CT 검사 시 관전류 자동조절기법이 선량에 미치는 영향
The Impact of the AEC Mode of Tube Current on the Dose at CT Scans
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, the automatic exposure control (AEC) modes of tube current (SIEMENSCareDose 4D and GE AEC mode) that CT manufacturers are using was applied to neck, chestand abdomen in order to determine the difference in the respective dose parameters (CTDIvol,DLP and mSv) resulting from the dose reduction. Equipment in use at C university adopted CareDose 4D of Siemens and AEC mode of General Electric (GE), and the x-ray exposure conditionswere adjusted to be as identical as possible between the experiments. For the assessment of thedose reduction, the differences between the doses with and without the use of the tube currentAEC mode by the respective manufacturer were measured for each body part including neck,chest and abdomen of a human phantom, Rando Phantom (Art-200x, Fluke Biomedical, USA). First, the assessment of SIEMENS-Care Dose 4D yielded the following results. At the neck, theautomatic exposure control resulted in a 3.3% reduction in CTDIvol and DLP, and a 3% reductionin the effective dose, mSv, compared to manual exposure control. The automatic exposure controlat the chest displayed the reduction in CTDIvol and DLP by 25.5%, and in the effective dose, mSv,by 25.4% compared to the manual exposure control. In case of abdomen, CTDIvol and DLP wereshown to be reduced by 16%, and the effective dose (mSv) by 16.3% under the automatic exposurecontrol compared to the manual exposure. Second, the assessment results of GE AEC mode are asfollows. The automatic exposure control at the neck resulted in a 45.1% reduction in CTDIvol andDLP, and a 44.7% reduction in the effective dose (mSv) in comparison to the manual exposurecontrol. At the chest, the automatic exposure control displayed a 47.6% reduction in CTDIvoland DLP, and a 47.5% reduction in the effective dose, mSv, compared to the manual exposurecontrol. At the abdomen, it was shown that CTDIvol and DLP were reduced by 26.9%, and theeffective dose (mSv) by 26.8% under the automatic exposure control compared to the manualexposure. The assessment results of the two automatic exposure control modes of tube current at each part (neck, chest and abdomen) of a Rando Phantom thus suggested that the effective dose(mSv), CTDIvol and DLP were reduced in the AEC mode compared to the manual control, andthe radiation dose to patients could be significantly reduced via the use of the AEC mode.
Abstract
In this study, the automatic exposure control (AEC) modes of tube current (SIEMENSCareDose 4D and GE AEC mode) that CT manufacturers are using was applied to neck, chestand abdomen in order to determine the difference in the respective dose parameters (CTDIvol,DLP and mSv) resulting from the dose reduction. Equipment in use at C university adopted CareDose 4D of Siemens and AEC mode of General Electric (GE), and the x-ray exposure conditionswere adjusted to be as identical as possible between the experiments. For the assessment of thedose reduction, the differences between the doses with and without the use of the tube currentAEC mode by the respective manufacturer were measured for each body part including neck,chest and abdomen of a human phantom, Rando Phantom (Art-200x, Fluke Biomedical, USA). First, the assessment of SIEMENS-Care Dose 4D yielded the following results. At the neck, theautomatic exposure control resulted in a 3.3% reduction in CTDIvol and DLP, and a 3% reductionin the effective dose, mSv, compared to manual exposure control. The automatic exposure controlat the chest displayed the reduction in CTDIvol and DLP by 25.5%, and in the effective dose, mSv,by 25.4% compared to the manual exposure control. In case of abdomen, CTDIvol and DLP wereshown to be reduced by 16%, and the effective dose (mSv) by 16.3% under the automatic exposurecontrol compared to the manual exposure. Second, the assessment results of GE AEC mode are asfollows. The automatic exposure control at the neck resulted in a 45.1% reduction in CTDIvol andDLP, and a 44.7% reduction in the effective dose (mSv) in comparison to the manual exposurecontrol. At the chest, the automatic exposure control displayed a 47.6% reduction in CTDIvoland DLP, and a 47.5% reduction in the effective dose, mSv, compared to the manual exposurecontrol. At the abdomen, it was shown that CTDIvol and DLP were reduced by 26.9%, and theeffective dose (mSv) by 26.8% under the automatic exposure control compared to the manualexposure. The assessment results of the two automatic exposure control modes of tube current at each part (neck, chest and abdomen) of a Rando Phantom thus suggested that the effective dose(mSv), CTDIvol and DLP were reduced in the AEC mode compared to the manual control, andthe radiation dose to patients could be significantly reduced via the use of the AEC mode.
참고문헌 (14)
- Diederich S, "Helical CT of pulmonary nodules in patients with extrathoracic malignancy: CT-surgical correlation", Am. J. Roentgenol, 172(2), pp.353~360 (1999)
- Hara AK, "Colorectal lesions : evaluation with CT colography", Radiographics, 17(5), pp.1167~1168 (1997)
- Huh JY, "A Study on the Reduction Dose of Radiation When Examining Coronary Artery through CT Tube Current Modulation Employing 64VCT.", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 10(1), pp.41~45 (2008)
- Giesler T, "Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection", Am. J. Roentgenol, 179(4), pp.911~916 (2002)
- Kalra MK, "Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis", Radiology, 232(2), pp.347~353 (2004)
- Kaneko M, "Peripheral lung cancer : screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography", Radiology, 201(3), pp.798~802 (1996)
- Kim HO., "Speed4D Technology with SOMATOM Sensation 64", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 6(1), pp.54~58 (2004)
- 김영옥, "인체 모형을 이용한 다중 검출기 컴퓨터단층촬영기기의 다양한 자동노출제어 시스템에 대한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 13(4), pp.1714~1720 (2012), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Klingenbeck-Regn K, "Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications", Eur. J. Radiol, 31(2), pp.1999~ (1999)
- Lee HJ, "A Experimental Study on Value of CTDIvol with dose modulation program of CareDose and CareDose4D in 16 MDCT", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 7(1), pp.148~156 (2005)
- Nam YC, "Dose measurement of MDCT compared to SDCT and dose comparison by change of scan parameter with 16 s1ice MDCT in abdominal CT examination", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 5(1), pp.55~63 (2003)
- Seo JY., "A Study of appropriate exposure condition in Chest CT for Care Dose 4D", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 10(1), pp.123~128 (2008)
- Shin SB, "The choice of optimal X-ray exposure factors in pediatric body CT", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 9(1), pp.55~61 (2007)
- Yoo HJ, "Radiation Do se and Image Quality in Neck An giography: Comparison of Dual Source Computed T omography and Multi-detector Computed Tomography", J. Kor. Soc. Comput. Tomogr. Technol, 12(2), pp.27~32 (2010)
