본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Self drilling과 Self-tapping microscrew implants의 조직학적 및 생역학적인 비교

Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants

정성화|박효상|Shue Yen
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)|2006.08|대한치과교정학회지 (The Korean Journal of Orthodontics)|제36권 제4호|pp. 295-307

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Removal torqueBone-implant contactMicroscrew implantPilot drill
주제분류치의학

초록

The purpose of this study was to compare the histological and biomechanical characteristicsof self-tapping and self-drilling microscrew implants. Methods: 112 microscrew implants (56 self-drillingand 56 self-tapping) were placed into the tibia of 28 rabbits. The implants were loaded immediately withno force, light (100 gm), or heavy force (200 gm) with nickel-titanium coil springs. The animals weresacrificed at 3- and 5-weeks after placement and histologic and histomorphometric analysis wereperformed under a microscope. Results: All microscrew implants stayed firm throughout theexperiment. There was no significant difference between self-drilling and self-tapping microscrewimplants both in peak insertion and removal torques. Histologic examinations showed there were moredefects in the self-tapping than the self-drilling microscrew implants, and newly formed immature bonewas increased at the interface in the self-tapping 5-week group. There was proliferation of bone towardsthe outer surface of the implant and/or toward the marrow space in the self-drilling group. Histologically,self-drilling microscrew implants provided more bone contact initially but the two methods becamesimilar at 5 weeks. Conclusion: These results indicate the two methods can be used for microscrewimplant placement, but when using self-tapping microscrew implants,

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the histological and biomechanical characteristicsof self-tapping and self-drilling microscrew implants. Methods: 112 microscrew implants (56 self-drillingand 56 self-tapping) were placed into the tibia of 28 rabbits. The implants were loaded immediately withno force, light (100 gm), or heavy force (200 gm) with nickel-titanium coil springs. The animals weresacrificed at 3- and 5-weeks after placement and histologic and histomorphometric analysis wereperformed under a microscope. Results: All microscrew implants stayed firm throughout theexperiment. There was no significant difference between self-drilling and self-tapping microscrewimplants both in peak insertion and removal torques. Histologic examinations showed there were moredefects in the self-tapping than the self-drilling microscrew implants, and newly formed immature bonewas increased at the interface in the self-tapping 5-week group. There was proliferation of bone towardsthe outer surface of the implant and/or toward the marrow space in the self-drilling group. Histologically,self-drilling microscrew implants provided more bone contact initially but the two methods becamesimilar at 5 weeks. Conclusion: These results indicate the two methods can be used for microscrewimplant placement, but when using self-tapping microscrew implants,

참고문헌 (33)

