본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전유성이 연구개발협력 및 제품혁신성과에 미치는 영향: 정부 연구개발지원의 조절된 매개효과를 중심으로

An Effect of Appropriability on R&D Collaboration and Product Innovation Performance: Focusing on the Moderated Mediation of Government R&D Support

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기술정책

초록

연구개발의 비용과 속도가 증가하고 있는 현대의 경쟁환경에서 기술혁신을 창출하기 위해 필요한 모든 자원 및 역량을 갖추는 것은 불가능에 가까우며 이와 같은 환경은연구개발협력의 필요성을 강조한다. 따라서 본 논문은 지식의 보호수단인 전유성이 연구개발협력과 그 성과물인 제품혁신성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석하였다. 동시에 이 관계를정부 연구개발지원이 어떻게 조절하고 영향을 미치는지 탐색적으로 실증분석 하였다. 연구결과, 전유성이 연구개발협력을 경유하여 제품혁신성과에 미치는 간접효과는 정부의재무적, 직접적, 간접적 연구개발지원 각각의 유형 모두에서 공통적인 패턴을 보였다. 전유성이 수직적 연구개발협력을 경유하여 제품혁신성과에 미치는 조건부간접효과는 정부 연구개발지원의 강도가 일정수준 이상에서 증가하면 할수록 그 효과 역시 증가하였다. 반면, 수평적 연구개발협력을 경유한 조건부간접효과의 경우 모든 정부 연구개발지원 강도에서 유의하지 않았다. 혁신과 관련된 정부 연구개발지원 정책을 조절변수로 설정하여 조절된 매개분석을 수행한다면, 정책의 유의한 정책강도 및 그에 따른 성과를 분석할 수 있다. 따라서 본 논문의 활용은 정부 연구개발지원의 평가와 효과적인 정책수립에 기여할 것으로 판단된다

