본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis on the Multi-technology Capabilities of Korea and Taiwan Using Patent Bibliometrics

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류기술정책

초록

This paper explores multi-technology capabilities between Korea and Taiwan by analyzing the pattern of inventive activities concerning technology fusion by using patent bibliometrics. Although two countries exhibit a similar level of invention activities and high degree of specialization in emerging technologies measured by the number and technological fields of their US patents, innovation systems in two countries differ. MTCs (multi-technology corporations) are stronger in Korea national innovation system while small innovative firms play important roles in Taiwan national innovation system. Technology fusion has been an important source of technological innovation, and it suggests possible advantage for the Korean innovation system because it is a common belief that global size firms - most of them are multi-technology corporations - can perform better in multi-technology fusion and scientific research. The result of patent bibliometrics suggests rather complex answers to the belief. Even though Korea shows slight advantage, it may not be ascribed to the large MTCs.

Abstract

This paper explores multi-technology capabilities between Korea and Taiwan by analyzing the pattern of inventive activities concerning technology fusion by using patent bibliometrics. Although two countries exhibit a similar level of invention activities and high degree of specialization in emerging technologies measured by the number and technological fields of their US patents, innovation systems in two countries differ. MTCs (multi-technology corporations) are stronger in Korea national innovation system while small innovative firms play important roles in Taiwan national innovation system. Technology fusion has been an important source of technological innovation, and it suggests possible advantage for the Korean innovation system because it is a common belief that global size firms - most of them are multi-technology corporations - can perform better in multi-technology fusion and scientific research. The result of patent bibliometrics suggests rather complex answers to the belief. Even though Korea shows slight advantage, it may not be ascribed to the large MTCs.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. "A Distributive Comparison of Enterprise Size in Korea and Taiwan", 35, pp.382~400 (1997)
  2. "Specialization and Size of Technological Activities in Industrial Countries The Analysis of Patent Data", 21, pp.79~93 (1992)
  3. "Asia's Next Giant" (1989), Oxford University Press.
  4. "Beyond Late Development : Taiwan's Upgrading Policies" (2003), MIT Press.
  5. "Markets for Technology" (2001), MIT Press
  6. "Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003", 26(5-6), pp.644~664 (2006)
  7. "Knowledge Relatedness in Firm Technological Diversification", 32, pp.69~87 (2003)
  8. "Strategies for Technological Development in South Korea and Taiwan the Case of Semiconductors", 25(5), pp.759~783 (1996)
  9. "A Reprise of Firm Size and R&D", 106, pp.925~951 (1996)
  10. "Catching-up and Post-Crisis Industrial Upgrading: Searching for New Sources of Growth in Korea's Electronics Industry" (2000), East-West Center.
  11. "Economics of Technology" (1994)
  12. "Managing Innovation in Multi-Technology Corporation", 19, pp.35~60 (1990)
  13. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators - A Survey", 28, pp.1661~1707 (1990)
  14. "The Dynamics of Science-Based Innovation Reconsidered Cognitive Models of Statistical Findings Economics of Technology" (1994)
  15. "Highly Innovative Small Firms in the Markets for Technology", 34(5), pp.703~716 (2005)
  16. "Innovation in East Asia The Challenge to Japan, Aldershot, Hants" (1995), Brookfield, Vt., E. Elgar.
  17. "How Does Technology Fusion Generate Technological Opportunities?" (2005)
  18. "The Role of Small Innovative Firms in Multi-Technology Innovation" (2006), Univ. of Sussex.
  19. "Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy" (2002), MIT Press.
  20. "Imitation to Innovation. The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning" (1997), Harvard Business School Press.
  21. "The Korean System of Innovation and the Semiconductor Industry:A Governance Perspective", 7(2), pp.275~309 (1998)
  22. "Analyzing Japanese High Technologies:The Techno-Paradigm Shift,London" (1991), Pinter Publishers.
  23. "Emerging Patterns of Innovation:Sources of Japan's Technological Edge" (1995), Harvard Business School Press.
  24. "Small Firms, R&D, Technology and Innovation in the UK: A Literature Review", 18(1), pp.39~55 (1998)
  25. "The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change:Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change", 7, pp.217~247 (1998)
  26. "the Size of Firms and Industrial Policy Lessons from a Comparative Case Study of the Footwear Industry in Korea and Taiwan Journal of Development Economics", 34, pp.151~178 (1991)
  27. "A Sillicon Valley of the East:Creating Taiwan’s Semiconducter Industry", 39(4), pp.26~54 (1997)
  28. "Economic Analysis of University-Industry Collaborations The Role of New Technology Based Firms in Japanese National Innovation Reform", pp.04~ (2004)
  29. "Patent Bibliometrics", 30, pp.147~155 (1994)
  30. "National Innovation Systems:A Comparative Analysis,Oxford" (1993), Oxford University Press.
  31. "Knowledge, Technological Regimes and Technological Catch-Up: Comparing Korea and Taiwan Using U.S. Patent Data" (2004), Seoul National Univ.
  32. "Patent Statistics as Indicators of Innovative Activities:Possibilities and Problems", 7, pp.77~99 (1985)
  33. "Firm Size and Dynamic Technological Innovation", 22, pp.537~549 (2002)
  34. "Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence" (1997), Harvard Business School Press.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)