본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가슴압박소생술과 표준심폐소생술의 가슴압박 품질, 심폐소생술 수행 의지 및 자신감 비교 분석

Comparison of Chest Compression Quality, Willingness and Confidence to Perform Witness Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation between the Compression Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and the Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

박주현|김수현|김미영|오정민|신인선|조은희|안신|송재관|오윤희
한국간호시뮬레이션학회 (Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing)|2020.12|한국간호시뮬레이션학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing)|제8권 제2호|pp. 1-13|DOI 10.17333/JKSSN.2020.8.2.1

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

EducationStandardsMethodsCardiopulmonary resuscitation

초록

Purpose: This study compares the chest compression quality, and the willingness and confidence to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before and after education between the compression only CPR (COCPR) group and the standard CPR (STCPR) group using manikins. Method: This study employs a randomized controlled trial design. A total of 219 and 214 individuals were randomly assigned to the COCPR and STCPR groups, respectively. Both groups were asked to perform CPR for 2 min before and after education. The willingness and confidence to perform CPR were surveyed through a questionnaire. Results: Before education, the STCPR group had a significantly higher mean chest compression depth and accuracy than the COCPR group for the entire 2 min. After education, the STCPR group had a significantly higher mean chest compression depth for 2 min and higher compression accuracy for late 1 min than the COCPR group. However, no significant difference in the willingness and confidence to perform CPR according to the compression method was evident. Conclusion: Repeated training is required to maintain chest compression quality. CPR education improves willingness and confidence to perform CPR.

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the chest compression quality, and the willingness and confidence to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before and after education between the compression only CPR (COCPR) group and the standard CPR (STCPR) group using manikins. Method: This study employs a randomized controlled trial design. A total of 219 and 214 individuals were randomly assigned to the COCPR and STCPR groups, respectively. Both groups were asked to perform CPR for 2 min before and after education. The willingness and confidence to perform CPR were surveyed through a questionnaire. Results: Before education, the STCPR group had a significantly higher mean chest compression depth and accuracy than the COCPR group for the entire 2 min. After education, the STCPR group had a significantly higher mean chest compression depth for 2 min and higher compression accuracy for late 1 min than the COCPR group. However, no significant difference in the willingness and confidence to perform CPR according to the compression method was evident. Conclusion: Repeated training is required to maintain chest compression quality. CPR education improves willingness and confidence to perform CPR.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Anderson, G. S., "First aid skill retention of first responders within the workplace", Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 19(1), pp.11~ (2011)
  2. Berg, R. A., "Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care", Circulation, 122(18), pp.S685~S705 (2010)[DOI]
  3. Bhanji, F., "Part 14: Education", Circulation, 132(18), pp.S561~S573 (2015)[DOI]
  4. Cho, G. C., "The effect of basic life support education on laypersons' willingness in performing bystander hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Resuscitation, 81(6), pp.691~694 (2010)[DOI]
  5. "Effect of first aid for cardiopulmonary arrest" (2016)[URL]
  6. Grimes, D. A., "Compared to what? Finding controls for case-control studies", Lancet, 365(9468), pp.1429~1433 (2005)[DOI]
  7. Hasselqvist-Ax, I., "Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in outof-hospital cardiac arrest", The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(24), pp.2307~2315 (2015)[DOI]
  8. Heidenreich, J. W., "Rescuer fatigue : Standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(10), pp.1020~1026 (2006)[DOI]
  9. Idris, A. H., "Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", Critical Care Medicine, 43(4), pp.840~848 (2015)[DOI]
  10. 전소연, "일반 성인들의 심폐소생술 자기효능감에 미치는 영향 요인", 농촌의학.지역보건, 44(3), pp.124~137 (2019), 한국농촌의학.지역보건학회
  11. 김유정, "대학생의 심폐소생술 수행자신감에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국학교보건학회지, 30(3), pp.194~201 (2017), 한국학교보건학회
  12. "Public CPR practice rate" (2020)[URL]
  13. Kuramoto, N., "Public perception of and willingness to perform bystander CPR in Japan", Resuscitation, 79(3), pp.475~481 (2008)[DOI]
  14. 이원웅, "일반인 심폐소생술 교육 후 목격자 심폐소생술에 대한 자신감 및 태도변화", 대한응급의학회지, 20(5), pp.505~509 (2009), 대한응급의학회
  15. Link, M. S., "Part 7: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care", Circulation, 132(18), pp.S444~S464 (2015)[DOI]
  16. McDonald, C. H., "Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)performance", Emergency Medicine Journal, 30(8), pp.623~627 (2013)[DOI]
  17. McNally, B., "Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance- Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005- December 31, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report", Surveillance Summaries, 60(8), pp.1~19 (2011)
  18. 민문기, "가슴압박만 하는 심폐소생술과 30:2 표준 심폐소생술 방법에 의한 가슴압박 질의 비교", 한국응급구조학회지, 19(3), pp.139~148 (2015), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회
  19. Nishiyama, C., "Effectiveness of simplified chest compressiononly CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video : A randomized controlled trial", Resuscitation, 80(10), pp.1164~1168 (2009)[DOI]
  20. Nolan, J. P, "Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Seminars in Neurology, 37(1), pp.5~12 (2017)[DOI]
  21. 박주영, "간호대학생의 심폐소생술 수행의지에 미치는 영향요인", 근관절건강학회지, 26(2), pp.131~140 (2019), 대한근관절건강학회[DOI]
  22. 박유진, "심폐소생술 시 구조자의 hand technique에 따른 가슴압박의 질 및 피로도 비교", 한국응급구조학회지, 23(3), pp.67~81 (2019), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회[DOI]
  23. Rossler, B., "Providing the best chest compression quality: Standard CPR versus chest compressions only in a bystander resuscitation model", PLOS One, 15(2), pp.e0228702~ (2020)[DOI]
  24. Rossler, B., "Can a flowchart improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Resuscitation, 84(7), pp.982~986 (2013)[DOI]
  25. Savastano, S., "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in real life : The most frequent fears of lay rescuers", Resuscitation, 82(5), pp.568~571 (2011)[DOI]
  26. Shin, J., "Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression- only CPR: A randomized crossover manikin trial", Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency, 22, pp.59~ (2014)[DOI]
  27. Stiell, I. G., "What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients", Circulation, 130(22), pp.1962~1970 (2014)[DOI]
  28. Zhou, X. L., "Quality retention of chest compression after repetitive practices with or without feedback devices : A randomized manikin study", The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(1), pp.73~78 (2020)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

