본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문학 교육과 디아스포라 ― 재일한국인 이양지의 소설을 중심으로

Literary Education and Diaspora - Focused upon the short stories of Lee, Yangji, a Korean in Japan

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper, to look into literary educational implication of the works of Koreans living in Japan, scrutinizes the process in which the main characters of the second generations of Korean residents in Japan formed their own identities wandering their motherland and present residences with the viewpoint of diaspora. In the 2nd chapter, the reason why the 2nd generations who came back to study abroad in Korea considered their motherland as utopia or dystopia was examined, and it turned out to be blood and languages as the marker of boundary division. In the 3rd chapter, the term 'we' which appeared in her short stories proved to be a strategic term that forms fresh 'I' by admitting the other 'you' in 'our' reflexively, which was found out as a result of triple-fold language through the dialogue between Korean and Japanese languages. In the chapter 4, that the learners of reading process who are living in the cosmopolitan era form themselves as new subjects while conversing with people with multiple personality and criticizing each other is verified. In this respect, the literary educational implication of her short stories is quite important. The assertion that learners should form their ethnic identities through Korean literary works was formed through a narrow-minded idea of the ethnocentrism. It is necessary that we should use the works of the 2nd generations living in Japan as the premise to understand the works of Koreans who live in foreign countries and use them as step-stones for the 21st century's open education.

Abstract

This paper, to look into literary educational implication of the works of Koreans living in Japan, scrutinizes the process in which the main characters of the second generations of Korean residents in Japan formed their own identities wandering their motherland and present residences with the viewpoint of diaspora. In the 2nd chapter, the reason why the 2nd generations who came back to study abroad in Korea considered their motherland as utopia or dystopia was examined, and it turned out to be blood and languages as the marker of boundary division. In the 3rd chapter, the term 'we' which appeared in her short stories proved to be a strategic term that forms fresh 'I' by admitting the other 'you' in 'our' reflexively, which was found out as a result of triple-fold language through the dialogue between Korean and Japanese languages. In the chapter 4, that the learners of reading process who are living in the cosmopolitan era form themselves as new subjects while conversing with people with multiple personality and criticizing each other is verified. In this respect, the literary educational implication of her short stories is quite important. The assertion that learners should form their ethnic identities through Korean literary works was formed through a narrow-minded idea of the ethnocentrism. It is necessary that we should use the works of the 2nd generations living in Japan as the premise to understand the works of Koreans who live in foreign countries and use them as step-stones for the 21st century's open education.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. "문학 교육 이념으로서의 주체 형성과 민족적 주체 문학 교육의 민족성과 세계성"
  2. "한국문학교육학회", pp.95~121 (2000), 태학사
  3. "이방인, 신, 괴물" (2004), 개마고원
  4. "소수자로서의 재일동포-민족교육을 중심으로 한국의 소수자 실태와 전망"
  5. "在日한국인 문학연구" (2002), 도서출판 월인
  6. "코리안 디아스포라" (2004), 고려대학교출판부
  7. "재일교포 문학의 작품 성향 연구-정치의식 변화를 중심으로", 중앙대학교
  8. "재일교포 문학의 작품 성향 연구-정치의식 변화를 중심으로", 중앙대학교

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)