Influences of intellectual property management and intermediary services on corporate licensing activities
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Patented technological-knowledge exploitation by out-licensing is an important issue for strategic technology management. The systematic approach to technology licensing appears to be critical for the creation of new opportunities and the capture of value from a firm’s own technology assets. This study investigates what drives two modes of IP licensing activities: the ‘simultaneous own using and out-licensing’ and the ‘only out-licensing.’ This study empirically analyzes how the firms’ IP licensing activities are affected by IP-related managerial activities (e.g. IP planning and auditing), the type of IP organization, and the use of intermediary services, by using a firm-level data from the “2007 Intellectual Property-related Activities Survey in Korea.” Our findings show that firms conducting IP planning and auditing tend to license out more patents through simultaneously exploiting technologies internally and externally. In addition, this study finds that firms with the project-based IP organization tend to license more patents through the purely external technology exploitation. Finally, the collaboration with technology intermediary service providers enhances the simultaneous internal and external technology exploitation.
Abstract
Patented technological-knowledge exploitation by out-licensing is an important issue for strategic technology management. The systematic approach to technology licensing appears to be critical for the creation of new opportunities and the capture of value from a firm’s own technology assets. This study investigates what drives two modes of IP licensing activities: the ‘simultaneous own using and out-licensing’ and the ‘only out-licensing.’ This study empirically analyzes how the firms’ IP licensing activities are affected by IP-related managerial activities (e.g. IP planning and auditing), the type of IP organization, and the use of intermediary services, by using a firm-level data from the “2007 Intellectual Property-related Activities Survey in Korea.” Our findings show that firms conducting IP planning and auditing tend to license out more patents through simultaneously exploiting technologies internally and externally. In addition, this study finds that firms with the project-based IP organization tend to license more patents through the purely external technology exploitation. Finally, the collaboration with technology intermediary service providers enhances the simultaneous internal and external technology exploitation.
참고문헌 (62)
- Amesse, F., "Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy", Research Policy, 30(9), pp.1459~1478 (2001)
- Arora, A., "Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing", Management Science, 52(2), pp.293~308 (2006)
- Arora, A., "Licensing the market for technology", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), pp.277~295 (2003)
- Arora, A., "Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy" (2001), MIT Press
- Bessant, J., "Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer", Research Policy, 24(1), pp.97~114 (1995)
- Brockhoff, K., "Technology management in the company of the future", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 8(2), pp.175~189 (1996)
- Brockhoff, K., "Technology management as part of strategic planning-some empirical results", R&D Management, 28(3), pp.129~138 (1998)
- Bryant, T. A., "Technology brokers in the North American software industry: getting the most out of mismatched dyads", International Journal of Technology Management, 16(1), pp.281~290 (1998)
- Burgelman, R. A., "A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy", Academy of Management Review, 8(1), pp.61~70 (1983)
- Cassiman, B., "In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition", Management Science, 52(1), pp.68~82 (2006)
- Ch’ang, S., "Intellectual property auditing: a road to riches", Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 35(2), pp.169~177 (2003)
- Chesbrough, H., "The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property", California Management Review, 45(3), pp.33~58 (2003)
- Chesbrough, H., "Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape" (2006), Harvard Business School Press
- Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128~152 (1990)
- Davis, J. L., "Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets" (2001), John Wiley & Sons
- Dussauge, P., "Strategic Technology Management" (1992), Wiley
- Dyer, J. H., "How to make strategic alliances work", MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), pp.37~43 (2001)
- Elton, J. J., "Intellectual property: partnering for profit", The McKinsey Quarterly, 2002 Special Edition, (4), pp.58~67 (2002)
- Escher, J.-P., "Design and implementation of technology marketing organizations. in: Technology and Innovation Management on the Move", pp.215~228 (2003), Orell Fussli
- Escher, J.-P., "Technology Marketing in Technology-Based Enterprises-The Process and Organization Structure of External Technology Deployment", 박사, pp.2004
- Ford, D., "Develop your technology strategy", Long Range Planning, 21(5), pp.85~95 (1988)
- Ford, D., "Taking technology to market", Harvard Business Review, 59(2), pp.117~126 (1981)
