본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

A Study on TAEKWONDO Curriculum in the United States

최성곤
동북아학술저널연합 (Northeast Asian Studies Journal Institute (J-INSTITUTE))|2021.12|International Journal of Martial Arts|제6권 제4호|pp. 23-32

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

CurriculumTaekwondoSubjectHistoryGrandmaster

초록

Purpose: This study sought to analyze the American Taekwondo curriculum and standardize the American Taekwondo curriculum to ensure that it can meet the Taekwondo educational goals pursued by Kukkiwon, the world Taekwondo headquarters. The standardized American Taekwondo curriculum will contribute to the educa-tional use of Taekwondo in the United States. Results: The world Taekwondo headquarters, Kukkiwon dispatches the Kukkiwon masters to 53 countries to teach and evaluate Taekwondo according to the standard curriculum. However, the US does not currently have a Kukkiwon master dispatched. Moving forward, the Kukkiwon masters should be dispatched to supply the stand-ard curriculum relative to the Taekwondo training population. The “Taekwondo Standard Curriculum” presented by Kukkiwon and the Korea Taekwondo Association in 2019 divided the subjects to be completed by the non-Poom-and-Dan-holders and Poom and Dan holders into the mandatory and optional courses. 1) Non-Poom-and-Dan-holders must complete the training period(40 hours x 9 levels = 360 hours) for 40 hours of unit time for each level from level 1 through level 9, respectively. 2) As for 1 Poom and Dan holders, the time of completion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 3 units = 240 hours), and as for 2 Poom and Dan holders, the time of comple-tion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 6 units = 480 hours), as for 3 Poom and Dan holders, the time of completion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 9 units = 720 hours), and as for 4 Poom and Dan holders, the time of completion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 12 units = 960 hours) are required, respectively. Conclusion: That is, for the Taekwondo curriculum, the trainees should not only comply with the period required after the promotion of Poom and Dan, but also should be required to complete the mandatory training time, thereby making it an even more effective approach toward achieving the educational goal of Taekwondo.

