In this study, 20 ballet dancers were required to practice ballet enchainement (battement tendu - grand battement - petit jeté - grand jeté) task in two different practice condition (kinematic feedback group, Non-kinematic feedback group) ten times each day during 5days. The experimental design was 2(kinematic feedback condition) × 2(test) factorial design with repeated measures on test. Pre-post test performance score was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and retention test scores was analyzed with t-test. The results were as follows,In performance stage, the main effects of feedback was not significant statistically; the main effects of test was not significant; the interactive effects of feedback and test were not significant, also. However in learning stage, the result of retention test showed a significant difference of .05, especially the effect on grand battement movement. This result supports the result of previous studies that the kinematic feedback are more effective on a slow movement than a fast one, suggesting that the kinematic feedback is an important factor for improvement of the understanding in the phase of retention. Consequently, kinematic feedback might be effective on a ballet movement involving the degree of difficulty of mid-level rather than too high or low-level, and a ballet movement constituted with slow tempos than fast ones.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was investgate the effects of kinematic feedback on learning of ballet movement. This study to present empirical data basis on the kinematic feedback in ballet education and establish the guideline required for ballet movement learning. In this study, 20 ballet dancers were required to practice ballet enchainement (battement tendu - grand battement - petit jeté - grand jeté) task in two different practice condition (kinematic feedback group, Non-kinematic feedback group) ten times each day during 5days. The experimental design was 2(kinematic feedback condition) × 2(test) factorial design with repeated measures on test. Pre-post test performance score was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and retention test scores was analyzed with t-test. The results were as follows,In performance stage, the main effects of feedback was not significant statistically; the main effects of test was not significant; the interactive effects of feedback and test were not significant, also. However in learning stage, the result of retention test showed a significant difference of .05, especially the effect on grand battement movement. This result supports the result of previous studies that the kinematic feedback are more effective on a slow movement than a fast one, suggesting that the kinematic feedback is an important factor for improvement of the understanding in the phase of retention. Consequently, kinematic feedback might be effective on a ballet movement involving the degree of difficulty of mid-level rather than too high or low-level, and a ballet movement constituted with slow tempos than fast ones.
참고문헌 (26)
- 기한준, "운동학적 피드백이 운동기능학습에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.1994
- 김윤진, "과제정보 제시방법이 무용동작 학습에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.1996
- 문 영, "피드백 제공방식에 따른 무용수의 기술수준별 동작수행 효과", 대한무용학회지, (31), pp.142~144 (2000)
- 문영, "무용능력검사개발을 위한 무용수행능력의 요인구조 탐색 연구", 한국무용과학회지, 8(17), pp.81~98 (2008), 한국무용과학회
- 박현정, "수행지식 제공빈도에 따른 무용동작 학습의 효과", 석사, pp.2004
- 서유진, "무용스텝 지도 시 피드백의 제시형태 및 시기에 따른 학습결과 비교", 석사, pp.2003
- 이계영, "언어적 과제정보 제시 형태에 따른 무용동작 학습 효과", 석사, pp.1999
- 이지현, "운동기술 학습에서 신체적 가이던스의 효과", 석사, pp.2004
- 정윤경, "피드백 제시형태와 시기에 따른 무용동작 학습의 효과", 석사, pp.2000
- 최진주, "목표설정과 피드백 유무에 따른 운동학습 효과", 석사, pp.2009
- Adams,J.A, "A closed-loop theory of motor learning", Journal of motor behavior, 3, pp.111~149 (1971)
- Annett, J, "Knowledge of results and skilled performance", Occupational Psychology, 31, pp.69~79 (1957)
- Armstrong, T. R, "Training for the production of memorized movement patterns", University of Michigan, Human Performance Center, ~ (1970)
- Hatze, H, "Biomechanical aspects of successful motion optimization", pp.7~17 (1976), University Park Press
- Lee, T. D, "On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: Exploring the guidance hypothesis", Journal of Motor behavior, 22, pp.191~208 (1990)
- Magill, R. A, "Motor learning : concepts and applications" (1993), Wm. C. Brown & Behavior
- Newell, K. M, "Augmented information feedback and the acquisition of isometric tasks", Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, pp.4~12 (1987)
- Newell, K. M, "Kinematic information feedback for skilled performance", Human Learning, 4, pp.39~56 (1985)
- Newell, K. M, "Kinematic and Kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition", Journal of Human Movement Studies, 7, pp.235~254 (1981)
- Rothstein, A. L, "Bridging the gap: Application of research on videotape feedback and bowling", Theory Into Practice, 1, pp.35~62 (1976)
- Salmoni, R. W, "Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal", Psychological Bulletin, 95, pp.355~386 (1984)
- Schmidt,R.A, "Motor control and learning; A behavioral emphasis" (1988), Human Kinetics
- Schmidt, R. A, "Motor learning & performance" (1991), Human Nineties
- Schmidt, R. A, "Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, pp.352~359 (1989)
- Schmidt, R. A, "Augmented kinematic feedback for motor learning", Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(3), pp.261~273 (1992)
- Wallace, S. A, "Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill", Research Quarterly, 50, pp.265~271 (1979)