- Fosfuri, A., "The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of echnology licensing", Strategic Management Journal, 27(12), pp.1141~1158 (2006)
- George, V. P., "Performance of alliances formative stages and changing organizational and environmental influences", R&D Management, 29(4), pp.379~389 (1999)
- Gerybadze, A., "Technology forecasting as a process of organizational intelligence", R&D Management, 24(2), pp.131~140 (1994)
- Granstrand, O., "Corporate management of intellectual property in Japan", International Journal of Technology Management, 19(1), pp.121~148 (2000)
- Granstrand, O., "The economics & management of technology marketing: towards a pro-licensing era?", International Journal of Technology Management, 27, pp.209~240 (2004)
- Grindley, P. C., "Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics", California Management Review, 39(2), pp.8~41 (1997)
- Kim, Y., "Market structure and technology licensing: evidence from US manufacturing", Applied Economics Letters, 11(10), pp.631~637 (2004)
- Kline, D., "Sharing the corporate crown jewels", MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), pp.89~93 (2003)
- Koruna, S., "External technology commercialization-policy guidelines", International Journal of Technology Management, 24(2), pp.241~254 (2004)
- Lavie, D., "The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view", Academy of Management Review, 31(3), pp.638~658 (2006)
- Lichtenthaler, E., "Organising the external technology exploitation process: current practices and future challenges", International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2), pp.255~271 (2004)
- Lichtenthaler, E., "The choice of technology intelligence methods in multinationals: towards a contingency approach", International Journal of Technology Management, 32(3), pp.388~407 (2005)
- Lichtenthaler, U., "Technology exploitation strategies in the context of open innovation", International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1), pp.1~21 (2006)
- Lichtenthaler, U., "Hierarchical strategies and strategic fit in the keep-or-sell decision", Management Decision, 45(3), pp.340~359 (2007)
- Lichtenthaler, U., "Externally commercializing technology assets: an examination of different process stages", Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), pp.445~464 (2008)
- Lichtenthaler, U., "Intermediary services in the markets for technology: organizational antecedents and performance consequences", Organization Studies, 29(7), pp.1003~1035 (2008)
- Lichtenthaler, U., "Technology commercialization intelligence: organizational antecedents and performance consequences", Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 76(3), pp.301~315 (2009)
- Maddala, G.S., "Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Makadok, R., "Strategic factor market intelligence: an application of information economics to strategy formulation and competitor intelligence", Management Science, 47(12), pp.1621~1638 (2001)
- Mathews, J.A., "Strategizing by firms in the presence of markets for resources", Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(6), pp.1157~1193 (2003)
- Morgan, E.J., "Technology broking activities in Europe-a survey", International Journal of Technology Management, 12(3), pp.306~367 (1996)
- Motohashi, K., "Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms", Research Policy, 37(9), pp.1548~1555 (2008)
- Mowery, D., "Firm structure, government policy, and the organization of industrial research", Business History Review, 58(4), pp.504~531 (1984)
- Nevens, T. M., "Commercializing technology: what the best companies do", Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp.154~163 (1990)
- Palomeras, N., "An analysis of pure-revenue technology licensing", Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(4), pp.971~994 (2007)
- Pisano, G., "The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.153~176 (1990)
- Porter, M.E., "From competitive advantage to corporate strategy", Harvard Business Review, 65(3), pp.43~59 (1987)
- Rivette, K.G., "Discovering new value in intellectual property", Harvard Business Review, 78(7), pp.54~66 (2000)
- Sullivan, P. H., "Establishing an out-licensing activity. in: Technology Licensing: Corporate Strategies for Maximizing Value", pp.83~96 (1996), John Wiley & Sons
- Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy", Research Policy, 15(6), pp.285~305 (1986)
- Teece, D. J., "Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.55~79 (1998)
- Teece, D. J., "Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.55~79 (1998)
- Teece, D. J., "Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509~533 (1997)
- Tschirky, H., "Technology marketing: a new core competence of technology-intensive enterprises", International Journal of Technology Management, 20(3), pp.459~474 (2000)
- Van den Bosch, F. A. J., "Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities", Organization Science, 10(5), pp.551~568 (1999)
- Verona, G., "Innovation and virtual environments: towards virtual knowledge brokers", Organization Studies, 27(6), pp.765~788 (2006)
- Veugelers, R., "Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms", Research Policy, 28(1), pp.63~80 (1999)
- Williamson, O.E., "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting" (1985), The Free Press
- Wilson, A. E., "The intellectual property (IP) audit: an effective IP asset management tool", Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 8(1), pp.96~99 (2003)
