본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中国个人破产重整程序的建构

The Construction of Individual Reorganization Procedure in China

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

”可以刺激消费进而拉动经济增长, 但当居民债务超过一定规模后就对消费产生抑制作用, 例 如消费卡过度透支消费、 住房抵押贷款持续增长、 房贷违约率明显上升等情况。 由此可以看出, 中 国个人负债问题已经成为不定时炸弹, 随时准备引爆, 一旦爆炸必将给社会带来无可估量的影响。 至此, 个人破产制度的呼声被推至高潮。 个人破产制度的建立是中国优化营商环境的重要一环, 也是退出市场机制的重要组成部分。 在 2004年修改的《企业破产法》中, 有专家学者建议将个人破产制度纳入进来, 但由于当时司法经验不 足, 人们的社会观念固化和技术条件的不完善等等原因并未将个人破产制度纳入进来, 随着时间的 推移, 现如今的《企业破产法》在修改中是否将个人破产制度纳入进来众说纷纭。 但大部分的专家学 者都认为中国已经积累了大量的司法经验, 人们观念转换和技术的成熟发展, 应该建立专门的个人 破产法。 目前国外早已经实行个人破产制度, 但中国还尚未建立, 针对愈来愈多的自然人在市场经 济中丧失债务清偿能力的情况下, 基于矛盾的特殊性, 中国首次出台了《深圳经济特区个人破产条 例》(以下简称《深圳破产条例》), 在深圳进行试点工作, 并设置了破产清算, 和解和重整三种模式。 个 人破产不仅要保护“诚实而不幸”的债务人也要维护债权人的利益, 达到相应的利益平衡。 所以, 重整 程序将会成为中国未来个人破产程序的主要运用模式, 该模式主要针对“能还尽还”的债务人, 最大 限度地偿还债权人的债务。 《深圳破产条例》虽然规定了重整程序, 但由于受到种种局限性, 规定的 较为保守, 尤其是重整程序下对于程序的立法模式、 程序的启动主体、 程序方案的实施以及对程序 的事后保障措施的规定尚不完善。 在各地方立法模式中, 采用的是双轨制的自由选择型立法, 即允 许债务人自由选择破产程序, 但这可能会导致程序的滥用, 并可能损害债权人的权益。 在程序的启 动过程中, 主要的适用主体是商自然人, 但在某些地区, 将个人工商户纳入其中。 然而, 总体上, 并没 有将所有的自然人都视为个人破产的适用主体。 在申请过程中, 主要是由债务人提出的, 而债权人 尚未获得申请资格。 在程序方案的执行过程中, 提交的所有材料都是一致的, 并且没有对程序进行 分流, 同时也设置了相同的执行期限。 在程序的后期保护方面, 由于还没有建立一个完善的个人财 产登记制度, 这可能会导致债务人隐藏财产, 这不仅侵犯了债权人的权益, 还会降低社会信用制度 的完善程度。 美国、 德国、 日本和韩国的破产重整程序在百年前就已经制定实施, 积累了大量的个人 破产经验, 对中国具有较大的借鉴意义。 对立法例进行比较研究下, 在程序模式上实行双轨制限制 选择型, 制定相应的条件限制选择债务人自行选择破产模式。 在程序启动上扩大适用主体范围和申 请主体范围,在适用主体方面, 将《民法典》中所规定的自然人纳入到个人破产适用主体上, 在申请主 体方面, 授予债权人提出破产重整的权利。 同时, 兼顾效率与公平原则, 在程序方案实施上根据重整 程序的不同分别制定不同类型的方案随之予以批准并设置相应的执行期限,最后设立相应的事后保 障措施从而为中国制定属于中国特色的个人破产法提供借鉴。

