Key Factors for Success in Different Types of Social Enterprises in China: A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Integrating the scenario of the co-existence of different types of social enterprises in China with lessons from the institutional development of social enterprises worldwide, this study systematically investigates and identifies a set of key factors that may influence the success of Chinese social enterprises. The purpose of this research is to elevate the development of Chinese social enterprises, proffer suggestions for relevant policymakers, and enable these organizations to solve the context-specific social issues more effectively. Building upon extant research on social enterprise typologies and the key factors that affect organizational success, we construct our theoretical frameworks by examining various government, non-government, and organizational elements. The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is then employed to empirically scrutinize two mainstream types of social enterprises in China – social enterprises registered in Industrial and Commercial Bureau (ICB-registered SEs) and social enterprises registered in Civil Affairs Bureau (CAB-registered SEs) – as well as the key factors that may influence their social and economic performances. Our analysis reveals that the key factors that influence these two types of social enterprises are heterogeneous, and the social and economic missions of the same type of social enterprises are by no means antithetical. We further argue that nurturing internal and external environments is imperative for the development of Chinese social enterprises, which encompasses certification system building, awareness raising, ecosystem constructing, and so on. Different types of social enterprises also need to strengthen their own advantages and make up for their deficiencies by mutual cross-fertilization.
Abstract
Integrating the scenario of the co-existence of different types of social enterprises in China with lessons from the institutional development of social enterprises worldwide, this study systematically investigates and identifies a set of key factors that may influence the success of Chinese social enterprises. The purpose of this research is to elevate the development of Chinese social enterprises, proffer suggestions for relevant policymakers, and enable these organizations to solve the context-specific social issues more effectively. Building upon extant research on social enterprise typologies and the key factors that affect organizational success, we construct our theoretical frameworks by examining various government, non-government, and organizational elements. The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is then employed to empirically scrutinize two mainstream types of social enterprises in China – social enterprises registered in Industrial and Commercial Bureau (ICB-registered SEs) and social enterprises registered in Civil Affairs Bureau (CAB-registered SEs) – as well as the key factors that may influence their social and economic performances. Our analysis reveals that the key factors that influence these two types of social enterprises are heterogeneous, and the social and economic missions of the same type of social enterprises are by no means antithetical. We further argue that nurturing internal and external environments is imperative for the development of Chinese social enterprises, which encompasses certification system building, awareness raising, ecosystem constructing, and so on. Different types of social enterprises also need to strengthen their own advantages and make up for their deficiencies by mutual cross-fertilization.
참고문헌 (43)
- Alegre I，, "Social innovation success factors:hospitality and tourism social enterprises", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(6), pp.1155~1176 (2016)
- Alter K, "Social enterprise typology", Virtue ventures LLC, 12(01), pp.1~124 (2007)
- Bartes, František, "Competitive struggle of enterprises" (2003), CH Beck publishing house
- Bennett A, "QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods", Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), pp.455~476 (2006)
- New Frontiers in the Legal Structure and Legislation of Social Enterprises in Europe: A Comparative Analysis, "Fabrizio Cafaggi", 30~95, pp.EUI-LAW Working Papers，Vol.16 (2008)
