본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정부지역혁신사업 관리의 효율성에 대한 탐색적 분석과 시사점: 종합적 수준에서의 접근

An Exploratory Analysis of the Efficiency of Government's Regional Innovation Programs from the Comprehensive Management Perspective and Its Implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기술정책

초록

The Korean Government has recently been pushing ahead with a variety of programs to support regional innovation. This paper examines whether the variety of regional innovation programs of the government are efficiently managed and effectively functioning in regions. To make the assessment, questionnaire surveys were executed targeting innovation actors in fourteen regions and evaluated the efficiency of government regional programs. Key points of assessment were the appropriateness of the program organization and the efficiency of program management for the effectiveness of program results. It was found that the appropriateness of the program organization and the efficiency of program management were related positively to performance of programs, but the performance of regional innovation programs overall was not high. Some problems were found in program organization and program management such as the overlapping of program objectives and functions, the inadequate synergy among programs, insufficient reflection of the needs of industry in planning, the overlapping investment in facilities and equipment, and low effectiveness of evaluation.

Abstract

The Korean Government has recently been pushing ahead with a variety of programs to support regional innovation. This paper examines whether the variety of regional innovation programs of the government are efficiently managed and effectively functioning in regions. To make the assessment, questionnaire surveys were executed targeting innovation actors in fourteen regions and evaluated the efficiency of government regional programs. Key points of assessment were the appropriateness of the program organization and the efficiency of program management for the effectiveness of program results. It was found that the appropriateness of the program organization and the efficiency of program management were related positively to performance of programs, but the performance of regional innovation programs overall was not high. Some problems were found in program organization and program management such as the overlapping of program objectives and functions, the inadequate synergy among programs, insufficient reflection of the needs of industry in planning, the overlapping investment in facilities and equipment, and low effectiveness of evaluation.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 감사원, "지역산업진흥사업 추진실태 감사결과" (2005), 감사원
  2. "2005년도 국가균형발전사업에 대한 전년도 추진실적 평가보고서" (2005), 국가균형발전사업평가위원회
  3. 기획예산처, "국가균형발전특별회계 운용 방안" (2004), 기획예산처
  4. "2005년도 국가균형발전특별회계 운용 개요" (2005), 기획예산처
  5. 송위진, "한국 국가혁신체제 발전방안 연구" (2004), 과학기술정책연구원
  6. "지역전략산업 진흥사업 심층평가" (2006), 「지역전략산업 어떻게 추진할 것인가」 공개토론회 자료
  7. Andersson, T., "Managing a Systems approach to Technology and Innovation Policy", 22, pp.9~29 (1998)
  8. Carlsson, B, "In Search of Useful Public Policies: Key Lessons and Issues for Policy Makers" (1997), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers
  9. "Evaluation of Research, Technological Development and Innovation related Actions under Structural funds(Objective 2)" (1999), Final Synthesis Report
  10. Hauknes, J, "Economic rationales of government involvement in innovation and the supply of innovation-related services" (1999), STEP report, R-08, STEP Group
  11. "Systems approaches to innovation : Some policy issues, ISE report project, Systems of Innovation Research program" (1998), Department of Technology and Social Change
  12. Lundvall, "National System of Innovation Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning" (1992)
  13. "Public policy and industrial dynamics : An evolutionary perspective, Systems of Innovation Research program" (1998), Department of Technology and Social Change
  14. Metcalfe, J. S, "Equilibrium and Evolutionary Foundations of Technology Policy", 22, pp.75~100 (1998)
  15. "Towards a new Paradigm for Innovation Policy?" (1999), SMEPOL final report, Maastricht
  16. OECD, "Technology, Productivity and Job Creation- Best Policy Practice" (1998), OECD Paris
  17. Step, "SMEPOL (SME Policy and the regional dimension of innovation) Final Report" (2000), STEP Group
  18. "SMEPOL (SME Policy and the regional dimension of innovation) Final Report" (2000), STEP Group

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)