본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Patented Knowledge And Its Commercialization

정의교
한국콘텐츠학회 (The Korea Contents Association)|2013.06|International Journal of Contents|제9권 제2호|pp. 38-47|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2013.9.2.038

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

CommercializationPatented Knowledgeand Scope of Patents
주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

We examine whether the attributes of patented knowledge have any impact on its chances of commercialization. It has been hypothesized that the scope and cumulativeness of patented knowledge would positively affect the likelihood of its commercialization. The hypotheses were tested using patents data on the US biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. We found support for the prediction that the scope of patented knowledge increases the likelihood of commercialization, but we didn’t find support for the cumulativeness aspect. These findings have important implications for firms that develop patentable knowledge, license-out patents, license-in patents from external sources, or debate about patenting strategy.

Abstract

We examine whether the attributes of patented knowledge have any impact on its chances of commercialization. It has been hypothesized that the scope and cumulativeness of patented knowledge would positively affect the likelihood of its commercialization. The hypotheses were tested using patents data on the US biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. We found support for the prediction that the scope of patented knowledge increases the likelihood of commercialization, but we didn’t find support for the cumulativeness aspect. These findings have important implications for firms that develop patentable knowledge, license-out patents, license-in patents from external sources, or debate about patenting strategy.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. W. B. Arthur, "The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves" (2009), Free Press
  2. D. Foray, "Economics of knowledge" (2004), MIT Press
  3. R. Ng, Drugs, "From discovery to approval" (2004), Wiley-Liss
  4. T. L. Wherry, "Patent searching for librarians and inventors", American Library Association, ~ (1995)
  5. G. Ahuja, "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions", Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), pp.521~543 (2001)
  6. P. Almeida, "Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks", Management Science, 45(7), pp.905~917 (1999)
  7. A. Arundel, "What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms", Research Policy, 27(2), pp.127~141 (1999)
  8. M. Ceccagnoli, "Appropriability, Preemption, and Firm Performance", Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), pp.81~98 (2009)
  9. W. M. Cohen, "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128~152 (1990)
  10. D. M. DeCarolis, "The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry", Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), pp.953~968 (1999)
  11. C. Dhanaraj, "Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in lJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance", Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), pp.428~442 (2004)
  12. D. Dranove, "Do important drugs reach the market sooner?", RAND Journal of Economics, 25(3), pp.402~423 (1994)
  13. R. Gilbert, "Optimal patent length and breadth", RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), pp.106~112 (1990)
  14. B. Gomes-Casseres, "Do alliances promote knowledge flows?", Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), pp.5~33 (2006)
  15. B. H. Hall, "Market value and patent citations", Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), pp.16~38 (2005)
  16. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools, "B. H. Hall", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper Series, No. 8498 (2001)
  17. B. H. Hall, "The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995", Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), pp.101~128 (2001)
  18. M. T. Hansen, "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits", Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), pp.82~111 (1999)
  19. M. T. Hansen, "Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases", Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), pp.776~793 (2005)
  20. D. Harhoff, "Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development", Management Science, 42(6), pp.907~925 (1996)
  21. D. Harhoff, "Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions", Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), pp.511~515 (1999)
  22. G. Hoetker, "Death hurts, but it isn't fatal: The postexit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies", Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), pp.446~467 (2007)
  23. A. B. Jaffe, "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Values", American Economic Review, 76(5), pp.984~1001 (1986)
  24. A. B. Jaffe, "Demand and supply influence in R&D intensity and productivity growth", Review of Economics & Statistics, 70(3), pp.431~437 (1988)
  25. A. B. Jaffe, "Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors", American Economic Review, 90(2), pp.215~218 (2000)
  26. A. B. Jaffe, "Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), pp.577~598 (1993)
  27. P. Klemperer, "How broad should the scope of patent protection be?", RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), pp.113~130 (1990)
  28. P. J. Lane, "Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures", Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), pp.1139~1161 (2001)
  29. J. O. Lanjouw, "Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition", RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), pp.129~151 (2001)
  30. J. Lerner, "The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis", RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), pp.319~333 (1994)
  31. J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
  32. S. F. Matusik, "An empirical investigation of firm public and private knowledge", Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), pp.457~467 (2002)
  33. R. G. McGrath, "Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms", Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), pp.1~21 (2004)
  34. D. C. Mowery, "Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer", Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), pp.77~91 (1996)
  35. A. Nerkar, "Technological and product-market experience and the new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry", Strategic Management Journal, 25(8, pp.9) (2004), 779~799
  36. A. Nerkar, "Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions", Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), pp.1155~1166 (2007)
  37. M. Reitzig, "What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry", Research Policy, 32(1), pp.13~26 (2003)
  38. L. Rosenkopf, "Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility", Management Science, 49(6), pp.751~766 (2003)
  39. M. A. Schilling, "Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation", Management Science, 53(7), pp.1113~1126 (2007)
  40. G. Szulanski, "Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp.27~43 (1996)
  41. M. Trajtenberg, "University versus corporate patents: A window of the basicness of invention", Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 5(1), pp.19~50 (1997)
  42. E. von Hippel, "Economics of product development by users: The impact of "sticky" local information", Management Science, 44(5), pp.629~644 (1998)
  43. R. H. Ziedonis, "Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms", Management Science, 50(6), pp.804~820 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

Knowledge Combination and the Usefulness of Inventions: Focusing on the Moderating Effects of Technological Change문희진, 정예림한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2018 · 제9권 제10호Technology Licensing Agreements from an Organizational Learning Perspective송상영, 이종국한국마케팅학회 · 아시아마케팅저널2013 · 제15권 제3호Patent Litigation and Innovation Strategy: A Cognitive Perspective on the Biopharmaceutical Industry안신혜한국전략경영학회 · 전략경영연구2023 · 제26권 제2호Quality and Value of Chinese Patenting: An International PerspectiveGrid Thoma경제연구소 · Seoul Journal of Economics2013 · 제26권 제1호Patenting Dilemma for Startups: Number of Applied Patents, Patent Imitability, and Level of VC Funding김봉선, 김언수, Christophe FERAUD한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2019 · 제14권 제3호Influences of intellectual property management and intermediary services on corporate licensing activities김연배, 이성기한국혁신학회 · 한국혁신학회지2010 · 제5권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Improvement of ASIFT for Object Matching Based on Optimized Random Sampling나인섭, 김수형, Dung Phanpp. 1-7Systematic Approach for Detecting Text in Images Using Supervised LearningMinh Hieu Nguyen, 이귀상pp. 8-13A Study on Multibiometrics derived from Calling Activity Context using Smartphone for Implicit User Authentication SystemAli Fahmi Perwira Negara, 최덕재, 염재근pp. 14-21Development and Evaluation of PDF Report Annotation Tool GABA Facilitating Comment ReuseTetsuro Kakeshita, Shoichi Motoyamapp. 22-26Further Investigations on the Financial Attributes of the Firms listed in the KOSDAQ Stock Market김한준pp. 27-37
원문 보기