中国个人破产制度立法研究
Research on the Legislation of China’s Personal Bankruptcy System
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
个人破产制度的核心构造之一是免责, 即通过免除剩余债务,让具备诚实秉性却不幸的债务人获得重生。是否拥有健全的个人破产制度, 已经成为衡量一个经济体破产法发达程度的重要指标。但是如何选择适合中国国情的个人破产制度是建立中国个人破产制度的关键。在现行的2007年《破产法》起草过程中,也有将个人破产纳入破产法的建议。但在当时,对企业破产立法尚有不同认识的情况下,很难推进个人破产制度的建立。目前据中国最高法院统计,进入执行程序的案件中,超过1/3的案件属于没有财产可执行的案件,根据这些案件统计可知,有大量的“资不抵债、不能清偿到期债务”的个人, 这些个人需要一个推出程序,帮助他们获得重生。 在很长的时间里中国社会对个人破产的认知和共识有着很大的差异。反对意见大致有三,一是社会主义国家在制度上可否允许个人破产制度;二是中国的传统观念,即“欠债还钱,天经地义”;三是中国的个人信用体系不够完善,建立个人破产制度后,容易被恶意债务人利用。经过长期的争议后,2019年2月27日,最高法院在法院执行工作五年改革纲要第11条中,提出了“推进完善强制执行法律体系及配套制度,开展与个人破产制度功能相当的试点工作”的建议。之后各地法院陆续发布了区域性执行业务指南,深圳还进行了地方立法。中国各地对个人破产制度的探索工作,为完善破产法律体系,推动出台个人破产法提供了有益经验。但上述工作仍存在部分局限性:首先是各地制度的差异化极有可能导致“破产移民”的出现;其次是地方法院出台的实施意见规定处分个人财产,但是对于个人财产的定性不明,缺乏有效的法律依据;再次是在确定个人破产案件的管辖法院级别时存在困难;最后是存在对债务人监管缺失的现象。 近年来,中国最高人民法院及政府相关部委积极推动出台个人破产相关制度、市场主体退出等个人破产相关的制度,这为个人破产法的出台奠定了政策基础。适时出台个人破产法不仅可以使个人破产案件有法可依,也可以完善中国破产法律制度。本文最后就中国的个人破产法立法提出立法模式、清算程序、自由财产、免责制度、专门破产法院等8项建议。
Abstract
One of the core structures of the personal bankruptcy system is exemption. That is through the exemption of remaining debts to rebirth the honest but unfortunate debtors. Whether it has a sound personal bankruptcy system has become an important indicator of the degree of development of an economy’s Bankruptcy Law. But how to choose a personal bankruptcy system which can suits China’s national conditions is the key to establishing China’s personal bankruptcy system. In the current drafting process of the 2007 Bankruptcy Law, there are also suggestions to include personal bankruptcy in the Bankruptcy Law. However, at that time, is was difficult to promote the establishment of a personal bankruptcy system with different understandings of corporate bankruptcy legislation. According to statistics from the Supreme Court of China, more than 1/3 of the cases that have no property to enforce. According to the statistics of these cases, there are a large number of individuals who are “insolvent and unable to pay off their debts”. These individuals need a roll-out procedure to help the rebirth. For a long time, Chinese society has very different perceptions and consensus on personal bankruptcy. There are roughly three objections. Ones is whether the socialist country can allow a personal bankruptcy system; the second is China’s traditional concept that “repaying debts is justified”; the third is that China’s personal credit system is not perfect and the establishment of a personal bankruptcy system if it is, it would be easy used by malicious debtors. After a long-term dispute, on February 27, 2019, in Article 11 of the Five-Year Reform Program for Court Enforcement Work, the Supreme Court proposed “Promote the Improvement of the Enforcement Legal System and Supporting Systems, and Launch a Pilot Program with Functions Equivalent to the Personal Bankruptcy System” recommendations. After that, local courts successively issued regional enforcement guidelines, and Shenzhen also implemented local legislation. The exploration of the personal bankruptcy system in various parts of china has provided useful experience for improving the bankruptcy legal system and promoting the promulgation of the personal bankruptcy law. However, the above work still has some limitations: firstly, the differentiation of local systems is very likely to lead to the emergence of “bankruptcy immigrants”, secondly, the implementation opinions issued by local courts stipulate the disposition of personal property, but the qualitative nature of personal property is not clear and lacks effectiveness. The legal basis for this; thirdly, there are difficulties in determining the level of the court of jurisdiction for personal bankruptcy cases; and finally, there is a lack of supervision of debtors. In recent years, the Supreme People’s Court of China and relevant government ministries have actively promoted the introduction of systems related to personal bankruptcy, market entity withdrawal, and other personal bankruptcy-related systems, which laid the policy foundation for the promulgation of the Personal Bankruptcy Law. The timely promulgation of the personal bankruptcy cases a legal basis, but also improve China’s bankruptcy legal system. This article finally puts forward 8 suggestions on China’s personal bankruptcy law legislation, including legislative model, liquidation procedures, free property, immunity system, and special bankruptcy courts.