  1. "Uses of implants in orthodontics", 32, pp.539~550 (1988)
  2. "Rigid implant anchorage to close a mandibular first molar extraction site", 28, pp.693~704 (1994)
  3. "The possibility of skeletal anchorage", 17, pp.266~269 (1983)
  4. "Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage", 31, pp.763~767 (1997)
  5. "The skeletal cortical anchorage using titanium microscrew implants", 29, pp.699~706 (1999)
  6. "The use of Micro-implant as orthodontic anchorage", pp.5~124 (2001), Nare Publication
  7. "Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of Skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion", 35, pp.417~422 (2001)
  8. "Nonextraction treatment with Microscrew implant", 74, pp.539~549 (2004)
  9. "The efficient use of midpalatal miniscrew implants", 74, pp.711~714 (2004)
  10. "C-orthodontic microimplant for distalization of mandibular dentition in Class III correction", 75, pp.119~128 (2005)
  11. "AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: an ultrastructural study of the implant interface", 60, pp.294~299 (2002)
  12. "Drill free screws: a new form of osteosynthesis screw", 26, pp.163~168 (1998)
  13. "Clinical applications of drill free screws in maxillofacial surgery", 27, pp.252~255 (1999)
  14. "Analysis of the osseous", metal interface of drill free screws and self tapping screws, 2001, pp.29, 69~74
  15. "The effects of operator technique and bur design on temperature during osseous preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws", 88, pp.145~150 (1999)
  16. "Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants", 15, pp.474~480 (2004)
  17. "A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone", 7, pp.62~71 (1992)
  18. "Comparison of compression and torque measurements of self-tapping and pre-tapped screws", 83, pp.447~458 (1989)
  19. "Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans", 22, pp.31~43 (2002)
  20. "Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants", 86, pp.95~111 (1984)
  21. "Mathematical elements of bone remodeling" (1964), CC Thomas
  22. "Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws", 28, pp.9~13 (2003)
  23. "Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits", 7, pp.120~127 (1996)
  24. "Osteoclastic bone resorption around intraosseous screws in rat and pig mandibles", 61, pp.533~539 (2003)
  25. "Factors affecting the clinical success of mini- or microscrew implants used as orthodontic anchorage", 130, pp.18~25 (2006)
  26. "Effects of drilling process in stability of micro-implants used for the orthodontic anchorage", 32, pp.107~115 (2002)
  27. "Comparative in vitro studies of self-boring and self-tapping screws. Histomorphological and physical-technical studies of bone layers", 4, pp.159~163 (2000)
  28. "Thermal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat effects", 11, pp.115~121 (1982)
  29. "Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique", 44, pp.4~7 (1986)
  30. "The effects of irrigation on osteotomy depth and bur diameter", 11, pp.634~638 (1996)
  31. "The effects of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites", 11, pp.35~37 (1996)
  32. "Effects of hole preparation on screw pullout resistance and insertional torque: a biomechanical study", 94, pp.91~96 (2001)
  33. "A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians", 74, pp.3~15 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of rotation bump on removal torque of orthodontic mini-implants김영균, 김종완, 김태우, 이종호, 정종화, Odontuya Gansukh대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2013 · 제36권 제6호The comparison of torque values in two types of miniscrews placed in rabbits: tapered and cylindrical shapes - Preliminary study김경호, 유현미, 정주령, Dong-Sung Park, In-Sung Jang, Seung-Hyun Kyung대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2011 · 제41권 제4호Bone cutting capacity and osseointegration of surface-treated orthodontic mini-implantsHo-Young Kim, Sang-Cheol Kim대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2016 · 제46권 제6호Effect of surface anodization on stability of orthodontic microimplant경희문, 유원재, Sanket Karmarker대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2012 · 제42권 제1호교정용 미니 임플랜트의 cutting flute의 길이 및 형태에 따른 식립 및 제거 토크의 비교윤순동, 임성훈대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2009 · 제39권 제2호교정력의 즉시 부하가 미니스크류의 제거 회전력에 미치는 영향의 평가강윤구, 국윤아, 김성훈, 모성서, 선승범대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2007 · 제37권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

간헐적 교정력 적용 후 백서 치주인대에서UNC-50 유전자의 발현박주철, 박미경, 임성훈, 김광원pp. 242-25016S rDNA 클론 library 제작 및 핵산염기서열 결정을 통한 교정용 미니임플랜트 주위 열구의 세균 동정장영일, 유소영, 임성훈, 김광원, 국중기pp. 251-262교정용 밴드 제거 후 미생물 분포 및 치주 조직의 임상적 변화양유미, 박수병, 전은숙, 김성식pp. 263-274교정용 미니임플랜트의 이중 피치와 직경의 차이가 삽입 및 제거 토크에 미치는 영향 평가조일식, 이신재, 장영일, 김태우, 김종완pp. 275-283어퍼트 및 크루즌 증후군을 유발하는 골조직 특이성 FGFR2 돌연변이에 의한 두개안면 형태의 변화윤태민, 박영철, 백형선, 송진욱, 이기준, 나현덕, 스티븐소아pp. 284-294
원문 보기