Abstract

It is almost impossible for firms to possess all of resources and capabilities needed to create technological innovations in modern competitive environment. This situation forces firms to conduct R&D collaboration. Therefore, this paper analyzes an effect of appropriability protecting knowledge exclusively on R&D collaboration and product innovation performance. In addition, we investigate how the governmental R&D support moderates and influences those relationships through empirical analysis. The results of moderated mediation show that the impact of appropriability on product innovation performance appears to be a common pattern in each conditional indirect effect of appropriability regardless of financial, direct, indirect R&D support of the government. The more governmental R&D supports increase over a certain level, the more conditional indirect effects of appropriability on product innovation performance increase through the vertical R&D collaboration. However, conditional indirect effects of appropriability through horizontal R&D collaboration are not significant in all levels of government R&D supports. If we utilize an analysis of moderated mediation by applying governmental R&D supports as a moderator, it is possible to analyze a significant strength of innovation policies and their performance. Therefore, this paper would make a contribution to evolution of governmental R&D support and an effective formulation of innovation policy.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 고현수, "방산기업의 기술혁신 특성과 성공요인 그리고 정부지원효과에 관한 연구", 산업혁신연구, 31(1), pp.139~163 (2015), 산업개발연구소
  2. 김대진, "기업의 전략 및 정부 지원 정책이 기업 성과에 미치는 영향: 혁신형 인증을 중심으로", 벤처창업연구, 11(1), pp.13~27 (2016), 한국벤처창업학회
  3. 이후성, "정부 R&D지원 유형에 따른 중소기업 기술적 성과 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1), pp.73~97 (2015), 한국기술혁신학회
  4. 중소기업의 기술혁신체제, "정선양", 과학기술정책관리연구소, ~ (1997)
  5. 최은영, "기술혁신에 대한 R&D투자와 전유성의 역할에 관한 연구", 시장경제연구, 44(3), pp.81~105 (2015), 지암남덕우경제연구원
  6. 2010년도 한국의 기술혁신조사: 제조업부분, "하태정", 과학기술정책연구원, ~ (2010)
  7. 황남웅, "기술협력 활동이 기업의 제품혁신 성과에 미치는 영향: 전유성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 22(1), pp.59~88 (2014), 기술경영경제학회[DOI]
  8. 황정태, "혁신을 위한 외부협력이 중소기업성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 다각적 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 13(2), pp.332~364 (2010), 한국기술혁신학회
  9. Alexy, O., "Does IP Strategy Have to Cripple Open Innovation?", MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), pp.71~77 (2009)
  10. Amara, N., "Managing the Protection of Innovations in Knowledge-intensive Business Services", Research Policy, 37, pp.1530~1547 (2008)
  11. Arranz, N., "The Choice of Partners in R&D Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Firms", Technovation, 28, pp.88~100 (2008)
  12. Arrow, K., "The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors", pp.609~626 (1962), Princeton University Press
  13. Audretsch, D. B., "Financial Signaling by Innovative Nascent Ventures: The Relevance of Patents and Prototypes", Research Policy, 41, pp.1407~1421 (2012)
  14. Baron, R. M., "The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)
  15. Baum, J. A. C., "Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality", Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), pp.187~218 (1991)
  16. Cassiman, B., "R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium", American Economic Review, 92(4), pp.1169~1184 (2002)
  17. Chesbrough, H., "Open Innovation" (2003), Harvard University Press
  18. Chesbrough, H., "Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape" (2006), Harvard Business School Press
  19. Chesbrough, H., "Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm" (2006), Oxford University Press
  20. Efficiency of Public Spending In Support of R&D Activities, "Cincera, M.", Directorate General Economic and Monetary Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission, ~ (2009)
  21. Cohen, W. M., "R&D Spillovers: Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States", Research Policy, 31(8-9), pp.1349~1367 (2002)
  22. Cohen, W. M., "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not), No. w7552", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~ (2000)
  23. The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance, "Czarnitzki, D.", ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research, ~ (2004)
  24. Eberhart, A. C., "An Examination of Long‐Term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance Following R&D Increases", The Journal of Finance, 59(2), pp.623~650 (2004)
  25. Feldman, M., "The Ex Ante Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers: Government R&D Policy, Economic Incentives and Private Firm Behavior", Research Policy, 35(10), pp.1509~1521 (2006)
  26. Freel, M. S., "Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity", Research Policy, 32(5), pp.751~770 (2003)
  27. Gallie, E. P., "French Firms’ Strategies for Protecting Their Intellectual Property", Research Policy, 41(4), pp.780~794 (2012)
  28. Gans, J. S., "The Product Market and the Market for ‘'Ideas’': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs", Research Policy, 32, pp.333~350 (2003)
  29. Gassmann, O., "The Future of Open Innovation", R&D Management, 40, pp.213~221 (2010)
  30. Guo, D., "Government-subsidized R&D and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China", Research Policy, 45(6), pp.1129~1144 (2016)
  31. Hagedoorn, J., "The Role of Contracts and Intellectual Property Rights in Open Innovation", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9), pp.1050~1067 (2015)
