갈레노스의 영혼론
Galen’s Theory of the Soul
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to explain Galen’s theory of the soul in the context of medicine and philosophy during the Hellenistic and Roman periods. Analyzing various related texts, we will get the following conclusions: ① Galen inherited and developed the neuroanatomy of Herophilus and Erasistratus. While they were interested in basic bodily functions such as nutrition, digestion etc., they didn’t answer the question how the soul interacts with the body. Galen, on the contrary, explained in detail the relation between the soul and the body, because he thought that the body and the soul interact mutually. According to Galen, our bodily mixtures and pneuma can change as a result of environment and life style. So it is up to us to manage and maintain our physical and psychological health. ② Although Galen was influenced by Plato’s philosophy, he did not accept uncritically Plato’s view. Galen accepted only the empirically observable facts that are useful both for medicine and for ethical and political philosophy, while he withheld judgment on metaphysical hypotheses such as the substance of God or the soul. He tried to reinterpret and develop physiologically Plato’s tripartite theory of the soul. ③ Gill contends that Galen had better adopt the Stoic unified theory of the soul rather than Plato’s tripartite account. According to Gill, outside of De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, Galen’s brain-centered psycho-psysiology is consistent with the Stoic view. But in opposition to Gill’s interpretation, Galen’s De moribus says that three parts of the soul sometimes collaborate with each other, sometimes conflict with each other. Gallen thinks that pneuma(or neura) is a medium through which the three parts of the soul communicate and cooperate with each other. Therefore, the body and the soul function properly, when the three parts do their own job in harmony with each other.
Abstract
This paper aims to explain Galen’s theory of the soul in the context of medicine and philosophy during the Hellenistic and Roman periods. Analyzing various related texts, we will get the following conclusions: ① Galen inherited and developed the neuroanatomy of Herophilus and Erasistratus. While they were interested in basic bodily functions such as nutrition, digestion etc., they didn’t answer the question how the soul interacts with the body. Galen, on the contrary, explained in detail the relation between the soul and the body, because he thought that the body and the soul interact mutually. According to Galen, our bodily mixtures and pneuma can change as a result of environment and life style. So it is up to us to manage and maintain our physical and psychological health. ② Although Galen was influenced by Plato’s philosophy, he did not accept uncritically Plato’s view. Galen accepted only the empirically observable facts that are useful both for medicine and for ethical and political philosophy, while he withheld judgment on metaphysical hypotheses such as the substance of God or the soul. He tried to reinterpret and develop physiologically Plato’s tripartite theory of the soul. ③ Gill contends that Galen had better adopt the Stoic unified theory of the soul rather than Plato’s tripartite account. According to Gill, outside of De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, Galen’s brain-centered psycho-psysiology is consistent with the Stoic view. But in opposition to Gill’s interpretation, Galen’s De moribus says that three parts of the soul sometimes collaborate with each other, sometimes conflict with each other. Gallen thinks that pneuma(or neura) is a medium through which the three parts of the soul communicate and cooperate with each other. Therefore, the body and the soul function properly, when the three parts do their own job in harmony with each other.
