CareDose 4D 사용 시 동일한 스캔조건에서 조직기반설정을 다르게 적용함에 따른 선량 비교: 성인과 소아팬텀 연구
Radiation Dose Comparison according to Different Organ Characteristics at Same Scan Parameters Using CareDose 4D: An Adult and Pediatric Phantom Evaluation
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
CareDose 4D which is the Siemens’s Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) can adjust the level of radiation dose distribution which is based on organ characteristic unlike other manufacturer’s AEC. Currently, a wide scan range containing different organs is sometimes examined at once (defined as one scan). The purpose of this study was to figure out which organ characteristic option is suitable when one scan method is utilized. Two types of anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned in the same range which were from frontal bone to carina level according to three different organ characteristics such as Thorax, Abdomen, and Neck. All scans and image reconstruction parameters were equally applied and radiation dose were compared. Radiation dose with Thorax organ characteristic was lower than that with Neck. Also, that with Abdomen oran characteristic was lower than Thorax. There were significant differences in radiation dose according to different organ characteristics at the same parameters (P<0.05). Usage of Neck organ characteristic had a result of the highest radiation dose to all phantom. On the other hand, utilization of Abdomen organ characteristic showed the lowest radiation dose. As a result, it is desirable to set appropriate organ characteristic according to examined body part when you checkup patients. Also, when you implement one scan method, selection of Abdomen-based organ characteristic has reduced more radiation dose compared with two different organ characteristic.
Abstract
CareDose 4D which is the Siemens’s Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) can adjust the level of radiation dose distribution which is based on organ characteristic unlike other manufacturer’s AEC. Currently, a wide scan range containing different organs is sometimes examined at once (defined as one scan). The purpose of this study was to figure out which organ characteristic option is suitable when one scan method is utilized. Two types of anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned in the same range which were from frontal bone to carina level according to three different organ characteristics such as Thorax, Abdomen, and Neck. All scans and image reconstruction parameters were equally applied and radiation dose were compared. Radiation dose with Thorax organ characteristic was lower than that with Neck. Also, that with Abdomen oran characteristic was lower than Thorax. There were significant differences in radiation dose according to different organ characteristics at the same parameters (P<0.05). Usage of Neck organ characteristic had a result of the highest radiation dose to all phantom. On the other hand, utilization of Abdomen organ characteristic showed the lowest radiation dose. As a result, it is desirable to set appropriate organ characteristic according to examined body part when you checkup patients. Also, when you implement one scan method, selection of Abdomen-based organ characteristic has reduced more radiation dose compared with two different organ characteristic.
참고문헌 (20)
- 이만구, "CT검사건수 및 CT검사에 의한 집단 실효선량의 추정", 방사선기술과학, 33(3), pp.231~238 (2010), 대한방사선과학회
- 최민혁, "전산화단층촬영검사 시 검사실 내에 위치할 수 있는 의료인의 간접 피폭선량에 대한 연구", 방사선기술과학, 42(2), pp.105~111 (2019), 대한방사선과학회
- Lee KB, "Dose reduction and image quality assessment in MDCT using AEC (D-DOM & Z-DOM) and in-plane bismuth shielding", Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 141(2), pp.162~167 (2010)
- Soderberg M, "Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers", Acta Radiol, 51(6), pp.625~634 (2010)
- Park GJ, "Automatic Exposure Control Systems with Inappropriate Topogram : A Phantom study in Chest CT on Radiation dose and Image quality between different manufactures", Journal of Korean Society of Computed Tomographic Technology, 13(2), pp.227~238 (2011)
- Nguyen D, "Evaluation of a Single-Pass Continuous Whole-Body 16-MDCT Protocol for Patients with Polytrauma", Am J Roentgenol, 192(1), pp.3~10 (2009)
- Hauser H, "Radiologic emergency management in multiple trauma cases", Radiologe, 38(8), pp.637~644 (1998)
- Philipp MO, "Radiological emergency room management with emphasis on multidetector-row CT", Eur J Radiol, 48(1), pp.2~4 (2003)
- Mazumdar A, "Whole-Body Fast Inversion Recovery MR Imaging of Small Cell Neoplasms in Pediatric Patients : A Pilot Study", Am J Roentgenol, 179(5), pp.1261~1266 (2002)
- Marin D, "Body CT : technical advances for improving safety", Am J Roentgenol, 197(1), pp.33~41 (2011)
- Lee KB, "The Effect of Radiation Dose and Image Quality using AEC(Automatic Exposure Control)with Inappropriate Scout images : A Chest Phantom Experiment with Two Different AEC Modes", Journal of Korean Society of Computed Tomographic Technology, 18(1), pp.47~56 (2016)
- Wood TJ, "A practical method to standardise and optimise the Philips DoseRight 2.0 CT automatic exposure control system", J Radiol Prot, 35(3), pp.495~506 (2015)
- Russell MT, "Balancing radiation dose and image quality : clinical applications of neck volume CT", Am J Neuroradiol, 29(4), pp.727~731 (2008)
- McCollough CH, "Automatic exposure control in CT:are we done yet?", Radiology, 237(3), pp.755~756 (2005)
- Ki Baek Lee, "Quantitative Image Quality and Histogram-Based Evaluations of an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm at Low-to-Ultralow Radiation Dose Levels: A Phantom Study in Chest CT", Korean Journal of Radiology, 19(1), pp.119~129 (2018), 대한영상의학회[DOI]
- Leipsic J, "A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction", Am J Roentgenol, 195(5), pp.1095~1099 (2010)
- 구현우, "CT Radiation Dose Optimization and Estimation: an Update for Radiologists", Korean Journal of Radiology, 13(1), pp.1~11 (2012), 대한영상의학회
- Baker ME, "Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full-and low-dose MDCT : SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver", Am J Roentgenol, 199(1), pp.8~18 (2012)
- Singh S, "Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques", Radiology, 257(2), pp.373~383 (2010)
- Wang L, "CARE Dose 4D combined with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction improved the image quality and reduced the radiation dose in low dose CT of the small intestine", J Appl Clin Med Phys, 20(1), pp.293~307 (2019)