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to analyze the American Taekwondo curriculum and standardize the American Taekwondo curriculum to ensure that it can meet the Taekwondo educational goals pursued by Kukkiwon, the world Taekwondo headquarters. The standardized American Taekwondo curriculum will contribute to the educa-tional use of Taekwondo in the United States. Results: The world Taekwondo headquarters, Kukkiwon dispatches the Kukkiwon masters to 53 countries to teach and evaluate Taekwondo according to the standard curriculum. However, the US does not currently have a Kukkiwon master dispatched. Moving forward, the Kukkiwon masters should be dispatched to supply the stand-ard curriculum relative to the Taekwondo training population. The “Taekwondo Standard Curriculum” presented by Kukkiwon and the Korea Taekwondo Association in 2019 divided the subjects to be completed by the non-Poom-and-Dan-holders and Poom and Dan holders into the mandatory and optional courses. 1) Non-Poom-and-Dan-holders must complete the training period(40 hours x 9 levels = 360 hours) for 40 hours of unit time for each level from level 1 through level 9, respectively. 2) As for 1 Poom and Dan holders, the time of completion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 3 units = 240 hours), and as for 2 Poom and Dan holders, the time of comple-tion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 6 units = 480 hours), as for 3 Poom and Dan holders, the time of completion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 9 units = 720 hours), and as for 4 Poom and Dan holders, the time of completion for each unit is 80 hours, with the time of completion for the training period(80 hours x 12 units = 960 hours) are required, respectively. Conclusion: That is, for the Taekwondo curriculum, the trainees should not only comply with the period required after the promotion of Poom and Dan, but also should be required to complete the mandatory training time, thereby making it an even more effective approach toward achieving the educational goal of Taekwondo.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 최환석, "The Effects of TAEKWONDO Training on the Leadership Skills and Community Spirit of Middle School Girls", International Journal of Martial Arts, 5(1), pp.39~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  2. Choi Man-gyu, "Analysis on the Effect of Dahn-TAEKWONDO Training on the Improvement of Juvenile Spinal Asymmetry", International Journal of Martial Arts, 4(1), pp.10~17 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  3. Choi Bong-jun, "The Effect of Taekwondo Training on CRISIS Factors of School Violence Behavior of Adolescents in KOREA", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 1(1), pp.6~12 (2016), J-INSTITUTE
  4. Park Ju-sik, "The Effect of Functional Training on the Physical Strength Factor of Elite TAEKWONDO Athletes", Kinesiology, 4(1), pp.1~7 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  5. Hwansuk Choi, "The Effect of the Youth's Generativity Following Their Participation in MARTIAL ARTS Training on Social Adaptation and Social Happiness", International Journal of Martial Arts, 6(3), pp.23~35 (2021), J-INSTITUTE
  6. 조현, "태권도 지도자 감성리더십이 태권도장 운영에 미치는 영향", 무예연구, 12(4), pp.171~184 (2018), 한국무예학회
  7. Kwak J, "Analysis of Factors for Management of Successful Taekwondo School", Journal of Martial Arts, 3(2), pp.111~124 (2009)
  8. 고경진, "태권도장 운영 활성화를 위한 태권도지도자의 핵심역량에 대한 상대적 중요도 분석", 대한무도학회지, 22(3), pp.145~158 (2020), 대한무도학회[DOI]
  9. 류충완, "태권도장 운영특성에 따른 경영환경 및 시장지향성 차이에 관한 연구", 한국체육과학회지, 20(4), pp.463~475 (2011), 한국체육과학회
  10. 고경진, "태권도 지도자 역량 강화를 위한 내부마케팅 요인과수련생지향성 및 태권도장 비재무 운영성과에 관한 연구", 한국체육학회지, 52(5), pp.611~625 (2013), 한국체육학회
  11. 류충완, "전남지역 태권도장의 운영전략에 관한 연구", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 16(5), pp.1325~1334 (2005), 한국스포츠리서치
  12. 정명수, "태권도장 운영 실태를 통한 발전 방향", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 14(4), pp.923~932 (2003), 한국스포츠리서치
  13. 고봉수, "태권도장의 수련특성이 프로그램 운영과 만족도 및 재구매 의도에 미치는 영향", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 18(4), pp.875~884 (2007), 한국스포츠리서치
  14. 박종화, "빅데이터를 활용한 ‘2017년 무주 세계태권도선수권대회’ 탐색적 연구: 소셜 미디어 자료를 중심으로", 국기원 태권도연구, 9(3), pp.77~96 (2018), 국기원[DOI]
  15. 김영진, "태권도 시범경연대회의 현황 및 발전방안", 국기원 태권도연구, 9(4), pp.43~64 (2018), 국기원[DOI]
  16. 정현도, "전국 장애인 체육대회 태권도 선수 현황 및 경기 내용 분석", 국기원 태권도연구, 10(3), pp.169~189 (2019), 국기원[DOI]
  17. 이충영, "태권도장지도자의 인식을 통해 본 성인태권도교육 사례연구", 세계태권도문화학회, 8(4), pp.15~30 (2017), 세계태권도문화학회
  18. 김수정, "코로나바이러스감염증-19(COVID-19)을 통해 변화를 시도하는 태권도교육 프로그램과 지도사례에 대한 연구", 세계태권도문화학회, 11(3), pp.47~63 (2020), 세계태권도문화학회[DOI]
  19. 김동식, "태권도 교육 담론의 문화주의적 전환", 국기원 태권도연구, 10(4), pp.87~107 (2019), 국기원[DOI]
  20. 손천택, "태권도 표준교육과정의 개발과 과제", 국기원 태권도연구, 4(2), pp.1~17 (2013), 국기원[DOI]
  21. 김두한, "미국 태권도장 서비스품질요인의 상대적 중요도", 국기원 태권도연구, 6(2), pp.107~129 (2015), 국기원[DOI]
  22. 장권, "미국 내 태권도 수련생의 도장 선택요인 탐색", 국기원 태권도연구, 6(3), pp.63~80 (2015), 국기원[DOI]
  23. 유동현, "미국 인턴십 프로그램 참여 전･후 태권도전공 학생들이 인식하는 태권도 시범의 필요성에 관한 연구", 국기원 태권도연구, 8(1), pp.107~121 (2017), 국기원[DOI]
  24. 장권, "미국 내 한인 태권도장 성공요인 탐색", 한국스포츠학회, 11(3), pp.147~164 (2013), 한국스포츠학회
  25. 김태일, "미국 태권도장 지도자의 변혁적-거래적 리더십과 지도자신뢰 및 운동몰입의 관계", 한국체육과학회지, 21(3), pp.31~43 (2012), 한국체육과학회[DOI]
  26. Kim J, "An Analysis of Factors That Affect Training Satisfaction and Tournament Participation on American College Students", The Journal of Korean Alliance of Martial Arts, 8(2), pp.133~148 (2006)
  27. Yoo H, "Modern Sports Diplomat" (2015), Ingansarang
  28. Lee J, "1129 Day’s Chronicle Around the Korean War" (2014), Ujong
  29. Song H, "Taekwondo History Theory" (2008), Leemun
  30. Lee K, "Right Understanding of Taekwondo" (2002), Sanga
  31. Kukkiwon, "World Taekwondo Headquarters" (2021), Seoul
  32. Kiyouzi Kasao, "Introduction to New Karate" (1983), Shinsung
  33. Kim K, "History and Philosophy of Taekwondo" (2007), Yeungnam
  34. Kukkiwon, "Taekwondo Textbook" (2005), O-sung
  35. Lee KH, "What is Taekwondo Poomsae" (2010), Seoul
  36. Korea Taekwondo Association, "Taekwondo Club Standard Curriculum Commentary", KTA, ~ (2019)
  37. Lee KM, "Understanding of Taekwondo" (2002), Sang-A Planning

