이탈리아 르네상스에 대한 상호관계론적인 해석 - 아랍-무슬림과 지중해의 문명 간 융합을 중심으로 -
The Impact of mutual interrelations between Eastern and Western civilizations on the Italian Renaissance: focus on the Arab-Muslim and amalgamation between the local civilizations in the Mediterranean
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Mediterranean is the multi-cultural civilization’s route and is the sea of the earthenware steamer for the mutual interrelations between Eastern and Western civilizations. Based on these facts, Renaissance can be differently interpreted from an argument of Burckhardt in the last 19th century(“Rediscovery of Greek and Roman culture”). Consequently it goes beyond the bounds of the eurocentric point of view. The Renaissance could be translated differently as a mutual way, the new point of view. The interpretation of mutual interrelations between Eastern and Western civilizations on the Italian Renaissance focuses on three things following:First, any conclusion could not be intended to understand by specific purposes. Second, all related causes could be considered and evaluated as organic and dynamic relations. From the point of view of cultural exchange, the Mediterranean has never been excluded by the Christian world, Arab-Muslim, German and the Norman, rather it was shared by them. Third, generally, the history has to be interpreted not in the logic of negation or denial, but in the logic of the ‘root and branch’(物有本末, 事有終始). According to the interpretation based on ‘the theory of mutual interrelations’, The Mediterranean, especially the Sicily and Southern Italy, at which ‘Via Francigena’(from Northern Europe until to Jerusalem passing through Italian Peninsula) and ‘global multicultural civilizations road(from Gibraltar, Anatolia, India to China)’ are intersected. Besides Arab-Muslim performed a role of ‘a great messenger ofcivilizations’ to Western Europe after they accept and progress thecivilizations derived form the eastern world through ‘Global multiculturalcivilizations road’. From this point of view, the Italian Renaissance in the 14-16 centurywas the fruits of the amalgamation of the Wast-west civilizations in theMediterranean sea.
Abstract
The Mediterranean is the multi-cultural civilization’s route and is the sea of the earthenware steamer for the mutual interrelations between Eastern and Western civilizations. Based on these facts, Renaissance can be differently interpreted from an argument of Burckhardt in the last 19th century(“Rediscovery of Greek and Roman culture”). Consequently it goes beyond the bounds of the eurocentric point of view. The Renaissance could be translated differently as a mutual way, the new point of view. The interpretation of mutual interrelations between Eastern and Western civilizations on the Italian Renaissance focuses on three things following:First, any conclusion could not be intended to understand by specific purposes. Second, all related causes could be considered and evaluated as organic and dynamic relations. From the point of view of cultural exchange, the Mediterranean has never been excluded by the Christian world, Arab-Muslim, German and the Norman, rather it was shared by them. Third, generally, the history has to be interpreted not in the logic of negation or denial, but in the logic of the ‘root and branch’(物有本末, 事有終始). According to the interpretation based on ‘the theory of mutual interrelations’, The Mediterranean, especially the Sicily and Southern Italy, at which ‘Via Francigena’(from Northern Europe until to Jerusalem passing through Italian Peninsula) and ‘global multicultural civilizations road(from Gibraltar, Anatolia, India to China)’ are intersected. Besides Arab-Muslim performed a role of ‘a great messenger ofcivilizations’ to Western Europe after they accept and progress thecivilizations derived form the eastern world through ‘Global multiculturalcivilizations road’. From this point of view, the Italian Renaissance in the 14-16 centurywas the fruits of the amalgamation of the Wast-west civilizations in theMediterranean sea.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김능우, "이슬람의 과학과 문화 –중세 과학의 세계 중심지 중동-", 계간 과학사상, (겨울), pp.130~147 (2001)
- 김봉철, "서양고대사학의 새로운 해석", 서양고전학연구, 13 (1999)
- 김정명, "아랍어-라틴어 번역 운동이 유럽의 르네상스에 미친 영향", 인문과학연구논총, 35(1), pp.175~214 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- 김차규, "19세기 이전 프랑스인들의 한국인식", 인문과학연구논총, (32), pp.101~136 (2011), 인문과학연구소
- 이민호, "세계사를 어떻게 읽을 것인가: 유럽 중심주의 사관의 극복을 위하여", 역사비평
- 정수일, "지중해 문명과 지중해학", 지중해지역연구, 5(1), pp.1~23 (2003), 지중해지역원
- 윤용수, "지중해지역원 인문총서 시리즈" (2010), 이담북스
- 정수일, "향토와 문화" (2002), 대구은행
- 황의갑, "이슬람세계-유럽 문명의 지적 교류", 한국중동학회논총, 34(4), pp.161~181 (2014), 한국중동학회
- 차영길, "“지중해는 로마 제국을 새롭게 이해하게 하는가?”", 지중해지역연구, 7(1), pp.61~81 (2005), 지중해지역원
- 박상진, "지중해학 : 세계화 시대의 지중해 문명" (2005), 살림지식총서
- 장 카르팡티에, "다양성에서 단일성으로 5〜15세기", pp.165~258 (2006), 한길사
- 남종국, "지중해 교역은 유럽을 어떻게 바꾸었을까?" (2011), 민음인
- 요시미즈 츠네오, "로마문화 왕국, 신라, 방대한 유물과 사료로 파헤친 신라문화의 비밀" (2002), 씨앗을 뿌리는 사람
- 강일휴, "마호메트와 샤를마뉴" (2010), 삼천리
- 제임스 M. 불로트, "역사학의 함정 유럽중심주의를 비판한다" (2008), 푸른숲
- Peter Burke, "Il Rinascimento" (1989), Mulino
- J. B. Bullen, "The Myth of the Renaissance on the Nineteenth Century Writing" (1994), Oxford Press
- E. H. Carr, "Sei lezioni sulla storia" (1966), Einaudi
- J. Burckhardt, "Briefe" (1952), Basel
- P. Burke, "The Fortunes of the Courtier" (1995), Cambridge Press
- J. Burckhardt, "Ein guter Privatmensch" (1952)
- C. S. Jaeger, "The Origins of Courtliness" (1985), Pennsylvania University Press
- Hopkins, Keith, "Trade in the Ancient Economy" (1983), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Alberto Angela, "Impero" (2010), Mondadori
- M. Mann, "Sources of Social Power, 1권. A Histiry of Power from the Beginning to A. D. 1760" (1986), Cambridge Press
- Bernal, Martin, "Black Athena" (1987), Rutgers Univ. Press
