부동산 PF 위기 대응 방안연구

Abstract

Second, in order to expand the proportion of equity in the business, the government needs to actively induce a certain part of the venture capital to be naturally invested in the real estate development project through strengthening the capital requirements of the implementing entity, introducing and revitalizing mezzanine finance, and forming partnerships with various investors. Third, PF should be treated on the basis of the project's business feasibility without relying on the construction company's guarantee. In order to do so, business feasibility review and risk analysis techniques need to be much more advanced than they are now. In addition to nurturing professional manpower of financial suppliers, it is necessary to develop a system that accurately and comprehensively analyzes business performance and risk factors such as location, demand, and cash flow based on various data, as well as the performance ability of implementers and contractors. Fourth, in relation to PF business performance, we need to provide the right information to the market such as the sale rate and accidental debt, so that market participants can thoroughly analyze the business feasibility based on the data, and create a sound market environment and make a sober and accurate judgment in determining investment, and strict management and supervision by the government is necessary. This study is a timely study at a time when Korea's real estate PF crisis is repeatedly occurring, and we expect that an effective real estate PF structure based on the evaluation of the collateral value and development profit of the business will be established while responding appropriately to the real estate PF crisis in the future and sharing risks among market participants.