관련 논문AI추천

Research on the Difficulty of 9th Level Dan Promotion Test of Taekwondo오형근, 최성곤동북아학술저널연합 · International Journal of Martial Arts2022 · 제7권 제1호The development and operation of continuing training for low-dan holders and education programs for pre-Masters in the United States김홍식, 박상봉, 손천택, 임태희, 장용규국기원 · 국기원 태권도연구2016 · 제7권 제4호대한태권도협회 강사의 태권도장 교육프로그램 분석을 통한 태권도 교육체계 정립 방향 모색권기덕, 김하영국기원 · 국기원 태권도연구2025 · 제16권 제1호태권도 표준교육과정의 개발과 과제손천택국기원 · 국기원 태권도연구2013 · 제4권 제2호태권도지도자 양성을 위한 태권도학과 교육프로그램 개발박원비학교체육연구소 · Asian Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science2016 · 제4권 제1호태권도 표준교육과정 개발김기철, 유창완, 최치선국기원 · 국기원 태권도연구2013 · 제4권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

The Effect on Training Satisfaction and Training Continuation in the TAEKWONDO Gym Training ProgramMinjae Gilpp. 1-11Exploring the Training Program for the Essential Skills of TAEKWONDO Freestyle Poomsae장권, Mincheol Shinpp. 12-22Poomsae Players’ Perception and Improvement of TAEKWONDO Freestyle Poomsae CompetitionKwanyoung Park, 정재환pp. 33-41Status of the Implementation of Spectator’s Type TAEKWONDO Operation for Enhanced Interest in Taekwondo Competition : With a Focus on the Analysis of Perception of the KTA Power Taekwondo Premium League오형근, 윤정욱pp. 42-52Analysis of the Use of Defense Techniques of Korean JUDO Athletes According to their Gender and Grade조성구, Chiyoung Lee, 김재호pp. 53-66
원문 보기