Abstract

In the 2004 revision of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law, some experts and scholars suggested that a personal bankruptcy system be included, but it was not adopted at that time because the conditions were not yet ripe. In recent years, for more and more natural persons in the market economy in the loss of debt solvency, the market economy resource allocation under the personal bankruptcy system is indispensable to the existence of the system. Based on the specificity of the contradiction, China first introduced the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Personal Bankruptcy Regulations (hereinafter referred to as “Shenzhen Bankruptcy Regulations”), and set up three modes of bankruptcy liquidation, settlement and reorganization. However, personal bankruptcy should not only protect the “honest and unfortunate” debtor but also safeguard the interests of creditors and achieve a balance of interests between the two. Therefore, reorganization procedure will become the main mode of bankruptcy in China in the future. Marx once said “dialectics in the existing things in the affirmative understanding of the existing things at the same time contains the negative understanding of existing things”, “Shenzhen Bankruptcy Regulations” although the reorganization procedures for the relevant provisions, but because of various limitations, the provisions of the more conservative, especially reorganization procedures for the procedure of the legislative model, the procedure of the main body of the program, the implementation of the procedural program and the procedure of the legislative model, the main body of the program, the implementation of the program of the program and the procedure of the reorganization procedure, the reorganization procedure is the main mode of bankruptcy in China.However,due to various limitations, the provisions are relatively conservative, especially the provisions on the legislative model of the procedure, the subject of initiation of the procedure, the implementation of the procedural program, and the safeguards for the procedure after the event. In terms of the legislative model, China has adopted a two-track,free-choice legislative model, which is in line with China's legislative model at the present stage, but allowing the debtor to freely choose the bankruptey.procedure will lead to procedural abuses and infringe upon the interests of the creditors at the same time. In terms of the subject of initiation of the procedure, the subject of application mainly applies to commercial natural persons, with some regions including individual industrial and commercial households, but on the whole, not all natural persons are taken as the subject of application of personal bankruptcy, and in terms of the subject of application, it is mainly proposed by the debtor, and the creditors are not yet qualified to apply. In terms of the implementation of the procedural program,the materials submitted are the same, and there is no bifurcation of the procedure, and the same execution period is set. In the procedure of the aftermath of the security,has not yet established a perfect personal property registration system, easy to lead to the debtor to hide the property, not only violates the rights and interests of creditors and reduce the improvement of the social credit system. Hereby, this paper will be from the United States, Germany, Japan and South Korea's legislation for comparative study, in the procedural mode of the implementation of the two-track system to limit the choice of type, the formulation of the corresponding conditions to limit the choice of the debtor to choose their own mode of insolvency. In the process of starting to expand the scope of the applicable subject and the scope of the subject of the application, in the subject of the applicable subject, will be stipulated in the Civil Code of the natural person into the personal bankruptcy applicable subject, in the subject of the application, granting the creditor to put forward the right of bankruptcy and reorganization. At the same time, taking into account the principles of efficiency and fairness, in the implementation of the procedural program, according to the different reorganization procedures, respectively, different types of programs are formulated to be approved and set up the corresponding implementation period. Finally set up the corresponding aftermath safeguards so as to provide reference for the formulation of China's personal bankruptcy law with Chinese characteristics.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 史慧敏, "比较法视域下我国个人破产构建进路——以美国个人破产制度经验为借鉴", 特区经济, (9) (2023)
  2. 朱腾飞, "我国个人破产立法的实践与思考——以“深圳个人破产重整第一案”为切入", 法律适用, (9) (2023)
  3. 李曙光, "中国个人破产立法的制度障碍及其克服", 政法论坛, (5) (2023)
  4. 孙琳, "个人破产重整程序准入规则的中国模式, 中共青岛市委党校", 青岛行政学院学报, (2) (2023)
  5. 张紫璇, "关于构建我国个人破产制度的思考——以《深圳经济特区个人破产条例》为视角", 河北企业, (3) (2023)
  6. 谈萧杨绿丹, "个人破产与企业破产的制度融合", 经济法论坛, (2) (2022)
  7. 汤维建, "制定我国个人破产法应当处理好十种关系", 团结, (5) (2022)
  8. 王欣新, "破产法修改中的新制度建设", 法治研究, (4) (2022)
  9. 徐阳光韩玥, "个人破产的三重控制机制: 基于个人债务集中清理实践的分析", 法律适用, (6) (2022)
  10. 李曙光, "我国破产重整制度的多维解构及其改进", 法学评论, (3) (2022)
  11. 汤维建, "制定我国《个人破产法》的利弊分析及立法对策", 甘肃政法大学学报, (6) (2021)
  12. 徐阳光武诗敏, "个人破产立法的理论逻辑与现实进路", 中国人民大学学报, (5) (2021)
  13. 颜卉, "我国个人破产程序设置的模式选择", 甘肃社会科学, (2) (2021)
  14. 范健, "中国《民法典》颁行后的民商关系思考", 政法论坛, (2) (2021)
  15. 刘颖, "日本的个人破产免责制度及其借镜", 经贸法律评论, (5) (2020)
  16. 刘静, "个人更生类型程序的中国化路径", 经贸法律评论, (5) (2020)
  17. 吴守根陈景善, "韩国个人破产制度实施现状、 争议以及面临的课题", 中国政法大学学报, (2) (2020)
  18. 刘冰, "论我国个人破产制度的构建", 中国法学, (4) (2019)
  19. 卢泰岳李英, "韩国破产法最新修改与破产法院的设立", 中国政法大学学报, (4) (2018)
  20. 殷慧芬, "论个人重整", 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), (6) (2012)
  21. 何旺翔, "德国个人破产制度及其思考", 江南大学学报(人文社会科学版), (6) (2008)
  22. AndrejaTratnik, "Personal Bankruptcy", Slove-nian Law Review (2008)
  23. 查尔斯, "美国破产法新论" (2017), 中国政法大学出版社
  24. Frederick R. Austin, "United States Bankruptcy Court of the Eastern District of Michigan", Commer- cial Law League Journal (1923)
  25. 中島弘雅, "代倒產手続法" (2013), 有斐閣
  26. 山本和彦, "日本倒产处理法入门" (2016), 法律出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)