참고문헌 (25)
- 설재순, "개인회생파산 실무와 사례" (2020), 중앙법률사무교육원
- 박민준, "개인파산절차와 개인회생절차 사이의 적정한 역할 분담을 위한 방안의 검토", 법조, 69(5), pp.298~339 (2020), 법조협회[DOI]
- 전병서, "개인채무자의 파산 및 면책에 관한 개정 논점", 법조 (2003)
- 陈夏红, "个人破产程序中教育贷款的免除困境与制度选择", 清华法学, 15(6) (2021)
- 耿文博, "南京法院为‘个人破产’探路", 江苏经济报, ~ (2021)
- 宫崎信太郎, "关于日本破产制度的问答", Nishimura (2011)
- 罗莎莎, "南京将推广诚信被执行人‘经济重生’试点工作", 法治日报, ~ (2021)
- 李宏伟, "我国构建个人破产制度的现实困境与法治对策", 中州学刊, (11) (2019)
- 刘颖, "日本的个人破产免责制度及其借镜", 北大法宝, (5) (2020)
- 林春挺, "首起个人破产案启示‘诚实而不幸者’如何得到救济", 第一财经报, ~ (2021)
- 江苏省高级法院课题组, "我国个人破产制度立法模式的选择", 中国应用法学, (5) (2021)
- 马学荣, "论新时代个人信用制度的完善-基于个人破产制度的视角", 征信, ~ (2020)
- 沈芳君, "个人债务集中清理是否探索与个人破产立法设想", 法治研究, (6) (2021)
- 汤维建, "关于建立我哥个人破产制度的构想(上)", 政法论坛, (3) (1995)
- 汤维建, "个人破产制度构建中的理论分歧, 共识和反思", 中国应用法学, (5) (2021)
- 唐应茂, "法院执行为什么这么难———转型国家中的政府、市场与法院" (2009), 北京大学出版社
- 徐斌, "论商自然人破产制度", 福州大学学报( 哲学社会科学版), (3) (2016)
- 吴守根著, "韩国个人破产制度实施现状、争议以及面临的课题", 中国政法大学学报, (2) (2020)
- 姚文峰, "美国教育券制度及其蕴含的公平意义", 当代教育论坛, (17) (2006)
- 赵万一, "论我国个人破产制度的构建", 法商研究, (3) (2014)
- 郑兴华, "论个人破产制度建构中的信用奖惩机制", 南海法学, (5) (2021)
- 张善斌, "个人破产热点的冷思考", 法学家, (6) (2021)
- Rafael I. Pardo, "Undue Hardship in the Bankruptcy Courts: An Empirical Assessment of the Discharge of Educational Debt", University of Cincinnati Law Review, 74(2)
- Milton Friedman, "Capitalism and Freedom" (2002), The University of Chicago Press
- Michael Simkovic, "Risk-Based Student Loans", Washington and Lee Law Review, 70(1) (2013)
