Comparison of mechanical and biological properties of zirconia and titanium alloy orthodontic micro-implants
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the initial stability as insertion and removal torque and the clinical applicability of novel orthodontic zirconia micro-implants made using a powder injection molding (PIM) technique with those parameters in conventional titanium micro-implants. Methods: Sixty zirconia and 60 titanium micro-implants of similar design (diameter, 1.6 mm; length, 8.0 mm) were inserted perpendicularly in solid polyurethane foam with varying densities of 20 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), 30 pcf, and 40 pcf. Primary stability was measured as maximum insertion torque (MIT) and maximum removal torque (MRT). To investigate clinical applicability, compressive and tensile forces were recorded at 0.01, 0.02, and 0.03 mm displacement of the implants at angles of 0o, 10o, 20o, 30o, and 40o. The biocompatibility of zirconia micro-implants was assessed via an experimental animal study. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between zirconia micro-implants and titanium alloy implants with regard to MIT, MRT, or the amount of movement in the angulated lateral displacement test. As angulation increased, the mean compressive and tensile forces required to displace both types of micro-implants increased substantially at all distances. The average bone-to-implant contact ratio of prototype zirconia microimplants was 56.88 ± 6.72%. Conclusions: Zirconia micro-implants showed initial stability and clinical applicability for diverse orthodontic treatments comparable to that of titanium micro-implants under compressive and tensile forces. [Korean J Orthod 2017;47(4):229-237]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the initial stability as insertion and removal torque and the clinical applicability of novel orthodontic zirconia micro-implants made using a powder injection molding (PIM) technique with those parameters in conventional titanium micro-implants. Methods: Sixty zirconia and 60 titanium micro-implants of similar design (diameter, 1.6 mm; length, 8.0 mm) were inserted perpendicularly in solid polyurethane foam with varying densities of 20 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), 30 pcf, and 40 pcf. Primary stability was measured as maximum insertion torque (MIT) and maximum removal torque (MRT). To investigate clinical applicability, compressive and tensile forces were recorded at 0.01, 0.02, and 0.03 mm displacement of the implants at angles of 0o, 10o, 20o, 30o, and 40o. The biocompatibility of zirconia micro-implants was assessed via an experimental animal study. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between zirconia micro-implants and titanium alloy implants with regard to MIT, MRT, or the amount of movement in the angulated lateral displacement test. As angulation increased, the mean compressive and tensile forces required to displace both types of micro-implants increased substantially at all distances. The average bone-to-implant contact ratio of prototype zirconia microimplants was 56.88 ± 6.72%. Conclusions: Zirconia micro-implants showed initial stability and clinical applicability for diverse orthodontic treatments comparable to that of titanium micro-implants under compressive and tensile forces. [Korean J Orthod 2017;47(4):229-237]
참고문헌 (30)
- Kanomi R, "Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage", J Clin Orthod, 31, pp.763~767 (1997)
- Reynders R, "Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.564.e1~564.e19 (2009)
- Lee SJ, "Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants", AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 137, pp.194~199 (2010)
- Vande Vannet B, "Osseointegration of miniscrews: a histomorphometric evaluation", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.437~442 (2007)
- Hisbergues M, "Zirconia:Established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 88, pp.519~529 (2009)
- Nascimento Cd, "Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.337~343 (2014)
- Gahlert M, "Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.1247~1253 (2009)
- Park YS, "Peri-implant bone formation and surface characteristics of rough surface zirconia implants manufactured by powder injection molding technique in rabbit tibiae", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.586~591 (2013)
- Song HN, "Mechanical stability and clinical applicability assessment of novel orthodontic miniimplant design", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.832~841 (2013)
- Tsaousidis G, "Influence of insertion site on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews", J Orofac Orthop, 69, pp.349~356 (2008)
- Mouhyi J, "The peri-implantitis: implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspects", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.170~183 (2012)
- Yokoyama K, "Fracture mechanisms of retrieved titanium screw thread in dental implant", Biomaterials, 23, pp.2459~2465 (2002)
- Sicilia A, "Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.823~835 (2008)
- Özkurt Z, "Zirconia dental implants: a literature review", J Oral Implantol, 37, pp.367~376 (2011)
- Butz F, "Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation", J Oral Rehabil, 32, pp.838~843 (2005)
- Scarano A, "Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study", J Periodontol, 75, pp.292~296 (2004)
- Teughels W, "Effect of material characteristics and", or surface topography on biofilm development, 2006, pp.17(Suppl 2), 68~81
- Ikeda H, "Three-dimensional analysis of peribone-implant contact of rough-surface miniscrew implants", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.e153~e163 (2011)
- Aboushelib MN, "Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique", J Oral Implantol, 39, pp.583~590 (2013)
- Zinelis S, "Surface characterization of zirconia dental implants", Dent Mater, 26, pp.295~305 (2010)
- Wilmes B, "Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants", J Orofac Orthop, 67, pp.162~174 (2006)
- Kim YK, "Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.908~914 (2009)
- Hong C, "Stability comparison between commercially available mini-implants and a novel design: part 1", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.692~699 (2011)
- Meursinge Reynders RA, "Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.596.e5~614.e5 (2012)
- Motoyoshi M, "Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.109~114 (2006)
- Lee NK, "Effects of the diameter and shape of orthodontic mini-implants on microdamage to the cortical bone", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.8.e1~8.e8 (2010)
- Kim JW, "Histomorphometric and mechanical analyses of the drill-free screw as orthodontic anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.190~194 (2005)
- Holst AI, "Quantitative assessment of orthodontic miniimplant displacement: the effect of initial force application", Quintessence Int, 41, pp.59~66 (2010)
- Pickard MB, "Effects of miniscrew orientation on implant stability and resistance to failure", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.91~99 (2010)
- Kim TW, "Effects of microgrooves on the success rate and soft tissue adaptation of orthodontic miniscrews", Angle Orthod, 78, pp.1057~1064 (2008)