DXA를 이용한 숙련된 방사선사와 초보 방사선사의정밀도 측정과 검사시간 및 분석시간에 관한 연구
A Study on the Precision Test, Examination and Analysis Time of Experienced Medical Radiation Technologists and Beginner Radiation Technologists Using DXA
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Variations between experienced x-ray technologists and beginners could be discoveredon DXA accuracy tests, indicating their differences in knowledge and experience. This study analyzesthe relationship between DXA scan times on the accuracy test and the level of experience withDXA. Through this research we may improve the diagnostic dependability and productivity of DXAstudies. The target group of this research were 24 technologists in Seoul who have been workingin the DXA departments of general hospitals. We have analyzed their accuracy test and scanningtime data, as well as the duration of the accuracy analysis. We then divided them into two groups,one with more than 3 months of sufficient training and the other with only 1 month of basic training. After comparing the data between the two groups, we discovered a slightly higher DXA accuracyin the beginner group, however the difference was not statistically meaningful. The experiencedgroup demonstrated faster scan times and following analysis time to a statistically meaningfuldegree (p<0.05). Based on this research, we can conclude that dependability and productivitycould be improved through sufficient enough training for a certain period of time.
Abstract
Variations between experienced x-ray technologists and beginners could be discoveredon DXA accuracy tests, indicating their differences in knowledge and experience. This study analyzesthe relationship between DXA scan times on the accuracy test and the level of experience withDXA. Through this research we may improve the diagnostic dependability and productivity of DXAstudies. The target group of this research were 24 technologists in Seoul who have been workingin the DXA departments of general hospitals. We have analyzed their accuracy test and scanningtime data, as well as the duration of the accuracy analysis. We then divided them into two groups,one with more than 3 months of sufficient training and the other with only 1 month of basic training. After comparing the data between the two groups, we discovered a slightly higher DXA accuracyin the beginner group, however the difference was not statistically meaningful. The experiencedgroup demonstrated faster scan times and following analysis time to a statistically meaningfuldegree (p<0.05). Based on this research, we can conclude that dependability and productivitycould be improved through sufficient enough training for a certain period of time.
참고문헌 (12)
- 건강보험심사평가원, "2013-2017", ~ (2019)
- 대한골대사학회, "2017 한국인골다공증 및 골다공증골절 Fact Sheet", ~ (2018)
- 2018 인구주택총조사 <등록센서스 방식 집계결과>, "통계청", ~ (2019)
- Baniak N, "Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan autoanalysis vs. manual analysis", J. Clin. Densitom, 17(1), pp.97~103 (2014)
- International Society for Clinical Densitometry(ISCD), "2019 ISCD Official Positions-Adult", ~ (2019)
- Kim BT, "Diagnostic approach to osteoporosis: interpretation of bone density measurement", Korean J. Fam. Pract, 3, pp.6~15 (2013)
- 김호성, "수도권 지역 병원에서 이중에너지 X-선 흡수측정법 (DXA)을 이용한 골밀도측정기 및 검사자의 정도관리에 관한 연구", 방사선산업학회지, 11(4), pp.283~289 (2017), (사)한국방사선산업학회[DOI]
- 양성오, "Quality Control of DXA System and Precision Test of Radio-technologists", 대한골대사학회지, 21(1), pp.2~7 (2014), 대한골대사학회
- 김호성, "골밀도 검사에서 환자 자세 변경 최소화에 따른 수검자의 불필요한 피폭선량 감소 및 생산성 향상", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 9(4), pp.228~235 (2009), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 김호성, "이중에너지 엑스선 흡광분석법을 이용한 골밀도검사의 관리법", 방사선기술과학, 41(4), pp.351~360 (2018), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]
- Lewiecki EM, "Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing", Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol, 4, pp.667~674 (2008)
- Persson C, "Does a novice technician produce results similar to that of an experienced DXA technician when assessing body composition and bone mineral density?", J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab, 29, pp.435~440 (2019)