본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『쓰레즈레구사(徒然草)』한국어번역텍스트에 대한 고찰

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This study is to examine the statues and the features of the translations of Tsurezuregusa in Korean. So far, there have been four different versions of its translation in Korean. First, the book was translated by Song, Sook-kyong and published in 1976. This version is somewhat plain in general, with some mistranslations and omissions present. Some critical mistakes include translating proper nouns to common nouns. Another version was translated by Chai,Hae-sook and published in 2001. This version introduced subtitles for each chapter so that readers could easily understand the contents. The annotations in this version are much more detailed in comparison to other versions. However, there are still some mistranslations, omissions, and even a lack of unity of translation because of the mixed use of Japanese phonetic notations and Korean phonetic notations for proper nouns. A third translation of the book was done by Jeong Jang -sik and published in 2004. This translation also shows mistakes similar to the ones found in Song, Sook-kyong’s. Translations of proper nouns to common nouns are problematic in both cases. The last translation to consider was done by Kim,Chung-young and Um,In-kyoung is considered as the most authentic translation among the four books, although some mistranslation is still found. Our research concerning the translation of Japanese classical literature to Korean concluded that the field is in its infancy with a lot of challenges to overcome. I look forward to future full-fledged research projects on the translation of Japanese classical literature to Korean.

Abstract

This study is to examine the statues and the features of the translations of Tsurezuregusa in Korean. So far, there have been four different versions of its translation in Korean. First, the book was translated by Song, Sook-kyong and published in 1976. This version is somewhat plain in general, with some mistranslations and omissions present. Some critical mistakes include translating proper nouns to common nouns. Another version was translated by Chai,Hae-sook and published in 2001. This version introduced subtitles for each chapter so that readers could easily understand the contents. The annotations in this version are much more detailed in comparison to other versions. However, there are still some mistranslations, omissions, and even a lack of unity of translation because of the mixed use of Japanese phonetic notations and Korean phonetic notations for proper nouns. A third translation of the book was done by Jeong Jang -sik and published in 2004. This translation also shows mistakes similar to the ones found in Song, Sook-kyong’s. Translations of proper nouns to common nouns are problematic in both cases. The last translation to consider was done by Kim,Chung-young and Um,In-kyoung is considered as the most authentic translation among the four books, although some mistranslation is still found. Our research concerning the translation of Japanese classical literature to Korean concluded that the field is in its infancy with a lot of challenges to overcome. I look forward to future full-fledged research projects on the translation of Japanese classical literature to Korean.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. 김종덕, "한국에서의 『겐지 이야기』 번역에 관한 연구", 통번역학연구, 12(2), pp.103~123 (2009), 통번역연구소
  2. 김충영, "일본명작총서9 쓰레즈레구사 徒然草", pp.3~276 (2010), 도서출판
  3. 송숙경, "을유문고182 도연초", pp.7~191 (1975), 을유문화사
  4. 윤상인, "일본문학번역60년 현황과 분석", pp.7~151 (2008), 소명출판
  5. 정장식, "요시다 겐코·가모노 조메이 수필선 도연초·호조키", pp.11~284 (2004), 을유문화사
  6. 채혜숙, "도연초 徒然草붓 가는 대로, 마음 내키는 대로…", pp.5~319 (2001), 바다출판사
  7. 최관, "한국에서 일본고전문학연구 동향 ‐2005년~2011년을 중심으로‐", 일어일문학연구, 83(2), pp.61~81 (2012), 한국일어일문학회
  8. 한정미, "『겐지 모노가타리(源氏物語)』의 한국어역-김난주(金蘭周)의 『겐지 이야기』를 중심으로-", 일어일문학연구, 76(2), pp.173~196 (2011), 한국일어일문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)