본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

Factors Affecting KOREA ARMY Officers’ Achievement in Professional Development Education

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to identify the person and class level factors and class level factors significantly affect the students’ academic achievement in the military professional development education. Total 695 military officers were sampled and were administered a battery of questionnaires in April 2015. The sampled officers were in the officer advanced course of 9 army branch schools and they belonged to 33 classes. The data were analyzed in hierarchical linear modeling because the data structure was multilevel with personal and classroom level. The dependent variable was the officers’ grade level and a multinomial logit model was applied. The grade level was classified into three kinds (A, B, and C) and the student officers received Grade B served as reference group. The results suggested that the college graduation status was not significant because most of the military officers had bachelor degree so there was not much variance in the grade classification caused by the college graduation status. Second, learning motivation is the psychological energy that a learner starts and ends their studying behavior. In many studies, learning motivation was proven to be a strong indicator of a learner's academic achievement. Learning motivation was significant to separate Grade B from C, however, it was not significant to separate Grade A from B. There was big difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade B from Grade C, however, there was no significant difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade A and B. Meanwhile, learning strategy turned out to be significant both to separate Grade B from C, and Grade A from B. Many learners who make effort to store, retrieve, and apply to their learning assignment gain better grade than learners who do not know the way to apply the strategy. The results also indicate that the instructors must teach their student not only the class contents but also the learning strategy to improve their learning accomplishment. Study time is also significant to classify the Grade A from B, B from C in the personal and class-level and the result indicates that learning strategy itself is necessary but not enough to improve a learner's grade level. Logical teaching style positively separate the Grade B from C, A from B and the result means that logical instructors clearly point out a learner's strength and weakness. The honest feedback and direct guideline are effective to improve the military officers' accomplishment. The military schools must apply the results when they train their instructors. Learning motivation is the psychological energy that a learner starts and ends their studying behavior. In many studies, learning motivation was proven to be a strong indicator of a learner's academic achievement. Learning motivation was significant to separate Grade B from C, however, it was not significant to separate Grade A from B because there was big difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade B from Grade C, however, there was no significant difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade A from B. Meanwhile, learning strategy turned out to be significant both to separate Grade B from C and Grade A from B. Many learners who make effort to store, retrieve, and apply to their learning assignment gain better grade than learners who do not know the way to apply the strategy. The results also indicate that the instructors must teach their student not only the class contents but also the learning strategy to improve their learning accomplishment. Study time is significant to classify the Grade A from B, B from C in the personal and class-level and the result indicates that learning strategy itself is necessary but not enough to improve a learner's grade level.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the person and class level factors and class level factors significantly affect the students’ academic achievement in the military professional development education. Total 695 military officers were sampled and were administered a battery of questionnaires in April 2015. The sampled officers were in the officer advanced course of 9 army branch schools and they belonged to 33 classes. The data were analyzed in hierarchical linear modeling because the data structure was multilevel with personal and classroom level. The dependent variable was the officers’ grade level and a multinomial logit model was applied. The grade level was classified into three kinds (A, B, and C) and the student officers received Grade B served as reference group. The results suggested that the college graduation status was not significant because most of the military officers had bachelor degree so there was not much variance in the grade classification caused by the college graduation status. Second, learning motivation is the psychological energy that a learner starts and ends their studying behavior. In many studies, learning motivation was proven to be a strong indicator of a learner's academic achievement. Learning motivation was significant to separate Grade B from C, however, it was not significant to separate Grade A from B. There was big difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade B from Grade C, however, there was no significant difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade A and B. Meanwhile, learning strategy turned out to be significant both to separate Grade B from C, and Grade A from B. Many learners who make effort to store, retrieve, and