참고문헌 (43)
- 여인석, "갈레노스의 질병개념", 의사학, 12(1), pp.4~65 (2003), 대한의사학회
- 여인석, "철학과의 관계에서 본 의학적 합리성의 기원― 고대희랍의학을 중심으로 ―", 서양고전학연구, (25), pp.93~120 (2006), 한국서양고전학회
- Arnim, H. von, "Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta (SVF.). 4Vols" (1903), Teubner
- Boer, W, "Galeni De propriorum animi cuiuslibet affectuum dignotione et curatione" (1937), Teubner
- Boudon, V, "Galen: Exhortation à l’étude de la médecine, Art médical (Boudon)" (2000), Les belles lettres
- Burnet, J, "Platonis opera. Vol.4" (1902), Clarendon Press
- De Lacy, P, "Galen’s Platonism", The American Journal of Philology, 93(1), pp.27~39 (1972)
- De Lacy, P, "Galeni De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis (De Lacy). 3Vols", pp.2~ (2005), Akademie Verlag
- Dorandi, T, "Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Eijk, Philip van der, "Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy", pp.62~88 (2020), Cambridge University Press
- Wilkie), "Galen: On Respiration and the Arteries (Furley", pp.1984, Furley, D.J
- Ghalioungui, Paul, "Questions on Medicine for Scholars" (1980), Al-Ahram Center for Scientific Translations
- Gill, C, "Body and soul in Ancient Philosophy", pp.409~423 (2007), Walter de Gruyter
- Gill, C, "Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Havrda, M, "Body and Cosmos in Galen’s Account of the Soul", Phronesis, 62, pp.69~89 (2017)
- Helmreich, G, "Galeni de usu partium libri xvii. 2Vols" (1907), Teubner
- Helmreich, G, "Galeni de temperamentis libri iii" (1904), Teubner
- Helmreich, G, "Galeni de usu partium libri xvii. 2Vols" (1907), Teubner
- Johnston, Ian, "Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World", pp.765~788 (2018)
- Kaufman, D, "Galen on Reason and Appetite: A Study of the De Moribus", Apeiron, 50(3), pp.367~392 (2017)
- Koch, K, "Galeni de sanitate tuenda libri vi. CMG. Vol. 5.4.2" (1923), Teubner
- Kraus, P, "Kitāb al-Akhlāq li-Jālīnus", Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts of the Egyptian University, 5(1), pp.1~51 (1937)
- Kühn, C.G, "Claudii Galeni opera omnia (Kühn). 22Vols" (1821), Knobloch
- Larrain, C.J, "Ein unbekanntes Exzerpt aus Galens Timaioskommentar", Zeitschrift fuer Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 85, pp.17~30 (1991)
- Leith, David, "Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy", pp.30~61 (2020), Cambridge University Press
- Marechal, P, "Galen’s Constitutive Materialism", Ancient Philosophy, 39(1), pp.191~209 (2019)
- Marquardt, J, "Claudii Galeni Pergameni scripta minora. 3Vols" (1884), Teubner
- Nutton, V, "Galeni De propriis placitis (Nutton)", pp.2~ (1999)
- Schiefsky, M, "Plato and the Divided Self", pp.331~349 (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Schröder, H.O, "Galeni in Platonis Timaeum commentarii fragmenta (Schröder)" (1934), Teubner
- Singer, P.N, "Galeno: obra, pensamiento e influencia: Coloquio internacional Madrid 1988", pp.41~55 (1988), Madrid
- Singer, P.N, "Galen: Psychological Writings" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Singer, P.N, "The Concept of Pneuma After Aristotle", pp.237~281 (2020), Edition Topoi
- Staden, H. von, "Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria (von Staden)" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Staden, H. von, "Psyche and Soma", pp.79~116 (2000), Clarendon Press
- Stok, F abio, "Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World", pp.359~380 (2018)
- Susemihl, F, "Aristotle. Vol. 18" (1935), Harvard University Press
- Tempkin, O, "On Galen’s Pneumatology", Gesnerus, 8, pp.180~189 (1951)
- Tieleman, T, "Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture", pp.256~273 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Vander Waerdt, P.A, "The Peripatetic Interpretation of Plato’s Tripartite Psychology", Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 26(Iss.3), pp.283~302 (1985)
- Vander Waerdt, P, "Peripatetic Soul-Division, Posidonius, and Middle Platonic Moral Psychology", Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 26(Iss.4), pp.373~394 (1985)
- Wenkebach, E, "Der hippokratische Arzt als das Ideal Galens", Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und Medizin, 3(4), pp.170~175 (1933)
- Wright, J.L, "Brain and soul in late antiquity", PhD, pp.2016