Research on Social Value Measurement of Chinese Social Enterprises: Application of SPC Social Outcome Measurement Mechanism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since 2015, social enterprises have started to draw attention as the type of organization that hasengaged in the social economy practice and has made some practical achievements. However, it isstill very limited in terms of market expansion and social impact. One of the key problems lies inthe lack of an effective way to quantify the social value created by social enterprises. Social valueevaluation of social enterprises can promote social enterprises to acquire more resources andgarner more recognition from society which can contribute to expanding the scale and impact ofsocial enterprises. An in-depth systematic study is urgently needed. Believing that social value canpositively impact the sustainable development of social enterprises, this research applies a specificmeasurement mechanism to measuring social value produced by social enterprises in China throughthe case study method. It explores the feasibility of applying and promoting the social valueevaluation system in China and provides insights for further effective practices. First, it grasps thedevelopment status and problems of social enterprises in China. Based on a systematic assessmentof the features of the social value measurement mechanism from an international perspective andanalysis of its application prospects in China, we selected 10 typical Chinese social enterprises asstudy subjects, applying the SPC social outcome measurement mechanism to measure the socialvalue they have produced. Finally, based on the measurement process and results, it providessuggestions for measuring and applying the social value of social enterprises in China from theangle of the development of social enterprises and their ecological environment. In summary, theSPC social outcome measurement mechanism works well among Chinese social enterprises andhas great application prospects. At the same time, its systems and models still have much room forimprovement according to the development stage, development characteristics, and ecologicalenvironment of Chinese social enterprises.
Abstract
Since 2015, social enterprises have started to draw attention as the type of organization that hasengaged in the social economy practice and has made some practical achievements. However, it isstill very limited in terms of market expansion and social impact. One of the key problems lies inthe lack of an effective way to quantify the social value created by social enterprises. Social valueevaluation of social enterprises can promote social enterprises to acquire more resources andgarner more recognition from society which can contribute to expanding the scale and impact ofsocial enterprises. An in-depth systematic study is urgently needed. Believing that social value canpositively impact the sustainable development of social enterprises, this research applies a specificmeasurement mechanism to measuring social value produced by social enterprises in China throughthe case study method. It explores the feasibility of applying and promoting the social valueevaluation system in China and provides insights for further effective practices. First, it grasps thedevelopment status and problems of social enterprises in China. Based on a systematic assessmentof the features of the social value measurement mechanism from an international perspective andanalysis of its application prospects in China, we selected 10 typical Chinese social enterprises asstudy subjects, applying the SPC social outcome measurement mechanism to measure the socialvalue they have produced. Finally, based on the measurement process and results, it providessuggestions for measuring and applying the social value of social enterprises in China from theangle of the development of social enterprises and their ecological environment. In summary, theSPC social outcome measurement mechanism works well among Chinese social enterprises andhas great application prospects. At the same time, its systems and models still have much room forimprovement according to the development stage, development characteristics, and ecologicalenvironment of Chinese social enterprises.
참고문헌 (22)
- 사회성과인센티브 프로젝트의 사회성과 측정(Measuring social Performance of Social Outcomes Incentive Project), "라준영", 사회성 과 인센티브추진단, ~ (2016)
- "사회성과인센티브 사회성과 측정 매뉴얼"(the Guidelines for the Measurement of Social Outcomes of SPC Projects), "라준영", 사회성과신센티브추진단, ~ (2017)
- 라준영, "사회성과인센티브(SPC)와 사회적 기업의 사회적 가치측정: 사회성과의 화폐가치 환산", 사회적가치와 기업연구, 11(2), pp.133~161 (2018), 사단법인 사회적기업학회[DOI]
- 라준영, "기업활동의 사회적 가치 측정: 화폐가치 환산을 중심으로(Social Value Measurement of Business Activities: Focused on The Conversion of Monetary Value)", pp.281~311 (2018)
- 서민근, "사회성과인센티브(SPC)참여기업의 기업가정신과 기업의 재무성과와 비재무적 성과의 관계에서 기업지향성의 매개효과", 국제회계연구, (106), pp.121~141 (2022), 한국국제회계학회[DOI]
- 윤경옥, "사회적기업의 사회성과인센티브가 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 세무와회계저널, 23(5), pp.209~233 (2022), 한국세무학회
- 이은령, "사회성과인센티브(SPC)가 사회적 기업의 목표변화와 사회성과에 미치는 영향", 경영과 정보연구, 40(4), pp.167~183 (2021), 대한경영정보학회[DOI]
- 홍현우, "‘사회성과인센티브 프로그램’이 참여 사회적 기업에 미치는 영향에 대한 이론적 분석과 실증연구", 경제학연구, 69(3), pp.97~132 (2021), 한국경제학회[DOI]
- Jung, S. M., "Social Performance Incentives in Mission-Driven Firms", Management Science, 68(10), pp.7631~7657 (2022)
- "国家发 展改革 委关于印发社会领域相关专项中央预算内投资专项管理办法的通知, 中国" (2022)[URL]
- "政府投资条例" (2022)[URL]
- 中国社会企业发展状况调研报告, "国务院发展研究中心公共管理与人力资源研究所 “社会企业研究” 课题组", 国家治理周刊, ~, pp.No. 359 (2021)
- 金仁仙, "年中国社会企业发展报告, 中国社会组织 蓝皮书: 中国社会组织报告 (2021)", pp.149~177 (2021), 中国社会科学出版社
- 金仁仙, "2022年中国社会企业发展报告, 中国社会组织蓝 皮书" (2023), 北京中国社会科出版社
- 李兰, "我国社会企业发展状况调研报告", 国家治理周刊, 2021(359), pp.43~48 (2021)
- 刘先良, "社会企业认证在中国:法律属性与体系构建", 中国非营利评论, 25(1), pp.201~226 (2020)
- "626个样本调研:社会企业待解问题多,亟须资金和政策支持(626 Sample Surveys: Social Enterprises Have Many Problems to Be Solved, Urgent Need for Financial and Policy Support)" (2022)[URL]
- 罗伟, "双元价值驱动的社会企业双元经营系统研究——以微客国际服务有限公司为例", 管理案例研究与评论, 13(3), pp.260~273 (2020)
- 罗文恩, "构建社会企业身份:中国大陆、香港和台湾地区 社企认证实践比较分析", 中国非营利评论, 23(1), pp.86~109 (2019)
- 王世强, "社会企业的官方定义及其认定标准", 社团管理研究, (6), pp.38~41 (2012)
- "中国社会企业 2020 年调研报告" (2020)[URL]
- (2020)[URL]