apply to their learning assignment gain better grade than learners who do not know the way to apply the strategy. The results also indicate that the instructors must teach their student not only the class contents but also the learning strategy to improve their learning accomplishment. Study time is also significant to classify the Grade A from B, B from C in the personal and class-level and the result indicates that learning strategy itself is necessary but not enough to improve a learner's grade level. Logical teaching style positively separate the Grade B from C, A from B and the result means that logical instructors clearly point out a learner's strength and weakness. The honest feedback and direct guideline are effective to improve the military officers' accomplishment. The military schools must apply the results when they train their instructors. Learning motivation is the psychological energy that a learner starts and ends their studying behavior. In many studies, learning motivation was proven to be a strong indicator of a learner's academic achievement. Learning motivation was significant to separate Grade B from C, however, it was not significant to separate Grade A from B because there was big difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade B from Grade C, however, there was no significant difference in the variance in the learning motivation between learners of Grade A from B. Meanwhile, learning strategy turned out to be significant both to separate Grade B from C and Grade A from B. Many learners who make effort to store, retrieve, and apply to their learning assignment gain better grade than learners who do not know the way to apply the strategy. The results also indicate that the instructors must teach their student not only the class contents but also the learning strategy to improve their learning accomplishment. Study time is significant to classify the Grade A from B, B from C in the personal and class-level and the result indicates that learning strategy itself is necessary but not enough to improve a learner's grade level.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Harris KR, "Practice-based Professional Development and Self-regulated Development", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40(1), pp.5~16 (2015)
  2. Jung BS, "Explanatory Factors Affecting Korea Army Officers Academic Achievement in Their Professional Development Courses of Branch Schools", The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 32(4), pp.217~247 (2015)
  3. McCommick MP, "Teacher-child Relationship and Academic Achievement: A multilevel Propensity Score Model Approach", Journal of School Psychology, 51(5), pp.611~624 (2013)
  4. Forsyth J, "Teaching Strategies to Military p-Professionals", Conference Paper Submitted to Annual Meeting of International Studies (2010)
  5. Raudenbush SW, "Hierarchical Lin ear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods" (2002), Sage
  6. Choi HR, "A Study on the Protective and Hazard Factors for Soldiers Adaptation to Military Life", Korea Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10(3), pp.1743~1756 (2009)
  7. Choi DM, "Improvement Measure of Professional Vocation through Continuing Education", Journal of Vocational Education, 29(4), pp.1~20 (2010)
  8. Fellenz MR, "Forming the Professional Self: Building and the Ontological Perspective on Professional Education and Development", Educational Philosophy & Theory, 48(3), pp.267~283 (2016)
  9. Walkington J, "Becoming a Teacher: Encouraging Development of Professional Identity through Reflective Practice", Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), pp.53~64 (2005)
  10. Green B, "Understanding and Researching Professional Practice" (2009), Sense
  11. Rodgers CR, "Handbook of Research on Teacher Education" (2008), Routledge
  12. Renninger KA, "Interest and Identity Development in Instruction: An Inductive Model", Educational Psychologist, 44(2), pp.1~14 (2009)
  13. Billett S, "Realizing the Educational worth of Integrating Work Experiences in Higher Education", Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), pp.827~834 (2009)
  14. Yidirim S, "Teacher Support Motivation learning Strategy Use and Achievement: A Multilevel Mediation Model", Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), pp.150~172 (2012)
  15. Shaha SH, "Predictor of Success for Professional Development", Journal of Instructional Psychology, 40(1), pp.19~26 (2013)
  16. Factors affecting Korea Army Office Ers Academic Achievement in their Professional Development Education, "Jung BS", Research Report Submitted to Chungsungdae Research Institute, ~ (2015)
  17. Artino Jr AR, "Online Military Training: Using a Social Cognitive View of Motivation and Self-regulation to Understand Students Satisfaction Perceived Learning and Choice", Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), pp.191~202 (2007)
  18. Self-learning among Army Noncommissioned Officers: Experiences Attitudes and Preferred Strategies, "Graves TR", Army Research Institute, ~ (2012)
  19. Poole MS, "Decision Development in Computer-assisted Group Decision Making", Human Communication Research, 22(1), pp.90~127 (1995)
  20. Reddy YM, "A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), pp.435~448 (2010)
  21. Pintrich PR, "Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ)", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), pp.801~813 (1993)
  22. Jung BS, "Explanatory Factors for Korea Army Officers Satisfaction in their Professional Development Education", The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 31(4), pp.217~247 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)