가슴압박만 하는 심폐소생술과 30:2 표준 심폐소생술 방법에 의한 가슴압박 질의 비교류지호, 민문기사단법인 한국응급구조학회 · 한국응급구조학회지2015 · 제19권 제3호음성지시에 따른 전통적 심폐소생술과 가슴압박소생술시 흉부압박 정확도와 피로도 비교백미례, 윤병길사단법인 한국응급구조학회 · 한국응급구조학회지2012 · 제16권 제2호Effect of pre-educational evaluation on CPR education of the General population김경용, 양현모한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2021 · 제12권 제7호의료인들이 제공하는 가슴 압박의 질에 대한 가상 연구강지훈, 고재욱, 김경욱, 김인병, 여준모, 정상원, 좌민홍대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2011 · 제26권 제2호병원내 심폐소생술 모형에서 환자와 구조자의 거리 및 위치에 따른 가슴압박의 질 비교김건남, 류소연, 장진영, 최성우사단법인 한국응급구조학회 · 한국응급구조학회지2014 · 제18권 제1호일반인 심폐소생술 질의 정량적 분석박인성한국운동생리학회 · 운동과학2019 · 제28권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

간호대학생의 학습자기효능감, 학습만족도 및 전이동기 간의 관계: 통합시뮬레이션실습 교과목 중심으로고영주, 김남석pp. 15-25핵심기본간호술을 적용한 통합실습 운영 효과김현pp. 27-37간호대학생의 근거기반 시뮬레이션 실습 교육 경험박미라, 제남주, 여형남pp. 39-50문제중심학습 기반 임상간호 시뮬레이션 교육 프로그램의 효과이은경, 박지현, 이영주, 정선영, 김은희, 이해인, 이보경, 박진화pp. 51-63
원문 보기