하이데거와 신회에 있어서 마음의 구조적 유사성 − 『존재와 시간』과 『신회어록』을 중심으로 −

Abstract

Heidegger’s analysis of ‘Dasein’ is similar to Shenhui’s theory of Buddha-nature in many respects. Especially, Shenhui's understanding of ‘wisdom’ (知) in close connection with the theory of Buddha-nature is similar to the concept of Heidegger’s ‘Geworfene Möglichkeit’ in his Being and Time (Sein und Zeit), in the respect that both Heidegger’s and Shenhui’s investigations have common directivity into the original nature away from the non-original. In this thesis, the writer tries to show the similarities and the differences between the two on the bases of Heidegger’s analysis of ‘Dasein’ and Shenhui’s theory of Buddha-nature. The writer’s main texts of reference include Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit and Shenhui's ‘Questions and Answers of the Monk of Nanyang’ (南陽和尙 問答雜徵義), ‘Platform Talk of the Monk of Nanyang on the Direct Understanding of the Original Nature in the Chan/Zen’ (南陽和尙頓敎 解脫禪門直了性壇語), and ‘A Definition of Right and Wrong by the Southern School of Bodhidhama’ (菩提達磨南宗正是非論). The analysis of ‘Dasein’ (Dasein-analytik) takes the central place in Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit, and Shenhui’s theory of Buddha-nature permeates all through ‘The Analects of Shenhui’ (Shenhui Yulu), In this thesis, the writer intends to seek a way, or the possibility, to promote an active interchange of understandings between the two thoughts through the complementation of shortcomings covered in differences.