본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한 최고지도자 헌법적 지위·권한 변동에 관한 연구: 주석-국방위원장-국무위원장의 지위·권한 교차비교를 중점으로

A Study on the Changes in the Constitutional Status and Authority of NK Supreme Leader: Focusing on the cross-comparison of the statuses and authorities among the President, Chairman of the National Defense Commission, and Chairman of the State Affairs

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The North Korean constitution regulates the status and authority of the supreme leader in detail. Therefore, through reviewing the revised constitutions of North Korea, we can compare the constitutional status and authority of Kim Il Sung (President), Kim Jong Il (Chairman of the National Defense Commission), and Kim Jong Un (Chairman of the State Affairs Commission). This study comparatively analyzed the 1972 Socialist Constitution when the status of the 'President' was the highest, the 2009 revised Constitution when the status of the 'Chairman of the National Defense Commission' was the highest, and the 2019 revised Constitution(14th, 15th amendments) when the status of the 'Chairman of the State Affairs Commission' was the highest. As a result, the constitutional status and authority of ‘Chairman of the State Affairs Commission’ took precedence over ‘President’ and ‘Chairman of the National Defense Commission’. One of the representative distinctions in terms of status is the fact that the new constitution(Article 101 of the 15th amendment) regulates that the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission does not serve as representatives of the Supreme People's Assembly. ‘President’ and ‘Chairman of the National Defense Commission’ had served as representatives to the Supreme People's Assembly, although not regulated by law. In terms of constitutional authority, the distinct difference is the right to “appoint and summon diplomatic representatives stationed in other countries” (Article 104). It is an authority that neither the president nor the Chairman of the National Defense Commission had in the past. In August 2019, with the introduction of the new Constitution, this right was transferred to the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission from the Standing committee of the Supreme People's Assembly. Kim Jong Un had exercised this right to summon his uncle Kim Pyong Il, the ambassador to the Czech Republic(2019.11). It must have been an exercise of authority to prevent the leakage of power and to consolidate the monolithic leadership system. This is a good example for showing the purpose of expanding and strengthening Kim Jong Un's constitutional status and authority. The constitutional status of Kim Jong Un (Chairman of the State Affairs Commission) reached its peak in the new constitution in August 2019 and surpassed not only Kim Jong Il (Chairman of the National Defense Commission) but also Kim Il Sung (President). The preface to the Constitution states that it is “Kim Il Sung - Kim Jong Il Constitution,” but it seems safe to call it “Kim Jong Un Constitution.” This upgrade of Kim Jong Un's constitutional status and authority in 2019 fully predicted the change (rise) of Kim Jong Un's party status at the 8th Party Congress held in January this year.