- Fan D, "Localized learning by emerging multinational enterprises in developed host countries: A fuzzy-set analysis of Chinese foreign direct investment in Australia", International Business Review, 25, pp.187~203 (2016)
- Felício J A, "Social value and organizational performance in non-profit social organizations: Social entrepreneurship，leadership，and socioeconomic context effects", Journal of Business Research, 66(10), pp.2139~2146 (2013)
- Mawson J., "strategic networks and regional development", International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 30(1, pp.2) (2010), 66~83
- User’s guide to fuzzy-set, "qualitative comparative analysis", Ragin C C, 2008
- Ragin C C, "Between complexity and parsimony: limited diversity，counterfactual cases，and comparative anal⁃ ysis" (2005), publishing house for social sciences
- Satar M S, "A conceptual model of critical success factors for Indian social enterprises", World Journal of Entrepreneurship，Management and Sustainable Development, 12, pp.113~138 (2016)
- Sharir M, "Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs", Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.6~20 (2006)
- Sharir M, "Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs", Journal of World Business, 41(1), pp.6~20 (2006)
- SJV Billy, "Understanding Key Success Factors for Starting Social Enterprises", Master, pp.2016
- Thompson J L., "The world of the social entrepreneur", International journal of public sector management, 15(5), pp.412~431 (2002)
- Todres M, "Developing emerging social enterprise through capacity building", Social Enterprise Journal, 2(1), pp.61~72 (2006)
- Vasakarla V., "A study on social entrepreneurship and the characteristics of social entrepreneurs", ICFAI Journal of management research, 7(4), pp.32~40 (2008)
- Weppen J V D, "Social enterprises in tourism: an exploratory study of operational models and success factors", Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(3), pp.497~511 (2012)
- Wronka M, "Analyzing the success of social enterprises: critical success factors perspective", Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management &Innovation: Proceedings of the Management，Knowledge and Learning International Conference, pp.593~605 (2013)
- YoungChool Choi, "Analysis of Current Conditions Facing Social Enterprises in Korea: Policy Issues Regarding Their Sustainable Development", International Journal of Business and Social Research，MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, 4(3), pp.119~125 (2014)
- 陈雅丽(Yali Chen), "香港社会企业的发展经验及启示", 理论月刊, (12), pp.187~189 (2014)
- 迟永(Yong Chi), "美国介入领土争端的行为——基于模糊集定性比较分析的解释", 世界经济与政治, (10), pp.56~80 (2014)
- 郝诗语(Shiyu Hao), "探索补充政府购买社工服务的积极路径——社会企业", 现代经济信息, (4), pp.66~ (2016)
- 郝琴(Qin Hao), "郝琴，社会责任国家标准解读" (2015), 中国经济出版社
- 姜广秀(Guangxiu Jiang), "慈善组织开办社会企业策略——成功因素分析", 消费导刊, (08), pp.119~ (2008)
- 金仁仙(Renxian Jin), "韩国社会企业发展现状、评价及其经验借鉴", 北京社会科学, (5), pp.122~128 (2015)
- 金仁仙(Renxian Jin), "中国社会企业的现状、评析及其发展战略", 兰州学刊, (10), pp.188~195 (2016)
- 金永生, "创业导向如何影响企业绩效——模糊集定性比较分析", 科技进步与对策, (6), pp.88~94 (2017)
- 李健(Jian Li), "政府如何促进社会企业发展？——来自新加坡的经验", 经济体制改革, (5), pp.19~24 (2016)
- 李健(Jian Li), "条条大陆通罗马？——国外社会企业立法指向及经验启示", 经济社会体制比较, (3), pp.80~88 (2017)
- 李健, "社会企业与社会治理创新：模式与路径", 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), (3), pp.9~15 (2014)
- 陆军, "社会企业的财税支持政策:国际经验及启示", 学习与探索, (6), pp.84~91 (2016)
- 彭劲松, "社会企业商业模式研究——以广东残友集团为例", 江西社会科学, (4), pp.224~227 (2012)
- 舒博(Bo Shu), "社会企业的崛起及在中国的发展", pp.2010
- 王世强(Shiqiang Wang), "社会企业’概念解析", 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), (5), pp.37~42 (2012)
- 王世强(Shiqiang Wang), "社会企业的官方定义及其认定标准", 社团管理研究, (06), pp.38~41 (2012)
- 王世强(Shiqiang Wang), "政府推动社会企业发展的政策措施:国际经验与中国路径", 天津行政学院学报, (02), pp.103~109 (2013)
- 夏鑫, "定性比较分析的研究逻辑: 兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示", 工业工程与管理, (10), pp.97~107 (2014)
- 项继权, "社会企业的产生与发展: 关键要素与驱动主体", 湖北行政学院学报, (5), pp.77~82 (2014)
- 余晓敏, "国际比较视野下的中国社会企业", 经济社会体制比较, (01), pp.163~171 (2011)
- 张军果, "社会企业:内涵·欧美发展经验及其启示", 企业经济, (4), pp.62~66 (2015)
- "南都基金会等(China Social Enterprise and Impact Investment Forum, Narada Foundation, etc., 2019)，2019中国社会企业与社会投资行业扫描调研报告" (2019)[URL]
- 周平(Ping Zhou), "日本长寿企业的特征与可持续经营模式", 山东财政学院学报, 29(3), pp.71~83 (2017)