이중에너지엑스선흡수기 (Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry: DXA)를 이용한 골밀도검사 결과분석에서 수동분석법의 유용성 평가
Usefulness of Manual Analysis of Bone Mineral Density Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The results of bone mineral density analysis using DXA were compared between automatic and manual methods. The purpose of this paper is to verify the range of errors of each analysis method in the same patient and select a proper method to minimize errors. Comparisons between automatic and manual analysis methods were made using BMD, BMC and AREA. Basal and follow up examinations were performed with the patients of normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis. In the basal examinations, the precision errors between automatic and manual method showed 1.9% in normal, 3.1% in osteopenia and 3.8% in osteoporosis. In case of follow up studies, the precision errors between automatic and manual method showed 2.3% in normal, 3.2% in osteopenia and 3.5% in osteoporosis. BMC and AREA also showed a tendency to increase precision errors on osteopenia and osteoporosis. Therefore, a manual method would be a better option to minimize errors in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.
Abstract
The results of bone mineral density analysis using DXA were compared between automatic and manual methods. The purpose of this paper is to verify the range of errors of each analysis method in the same patient and select a proper method to minimize errors. Comparisons between automatic and manual analysis methods were made using BMD, BMC and AREA. Basal and follow up examinations were performed with the patients of normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis. In the basal examinations, the precision errors between automatic and manual method showed 1.9% in normal, 3.1% in osteopenia and 3.8% in osteoporosis. In case of follow up studies, the precision errors between automatic and manual method showed 2.3% in normal, 3.2% in osteopenia and 3.5% in osteoporosis. BMC and AREA also showed a tendency to increase precision errors on osteopenia and osteoporosis. Therefore, a manual method would be a better option to minimize errors in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.
참고문헌 (9)
- Bouxsein ML., "Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength", Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol, 23, pp.741~753 (2009)
- Fenton J. J., "Osteoporosis overtreatment in a regional health care system", JAMA Intern. Med, 176, pp.391~393 (2016)
- "2017 ISCD Official Positions" (2017)[URL]
- Kim TY, "Variability in DXA Reporting and other challenges in osteoporosis evaluation", JAMA Intern. Med, 176, pp.393~395 (2016)
- Lewiecki EM, "Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry", J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab, 89(8), pp.3651~3655 (2004)
- Lewiecki EM, "DXA quality matters", J. Clin. Densitom, 9, pp.388~392 (2006)
- Lewiecki EM, "Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing", Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol, 4, pp.667~674 (2008)
- Messina C, "Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry", Eur. Radiol, 25, pp.1504~1511 (2015)
- Watts NB., "Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)", Osteoporos. Int, 15, pp.847~854 (2004)