창의성 교육의 성적평가방식에 따른 창의적 자기효능감 변화 연구
A Study on Change in Creative Self-Efficacy According to the Grading Method of Creativity Education
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 대학 수업으로 제공되는 창의성 교육의 성적평가방식 차이가 창의적 자기효능감 변화를 일으키는지 파악하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구대상은 서울 소재 C대학의 창의성 교육 A.C.T.를 수강한 대학생들로2018년 1학기부터 2019년 2학기까지 총 4개 학기 19개 분반 787명이다. 선행연구를 통해 예술창작활동으로 이뤄진 A.C.T.가 창의적 자기효능감을 향상시킨다는 것이 밝혀졌다. 창의적 자기효능감의 특성과 형성체계에 관한 세부적인 접근을 위하여 성적평가방식의 차이가 있는 두 그룹을 탐색하였다. 이론 평가방식인 A유형으로 성적평가가 이뤄진 그룹A와 실기 평가방식인 B유형으로 평가받은 그룹B, 두 집단을 대상으로 창의적 자기효능감 척도를 활용하여 사전-사후 설문 조사 자료를 수집하였다. 자료 분석은 SPSS/WIN 통계프로그램22.0을 활용했으며 먼저 집단 간 동질성을 알아보기 위해 독립표본 t-test를 시행하였다. 집단 간 차이를 알아보기 위해 단변인공변량분석(ANCOVA)을 실시하였으며 차이의 크기를 검증하기 위해 코헨의 효과크기(Cohen’d)를 활용하였다. 본 연구 결과 성적평가방식의 차이는 창의적 자기효능감의 변화 차이를 일으켰다. 두 집단의 차이는 사전검사부터 사후검사에 이르기까지 존재했으며, 실기유형으로 평가한 그룹B의 창의적 자기효능감 향상 수준이 이론유형으로 평가한 그룹A보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높게 측정되었다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the grading method of creativity education provided as a university course causes change to creative self-efficacy. The subjects were 787 university students divided into 19 classes during four semesters who took the common liberal arts course Action Communication Teamwork (A.C.T.) from the first semester of 2018 to the second semester of 2019 at Seoul’s C University. Previous studies proved that participating in artistic activities in A.C.T. increases creative self-efficacy. To explore the characteristics and formation system of creative self-efficacy in more detail, two groups with different grading methods were examined: Group A was graded by Type A, a theory-based assessment method, and Group B was graded by Type B, a practice- based assessment method. Data from the pretest-posttest surveys were collected using the creative self-efficacy scale. SPSS/WIN Statistics 22.0 was used for data analysis, and an independent samples t-test was conducted to determine homogeneity between the groups. ANCOVA was conducted to determine the difference between the groups, and Cohen's was used to verify the size of the difference. The results showed that the difference in the grading method affected creative self-efficacy. The difference between the two groups existed throughout the pretest and posttest; Group B showed a smaller level of difference than Group A.
참고문헌 (36)
- 이경화, "대학생의 창의성 교육에 대한 인식", 교육심리연구, 24(2), pp.327~346 (2010), 한국교육심리학회
- 신종호, "창의적 자기효능감이 실수에 대한 인식을 매개로 창의적 수행에 미치는 영향: 도전 목표의 조절된 매개효과", 창의력교육연구, 18(1), pp.1~21 (2018), 한국창의력교육학회[DOI]
- 최민지, "예술창작활동이 창의적 자기효능감에 미치는 영향: C대학 교양수업 사례를 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(22), pp.165~190 (2017), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 최민지, "창의적 자기효능감에 긍정적으로 작용하는 예술창작활동의 속성 탐색", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(22), pp.165~194 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- 최민지, "예술창작활동에 따른 대학생의 창의적 자기효능감 차이와 변화 연구: 성별과 소속을 중심으로", 예술교육연구, 18(1), pp.141~154 (2020), 한국예술교육학회
- 하유경, "대학생용 창의적 자기효능감 척도의 개발과 타당화", 한국심리학회지:학교, 13(1), pp.55~78 (2016), 한국심리학회산하학교심리학회[DOI]
- 한기순, "우리는 진정 창의성을 원하는가?:반창의성 편향에 관한 담론", 창의력교육연구, 13(3), pp.53~70 (2013), 한국창의력교육학회
- Amabile, T. M., "The social psychology of creativity" (1983), Springer-Verlag
- Amabile, T. M., "A model of creativity and innovation in organizations", Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, pp.123~167 (1988)
- 윤운성, "변화하는 사회속에서의 자기효능감" (2004), 학지사
- Bandura, A., "자기효능감과 삶의 질: 교육․건강․운동․조직에서의 성취" (2007), 교육과학사
- Beghetto, R. A., "Creative self‐efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students", Creativity Research Journal, 18, pp.447~457 (2006)
- Beghetto, R. A., "Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), pp.342~349 (2011)
- Beghetto, R. A., "Classroom contexts for creativity", High Ability Studies, 25, pp.53~69 (2014)
- Byrge, C, "Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, pp.51~61 (2015)
- Cropley, A. J., "The dark side of creativity", pp.297~315 (2008), Cambridge
- Eisenberger, R., "Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation", Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), pp.121~130 (2003)
- Elliot, A. J., "Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals", Educational Psychologist, 34, pp.149~169 (1999)
- Elliot, A. J., "A 3 x 2 achievement goal model", Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, pp.632~648 (2011)
- Gajda, A., "Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis", Educational Psychology, 109(2), pp.269~299 (2017)
- Gerhart, B., "Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs", Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, pp.489~521 (2015)
- Gralewski, J., "Are teachers’ ratings of students’ creativity related to students’ divergent thinking? a meta-analysis", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, pp.17~31 (2019)
- Karwowski, M., "It doesn't hurt to ask...but sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students' creative self‐efficacy and its predictors", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, pp.154~164 (2011)
- Karwowski, M., "Did curiosity kill the cat? relationship between trait curiosity, creative self‐efficacy and creative personal identity", Europe's Journal of Psychology, 8, pp.547~558 (2012)
- Karwowski, M., "Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, pp.62~70 (2014)
- Karwowski, M., "The dynamics of creative self‐concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self‐efficacy and creative potential identity", Creativity Research Journal, 28, pp.99~104 (2016)
- Karwowski, M., "How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of role play training in creativity", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), pp.163~171 (2008)
- Mathisen, G. E., "Creative self‐efficacy: An intervention study", International Journal of Educational Research, 48, pp.21~29 (2009)
- Meinel, M., "Exploring the effects of creativity training on creative performance and creative self-efficacy: Evidence from a longitudinal study", Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), pp.546~558 (2018)
- Puente-Diaz, R., "Creative self‐efficacy: An exploration of its antecedents, consequences and applied implications", The Journal of Psychology : Interdisciplinary and Applied, 150, pp.175~195 (2016)
- Puente-Diaz, R., "An exploration of some antecedents and consequences of creative self‐efficacy among college students", Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(3), pp.256~266 (2018)
- Runco, M. A., "Meta-creativity: Being creative about creativity", Creativity Research Journal, 27(3), pp.295~298 (2015)
- Tang, M., "An interdisciplinary and intercultural approach to creativity and innovation: Evaluation of the emci erasmus intensive program", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, pp.268~278 (2017)
- Tierney, P., "Creative self‐efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance", Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp.1137~1148 (2002)
- Tierney, P., "The pygmalion process and employee creativity", Journal of Management, 30(3), pp.413~432 (2004)
- Tierney, P., "Creative self‐efficacy development and creative performance over time", Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, pp.277~293 (2011)