Abstract

The North Korean constitution regulates the status and authority of the supreme leader in detail. Therefore, through reviewing the revised constitutions of North Korea, we can compare the constitutional status and authority of Kim Il Sung (President), Kim Jong Il (Chairman of the National Defense Commission), and Kim Jong Un (Chairman of the State Affairs Commission). This study comparatively analyzed the 1972 Socialist Constitution when the status of the 'President' was the highest, the 2009 revised Constitution when the status of the 'Chairman of the National Defense Commission' was the highest, and the 2019 revised Constitution(14th, 15th amendments) when the status of the 'Chairman of the State Affairs Commission' was the highest. As a result, the constitutional status and authority of ‘Chairman of the State Affairs Commission’ took precedence over ‘President’ and ‘Chairman of the National Defense Commission’. One of the representative distinctions in terms of status is the fact that the new constitution(Article 101 of the 15th amendment) regulates that the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission does not serve as representatives of the Supreme People's Assembly. ‘President’ and ‘Chairman of the National Defense Commission’ had served as representatives to the Supreme People's Assembly, although not regulated by law. In terms of constitutional authority, the distinct difference is the right to “appoint and summon diplomatic representatives stationed in other countries” (Article 104). It is an authority that neither the president nor the Chairman of the National Defense Commission had in the past. In August 2019, with the introduction of the new Constitution, this right was transferred to the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission from the Standing committee of the Supreme People's Assembly. Kim Jong Un had exercised this right to summon his uncle Kim Pyong Il, the ambassador to the Czech Republic(2019.11). It must have been an exercise of authority to prevent the leakage of power and to consolidate the monolithic leadership system. This is a good example for showing the purpose of expanding and strengthening Kim Jong Un's constitutional status and authority. The constitutional status of Kim Jong Un (Chairman of the State Affairs Commission) reached its peak in the new constitution in August 2019 and surpassed not only Kim Jong Il (Chairman of the National Defense Commission) but also Kim Il Sung (President). The preface to the Constitution states that it is “Kim Il Sung - Kim Jong Il Constitution,” but it seems safe to call it “Kim Jong Un Constitution.” This upgrade of Kim Jong Un's constitutional status and authority in 2019 fully predicted the change (rise) of Kim Jong Un's party status at the 8th Party Congress held in January this year.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 장명봉, "북한헌법 50년, 그 동향과 전망" (1999), 아시아사회과학연구원
  2. 통일원정보분석실, "주간북한동향 제261호" (1995), 통일원
  3. 김창순, "북한의 대내정치상황전망", 북한학보, 8 (1984)
  4. 민원표, "북한 헌법에 대한 이해와 새로운 통일교육", 미래교육연구, 11(1), pp.49~94 (2021), 한국미래교육학회[DOI]
  5. 박선영, "조선민주주의인민공화국 헌법의 제정과 개정 과정을 통해 본 북한헌법에 관한 연구", 공법학연구, 16(4), pp.27~67 (2015), 한국비교공법학회[DOI]
  6. 박정원, "북한 헌법 체제의 특징과 전망", 제헌63주년 국회법제실·한국공법학회기념 공동학술대회 발표집 (2011)
  7. 박진우, "2009년 개정 북한헌법에 대한 분석과 평가 -권력구조를 중심으로-", 세계헌법연구, 16(3), pp.855~880 (2010), 세계헌법학회한국학회
  8. 이효원, "2009년 북한헌법 개정과 북한체제의 변화", 국가안보전략연구소 학술회의 발표집 (2009)
  9. 장명봉, "분단 65년-북한 헌법의 변화와 지속", 북한법 연구, (13) (2011)
  10. 정교진, "북한의 김일성-김정일 우상화 전략 및 특성 비교 연구: 지도자 우상화의 ‘신화적 사고’ 접근 유·무 비교분석을 중점으로", 통일인문학, 68, pp.297~335 (2016), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  11. 정영태, "헌법개정과 북한 권력구조의 변화: 당·정·군관계를 중심으로", 국가안보전략연구소 학술회의 발표집 (2009)
  12. 조재현, "북한헌법 개정의 배경과 특징에 관한 헌법사 연구", 미국헌법연구, 29(3), pp.273~304 (2018), 미국헌법학회
  13. 백근현, "북한 권력구조 변화에 대한 비교체제론적 연구 : 북한과 중국의 헌법 및공산당 비교", 박사, pp.2015
  14. 조재현, "북한헌법의 변화에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과 공법전공, pp.2012
  15. 정교진, "북한정권의 지도자상징정치에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2016
  16. 김일성, "김일성 저작집제1권" (1979), 조선로동당출판사
  17. 김정일, "김정일 선집 제9권" (1989), 조선로동당출판사
  18. 김영훈, "선국사상의 뿌리, 철학연구" (2009), 사회과학출판사
  19. 조선로동당출판사, "조선중앙년감 2011" (2011), 조선로동당출판사
  20. "북한인민민주주의헌법(제정헌법,1948)", ~ (1948)
  21. "5차개정헌법", ~ (1962)
  22. "북한사회주의헌법", ~ (1972)
  23. "7차개정헌법", ~ (1992)
  24. "김일성헌법", ~ (1998)
  25. "9차개정헌법", ~ (2009)
  26. "김일성-김정일헌법", ~ (2012)
  27. "12차개정헌법", ~ (2013)
  28. "13차개정헌법", ~ (2016)
  29. "14차개정헌법", ~ (2019)
  30. "북한새헌법", ~ (2019)
  31. "2016년 당규약 전문", 2021 당규약 전문
  32. "로동신문(2013", 04, pp.2013, ~
  33. "로동신문(2013", 04, pp.2013, ~
  34. "로동신문(2021", 01, pp.2021, ~
  35. "김정은이 언급한 ‘선임자’… 아버지 김정일 아냐" (2019)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)