  32. Hayes, A. F., "Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach" (2013), Guilford Press
  33. Hayes, A. F., "An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), pp.1~22 (2015)
  34. Henk, D., "Towards a Policy Framework for the Use of Knowledge in Innovation System", Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, pp.211~221 (1994)
  35. Henttonen, K., "Managing the Appropriability of R&D Collaboration", R&D Management, 46(S1), pp.145~158 (2016)
  36. Laursen, K., "Keep Searching and You’ll Find: What Do We Know about Variety Creation through Firms’ Search Activities for Innovation?", Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, pp.1181~1220 (2012)
  37. Laursen, K., "Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovative Performance among UK Manufacturing Firms", Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp.131~150 (2006)
  38. Lawson, B., "Appropriating the Value from Innovation: Inimitability and the Effectiveness of Isolating Mechanisms", R&D Management, 42, pp.420~434 (2012)
  39. Lee, C. Y., "Firm Density and Industry R&D Intensity: Theory and Evidence", Review of Industrial Organization, 22(2), pp.139~158 (2003)
  40. Leiponen, A., "If You Cannot Block, You Better Run: Small Firms, Cooperative Innovation, and Appropriation Strategies", Research Policy, 38(9), pp.1478~1488 (2009)
  41. Lemola, T., "Convergence of National Science and Technology Policies: The Case of Finland", Research Policy, 31, pp.1481~1490 (2002)
  42. Levin, R. C., "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 18, pp.783~831 (1987)
  43. Lichtenthaler, U., "Alliance Functions: Implications of the International Multi-R&D-alliance Perspective", Technovation, 24(7), pp.541~552 (2004)
  44. Lin, F. J., "The Determinants of Successful R&D Consortia: Government Strategy for the Servitization of Manufacturing", Service Business, 6(4), pp.489~502 (2012)
  45. Lundvall, B. A., "National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning" (1992), Pinter Publishers
  46. March, J. G., "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
  47. Martin, S., "The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation", Research Policy, 29(4), pp.437~447 (2000)
  48. Miozzo, M., "Innovation Collaboration and Appropriability by Knowledge-intensive Business Services Firms", Research Policy, 45(7), pp.1337~1351 (2016)
  49. Mowery, D. C., "Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer", Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp.77~91 (1996)
  50. Nelson, R. R., "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change" (1982), Harvard University Press
  51. OECD, "Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data", Organisation for Economic Cooporation and Development, ~ (2005)
  52. Okamuro, H., "Determinants of R&D Cooperation in Japanese Start-ups", Research Policy, 40, pp.728~738 (2011)
  53. Pavitt, K., "Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory", Research Policy, 13(6), pp.343~373 (1984)
  54. Pisano, G., "Profiting from Innovation and the Intellectual Property Revolution", Research Policy, 35, pp.1122~1130 (2006)
  55. Ritala, P., "Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition - The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, pp.154~169 (2013)
  56. Romer, P. M., "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth", The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), pp.1002~1037 (1986)
  57. Rosenzweig, E., "The Influence of an Integration Strategy on Competitive Capabilities and Business Performance: An Exploratory Study of Consumer Products Manufacturers", Journal of Operations Management, 21, pp.437~456 (2003)
  58. Sampson, R. C., "R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation", Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp.364~386 (2007)
  59. Sawers, J. L., "Safeguarding SMEs Dynamic Capabilities in Technology Innovative SME-large Company Partnerships in South Africa", Technovation, 28(4), pp.171~182 (2008)
  60. Shu, C., "Firm Patenting, Innovations, and Government Institutional Support as a Double‐Edged Sword", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(2), pp.290~305 (2015)
  61. Sobel, M. E., "Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models", Sociological Methodology, 13, pp.290~312 (1982)
  62. Teece, D. J., "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy", Research Policy, 15(6), pp.285~305 (1986)
  63. Teece, D. J., "Managing Intellectual Capital" (2002), Oxford University Press
  64. Tether, B. S., "Who Co-operates for Innovation, and Why: An Empirical Analysis", Research Policy, 31(6), pp.947~967 (2002)
  65. Tidd, J., "Managing Innovation" (2013), Wiley
  66. Tubbs, M., "The Relationship between R&D and Company Performance", Technology Management, 50(6), pp.23~30 (2007)
  67. Turban, D. B., "Firm Reputation and Applicant Pool Characteristics", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), pp.733~751 (2003)
  68. Vickery, S., "The Effects of an Integrative Supply Chain Strategy on Customer Service and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Direct versus Indirect Relationships", Journal of Operations Management, 21, pp.523~539 (2003)
  69. von Hippel, E., "The Sources of Innovation" (1988), Oxford University Press
  70. von Hippel, E., "Free Revealing and the Private-collective Model for Innovation Incentives", R&D Management, 36(3), pp.295~306 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)