본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Knowledge Combination and the Usefulness of Inventions: Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Technological Change

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The study examines the effects of knowledge combination and of its interaction with technological change on the usefulness of inventions. We argue that inventing with knowledge components of prior art or with those in a variety of technical fields results in useful inventions, which changes after the emergence of dominant design because external actors’ perception of which knowledge components are appropriate in current technological environments changes. Based on data from U.S. granted optical disc patents filed from 1992 to 2000, the results show that inventions with more new knowledge components relative to their prior art are less useful but that inventions with more diversified knowledge components are more useful. Also, the empirical findings show that the negative relationship between new knowledge components of inventions and their usefulness strengthens after dominant design emerges.

Abstract

The study examines the effects of knowledge combination and of its interaction with technological change on the usefulness of inventions. We argue that inventing with knowledge components of prior art or with those in a variety of technical fields results in useful inventions, which changes after the emergence of dominant design because external actors’ perception of which knowledge components are appropriate in current technological environments changes. Based on data from U.S. granted optical disc patents filed from 1992 to 2000, the results show that inventions with more new knowledge components relative to their prior art are less useful but that inventions with more diversified knowledge components are more useful. Also, the empirical findings show that the negative relationship between new knowledge components of inventions and their usefulness strengthens after dominant design emerges.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. M. B. Heeley, "The recency of technological inputs and financial performance", Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), pp.723~744 (2008)
  2. O. Alexy, "Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity", Academy of Management Review, 38(2), pp.270~291 (2013)
  3. P. K. Toh, "Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm's technological specialization", Organization Science, 24(4), pp.1214~1236 (2013)
  4. L. Fleming, "Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success", Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), pp.443~475 (2007)
  5. P. G. Audia, "Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry", Management Science, 53(1), pp.1~15 (2007)
  6. L. Fleming, "Recombinant uncertainty in technological search", Management Science, 41(1), pp.117~132 (2001)
  7. L. Fleming, "Science as a map in technological search", Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), pp.909~928 (2004)
  8. M. A. Schilling, "Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences", Research Policy, 40(10), pp.1321~1331 (2011)
  9. S. Grodal, "The coevolution of technologies and categories during industry emergence", Academy of Management Review, 40(3), pp.423~445 (2015)
  10. S. Kaplan, "Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change", Research Policy, 37(5), pp.790~805 (2008)
  11. J. P. Murmann, "Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change", Research Policy, 35(7), pp.925~952 (2006)
  12. R. Kapoor, "What firms make vs. what they know: How firms' production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change", Organization Science, 23(5), pp.1227~1248 (2012)
  13. J. B. Sørensen, "Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), pp.81~112 (2000)
  14. S. Kaplan, "The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation", Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), pp.1435~1457 (2015)
  15. S. Jain, "Pragmatic agency in technology standards setting: The case of Ethernet", Research Policy, 41(9), pp.1643~1654 (2012)
  16. S. den Uijl, "Managing intellectual property using patent pools:Lessons from three generations of pools in the optical disc industry", California Management Review, 55(4), pp.31~50 (2013)
  17. T. Rayna, "What makes patent pools successful? An analysis of optical disc and mobile phone industries", International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 19(1-2), pp.6~29 (2015)
  18. L. G. Zucker, "Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology", Management Science, 48(1), pp.138~153 (2002)
  19. J. M. Podolny, "Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991", American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), pp.659~689 (1996)
  20. J. G. March, "Organizations" (1993), Blackwell Publishers
  21. R. Katila, "Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction", Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), pp.1183~1194 (2002)
  22. J. Denrell, "Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect", Organization Science, 12(5), pp.523~538 (2001)
  23. M. Gruber, "Knowledge recombination across technological boundaries:Scientists vs. engineers", Management Science, 59(4), pp.837~851 (2013)
  24. G. Carnabuci, "Where do firms’recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination", Strategic Management Journal, 34(13), pp.1591~1613 (2013)
  25. J. Singh, "Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?", Management Science, 56(1), pp.41~56 (2010)
  26. A. Nerkar, "Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm", Management Science, 51(5), pp.771~785 (2005)
  27. J. Alcácer, "Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations", Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), pp.774~779 (2006)
  28. M. Trajtenberg, "A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations", RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), pp.172~187 (1990)
  29. M. Benner, "Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity", Research Policy, 37(9), pp.1556~1567 (2008)
  30. A. M. Joshi, "When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry", Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), pp.1139~1160 (2011)
  31. D. Dranove, "The Dvd-vs.-Divx standard war: Empirical evidence of network effects and preannouncement effects", Journal of Economics &Management Strategy, 12(3), pp.363~386 (2003)
  32. P. M. Wiegmann, "Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda", Research Policy, 46(8), pp.1370~1386 (2017)
  33. R. Garud, "Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java", Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), pp.196~214 (2002)
  34. J. Lee, "The era of incremental change in the technology innovation life cycle: An analysis of the automotive emission control industry", Research Policy, 42(8), pp.1469~1481 (2013)
  35. B. Kim, "The impact of the timing of patents on innovation performance", Research Policy, 45(4), pp.914~928 (2016)
  36. K. Vakili, "Collaboration promotion of technology standards and the impact on innovation, industry structure, and organizational capabilities: Evidence from modern patent pools", Organization Science, 27(6), pp.1504~1524 (2016)
  37. W. Schoenmakers, "The technological origins of radical inventions", Research Policy, 39(8), pp.1051~1059 (2010)
  38. A. Mehta, "Identifying the age profile of patent citations: New estimates of knowledge diffusion", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(7), pp.1179~1204 (2010)
  39. J. Stock, "Introduction to Econometrics" (2003), Addison Wesley
  40. M. Trajtenberg, "University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), pp.19~50 (1997)
  41. B. H. Hall, "A note on the bias in Herfindahl-type measures based on count data", Revue d'économie industrielle, 110(2), pp.149~156 (2005)
  42. A. Taylor, "Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams", Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.723~740 (2006)
  43. J. Bessen, "The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics", Research Policy, 37(5), pp.932~945 (2008)
  44. R. M. O’Brien, "A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors", Quality & Quantity, 41(5), pp.673~690 (2007)
  45. D. J. Miller, "The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms", Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), pp.307~325 (2007)
  46. S. Arts, "Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention", Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(6), pp.1215~1246 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (32건)