근로기준법상 직장 내 따돌림의 개념과 예방 교육의 실효적 의미
Concept of Workplace Ostrscism under the Labor Standards Act and Effective Meaning of Preventive Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The revision of the Labor Standards Act in 2019 legalized behavioral requirements and measures to ban workplace bullying, however in particular, the law has not effectively alleviated the phenomenon of workplace ostracism. Furthermore, academia and the media tend not to observe disharmony among members separately instead of focusing on abuse or unfair instructions by managers, called Gapjil. This paper reviews the concept of ostracism included in workplace bullying under the revised Labor Standards Act in 2019 and contributes to the preparation of measures applicable to actual workplaces by analyzing characteristics distinct from general abuse. To this end, I first consider domestic and international studies on the causes and attributes of workplace ostracism, introduce the research content discussed before the revised Labor Standards Act in 2019, and explain the nature of bullying in the workplace in light of the relevant regulations. As an alternative, this research considers the physical and mental integrity of workers as protective legal interests and emphasizes preventive education that alleviates the discriminatory factors prevalent in the workplace rather than post-processing that incompletely restores the damaged state.
Abstract
The revision of the Labor Standards Act in 2019 legalized behavioral requirements and measures to ban workplace bullying, however in particular, the law has not effectively alleviated the phenomenon of workplace ostracism. Furthermore, academia and the media tend not to observe disharmony among members separately instead of focusing on abuse or unfair instructions by managers, called Gapjil. This paper reviews the concept of ostracism included in workplace bullying under the revised Labor Standards Act in 2019 and contributes to the preparation of measures applicable to actual workplaces by analyzing characteristics distinct from general abuse. To this end, I first consider domestic and international studies on the causes and attributes of workplace ostracism, introduce the research content discussed before the revised Labor Standards Act in 2019, and explain the nature of bullying in the workplace in light of the relevant regulations. As an alternative, this research considers the physical and mental integrity of workers as protective legal interests and emphasizes preventive education that alleviates the discriminatory factors prevalent in the workplace rather than post-processing that incompletely restores the damaged state.
참고문헌 (27)
- "190712_직장 내 괴롭힘 교육자료(게시)" (2019)[URL]
- "'직장 내 괴롭힘' 신고 하루 평균 19건…실제 처벌 '미미'" (2023)[URL]
- "공공부문 직장 내 괴롭힘 신고는 10명 중 4명뿐" (2022)[URL]
- 신권철, "직장 내 괴롭힘의 법적 개념과 요건", 노동법학, (69), pp.217~251 (2019), 한국노동법학회
- "노동절 맞았지만, 직장인 ‘3대 갑질 중 1위는 괴롭힘’" (2023)[URL]
- 오세연, "직장 내 집단 따돌림이 민간경비원의 직무태도에 미치는 영향 -자아존중감의 조절효과를 중심으로-", 한국민간경비학회보, 13(3), pp.273~294 (2014), 한국민간경비학회
- 오세연, "직장 내 집단따돌림과 직무태도간의 관계에 대한 경찰관의 자기존중감 조절효과에 관한 연구", 한국경찰연구, 14(4), pp.243~268 (2015), 한국경찰연구학회
- 유계숙, "직장 내 집단따돌림에 영향을 미치는 조직문화와 반 따돌림 대처의 효과: 의료･교육･금융서비스업 종사자를 중심으로", 보건사회연구, 35(4), pp.245~277 (2015), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- 윤명숙, "직장 내 집단따돌림이 자살생각에 미치는 영향: 우울, 직무만족의 조절효과 중심으로", 정신건강과 사회복지, 41(3), pp.34~62 (2013), 한국정신건강사회복지학회
- 이윤상, "직장 내 따돌림이 조직몰입과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.2019
- 정다혜, "한국사회에서 직장 괴롭힘의 법적 개념 구성과 분쟁해결절차에 대한 고찰", 아세아여성법학, 21, pp.13~46 (2018)
- 정양운, "The Role of Interpersonal Conflict and Perceived Organizational Support in the Relationship between Workplace Ostracism and Performance", 지역산업연구, 38(3), pp.323~347 (2015), 산업경영연구소
- 최영근, "직장 내 집단 따돌림이 종업원의 SNS 중독에 미치는 영향: 조직지원인식의 조절효과 탐색", 역량개발학습연구(구 한국HRD연구), 11(3), pp.55~75 (2016), Human Engagement Institute[DOI]
- Barki, Henri, "Conceptualizing the Construct of Interpersonal Conflict", International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), pp.216~244 (2004)
- Ferris, D. L., "The Development and Validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale", Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), pp.1348~1366 (2008)
- Hakanen, Jari J., "The Job Demands-resources Model : A Three-year Cross-lagged Study of Burnout, Depression, Commitment, and Work Engagement", Work &Stress, 22(3), pp.224~241 (2008)
- Hobfoll, Stevan E., "Conservation of Resources : A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress", American Psychologist, 44(3), pp.513~524 (1989)
- Hobfoll, Stevan E., "Stress, Culture, and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress" (1998), Plenum Press
- Jehn, Karen A., "The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance", Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), pp.238~251 (2001)
- Leymann, Heinz, "The Content and Development of Mobbing at Work", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), pp.165~184 (1996)
- Leung, A. S. M., "The Impact of Workplace Ostracism in Service Organizations", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), pp.836~844 (2011)
- Pelled, Lisa Hope, "Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes : An Intervening Process Theory", Organizational Science, 7(6), pp.615~631 (1996)
- Rayner, Charlotte, "A Summary Review of Literature Relating to Workplace Bullying", Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, pp.181~191 (1997)
- Robinson, S. L., "Invisible at Work : An Integrated Model of Workplace Ostracism", Journal of Management, 39(1), pp.203~231 (2013)
- Wall Jr, James A., "Conflict and Its Management", Journal of Management, 21(3), pp.515~558 (1995)
- Wright, Thomas A., "Commitment, Psychological Well-being and Job Performance: An Examination of Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory and Job Burnout", Journal of Business & Management, 9(4), pp.389~406 (2004)
- Zapf, Dieter, "Organizational Work Group Related Personal Causes of Mobbing", Bullying at Work, 1999, pp.20(1, 2)[DOI]